SFO-XIY (Xi'an, China) summer seasonal service discontinued {will not return in 2018}
first HGH, now XIY. brian sumers (all credit to him) tweeted a what is probably a screenshot of a UA internal memo that states XIY service will not return next summer:
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...6c660350cd.jpg |
That sucks - it was a route I did want to try. Do folks think CTU will get chopped at some point as well, or does that have enough corporate traffic to be sustainable? I also wonder if primary cause is the rise of Chinese airlines flying internationally...I know folks will want to point the finger at the Dao incident.
I also wonder where the Dreamliner is going to go...feel like UA has a lot of them but doesn’t necessarily do as well on long/thin routes that it should service. Maybe make SFO-AKL a a year-round route with downgauged/less frequent service during off peak season? |
Originally Posted by riphamilton
(Post 29152409)
first HGH, now XIY. brian sumers (all credit to him) tweeted a what is probably a screenshot of a UA internal memo that states XIY service will not return next summer:
https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...6c660350cd.jpg |
Originally Posted by PsiFighter37
(Post 29152434)
That sucks - it was a route I did want to try. Do folks think CTU will get chopped at some point as well, or does that have enough corporate traffic to be sustainable? I also wonder if primary cause is the rise of Chinese airlines flying internationally...I know folks will want to point the finger at the Dao incident.
I also wonder where the Dreamliner is going to go...feel like UA has a lot of them but doesn’t necessarily do as well on long/thin routes that it should service. Maybe make SFO-AKL a a year-round route with downgauged/less frequent service during off peak season? |
Originally Posted by krispykrme
(Post 29152447)
CTU is full of Apple employees in the front cabin.
|
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 29152464)
On GPUs? Probably the easiest long-haul upgrade in the UA system.
|
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 29152464)
On GPUs? Probably the easiest long-haul upgrade in the UA system.
I've found SFO-TPE to have pretty good R open on Tues/Wed..but I really only have an idea of ease-of-upgrade for flight routes I've traveled. I haven't spent much time investigating others for potential mileage run ops. But since I've got 8 GPUs to burn next year, no corporate travel, and a foreign address...if there are some decent longhauls with R that aren't too expensive maybe I could put together 2-3 MRs/travel trips. I looked briefly at an east asia to south america connection United trip for fun. For about $2k you can get ~30k miles. But you spend 33 hours traveling, and I didn't investigate if the EWR-<south america> leg could clear. |
It is weird that UA didn't mention XIY can also be served by connecting partner Juneyao Airlines with a connection at PVG. UA sells those tickets though.
|
"...with convenient connections at PEK (Beijing)." PEK is anything but convenient for connections.... Now that all these China flights are failing, can we get BKK back now please... |
Originally Posted by goodeats21
(Post 29153038)
LOL
PEK is anything but convenient for connections.... Now that all these China flights are failing, can we get BKK back now please... |
I took PVG-ORD flight after the cancellation of PVG-SFO on Monday. It was 2/3 empty. Perhaps, United does not want travelers to take its flight to China by pricing unreasonably high. For example, IAD-PEK, $1700 in economy, $1497 in Business one-way as part of round trip search. For travelling to PVG in February, the lowest fare is W. Nobody will buy this ticket unless you have to burn a GPU. |
Originally Posted by washeelers747
(Post 29153147)
completely agreed on PEK and BKK part. Does it mean United will decide to stop pursing China's 2nd-tier cities?
-RM |
Originally Posted by RobOnLI
(Post 29153228)
Haven't they already? HGH and XIY are gone. CTU really may not be that far behind. One corporate contract (Apple) does not save a flight from the chopping block.
-RM |
Originally Posted by spin88
(Post 29152436)
Hate to say I told you so, but I called this over two years ago: https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/25478610-post78.html I am sure I deserved some of the crud I took :o But United's damaged brand was simply not going to attract the kind of traffic ex-XIY to make this flight viable.
incidentally, since we are referencing posts several years old, at the time you seemed rather certain that SFO/LAX-BKK could not be done with a 787-9... since then, SFO-SIN, LAX-SIN and IAH-SYD all have been announced, each longer than SFO/LAX-BKK. |
Originally Posted by spin88
(Post 29152436)
Hate to say I told you so, but I called this over two years ago: https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/25478610-post78.html I am sure I deserved some of the crud I took :o But United's damaged brand was simply not going to attract the kind of traffic ex-XIY to make this flight viable.
At the airport on a Sat and my flight is 100% full. (Yes it's one data point lol) The brand is fine. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:26 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.