Community
Wiki Posts
Search

PEK-SFO moved to later in the day?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2017, 4:34 pm
  #1  
Suspended
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: LAX
Programs: AAdvantage EXPLAT, Hilton Diamond, SPG/Marriott Gold, IHG Platinum, Citi Exec MC, Amex Plat
Posts: 1,443
PEK-SFO moved to later in the day?

I noticed that PEK-SFO used to be a noontime departure (from flying it so much), but now it's a late afternoon departure. Is this so that the inbound from SFO can just do a quick turn in PEK instead of sitting for 20-22 hours?
matrixwalker2012 is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2017, 5:40 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 575
AND worse, they swapped a 772 for part of the upcoming schedule. YUCK. Hate that plane so much! (But not a lot of options if going to the west coast because ORD is also a 772, EWR is at least PMCO 772 but that's a lot of hours out of the way)
flyerbaby19 is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2017, 6:20 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,693
It switches to the later departure time (17:25 or 16:10 depending on season) on October 29. The arrival time doesn't change, looks like they're going to try to pull off a 2h turn in PEK.
mduell is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2017, 7:02 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: UA Million Mile, Mileage Plus Premier 1K, SkyMiles Gold Medallion, AAdvantage Gold
Posts: 875
Originally Posted by mduell
It switches to the later departure time (17:25 or 16:10 depending on season) on October 29. The arrival time doesn't change, looks like they're going to try to pull off a 2h turn in PEK.
Makes much more sense. A 2 hour turn is plenty of time for a 772. UA loses money by having the plane sit for hours at PEK. Any connections that can't make the new flight times can connect at ORD or EWR.
DA201 is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2017, 7:29 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,693
Originally Posted by DA201
A 2 hour turn is plenty of time for a 772.
Oh sure, just about anywhere, but PEK delays
Aussienarelle likes this.
mduell is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2017, 7:36 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: IND
Posts: 2,005
This will help utilizing 77W better.
bobbybrown is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2017, 7:38 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 11,461
Originally Posted by mduell
Oh sure, just about anywhere, but PEK delays
PEK delays tend to manifest on the outbound, though, so although I also doubt they'll routinely make 2h, it's not because it's not enough time.
fumje is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2017, 8:16 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: UA*Lifetime GS, Hyatt* Lifetime Globalist
Posts: 12,332
Originally Posted by flyerbaby19
I don't think I've ever been delayed PEK SFO and VV, and I fly this route a LOT. I once had a mx on PEK ORD, but other than that, United for me has been 100% on time with PEK. I travel PEK/SHA 3-4x per month and am delayed 95% of the time.

I always thought they prioritized international departures/arrivals. Also, most delays are military related and I don't think there's a base north of PEK so flights going that direction are probably more immune.
May be you are lucky. I fly at least twice a month and had a fair share of delays in the past 9 years when it was the 747. Only one MX, but delays more than an hour leaving PEK is common. Planes usually leave the gate on time but waiting to take off is a different story.
UA_Flyer is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2017, 8:28 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC
Programs: UA-1K MM, AA-Gold, DL-Silver, AS-MVP
Posts: 2,508
Originally Posted by flyerbaby19
I don't think I've ever been delayed PEK SFO and VV, and I fly this route a LOT. I once had a mx on PEK ORD, but other than that, United for me has been 100% on time with PEK. I travel PEK/SHA 3-4x per month and am delayed 95% of the time.

I always thought they prioritized international departures/arrivals. Also, most delays are military related and I don't think there's a base north of PEK so flights going that direction are probably more immune.
You are lucky, PEK doesn't prioritize based on airliner or destination. I'm 0 out of 6 for on-time departure out of PEK this year, no matter SFO, NRT, SHA or BKK.

Originally Posted by DA201
Makes much more sense. A 2 hour turn is plenty of time for a 772. UA loses money by having the plane sit for hours at PEK. Any connections that can't make the new flight times can connect at ORD or EWR.
2h is the current turnaround time for EWR-PEK-EWR. 2h20min for IAD-PEK-IAD for the 788 flight.

All of this is to keep the aircrafts utilized. Currently, only 77W overnights in PEK. pmUA 772 goes ORD-PEK-IAD, and IAD-PEK-ORD, and pmCO 772 goes EWR-PEK-EWR.

New schedule will only have the ORD-PEK 772 overnight. SFO-PEK, EWR-PEK, and IAD-PEK all do a ~2h turnaround.
hirohito888 is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2017, 10:34 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC
Programs: UA-1K MM, AA-Gold, DL-Silver, AS-MVP
Posts: 2,508
Originally Posted by flyerbaby19
I question if that is a true statement. There are well known destinations that are nearly always delayed (PEK/SZX is one example). PEK/SHA is pretty frequently delayed. It's almost always due to the military, and the destination definitely matters because the destination determines the flight path which determines which airspace gets shut down.
bolding mine

I've had delays where PEK will change runways or takeoff directions without advance notice. I had that twice in the last 12 months, once to SFO and NRT. On NRT flight, the flight was just on tarmac for 50min until they re-shuffled all the backlog.

On SFO flight, same thing happened, we were #2 for takeoff and PEK suddenly changed takeoff direction--no exception granted. The crew and flight planners had to file a new flight path and redo calculations because of takeoff direction. Flight paths are easier to re-file, but the issue was that the plane needed more fuel, and they also had to offload cargo in order to reduce takeoff weight.
hirohito888 is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2017, 11:05 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, AA, DL
Posts: 7,418
Originally Posted by hirohito888

On SFO flight, same thing happened, we were #2 for takeoff and PEK suddenly changed takeoff direction--no exception granted. The crew and flight planners had to file a new flight path and redo calculations because of takeoff direction. Flight paths are easier to re-file, but the issue was that the plane needed more fuel, and they also had to offload cargo in order to reduce takeoff weight.


I realize taking off to the south (vs north) will add a few nm to the route, but is it outside of the bounds of flexibility that they have?
drewguy is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2017, 12:05 pm
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 11,461
Originally Posted by drewguy
I realize taking off to the south (vs north) will add a few nm to the route, but is it outside of the bounds of flexibility that they have?
I would love to hear a pilot's comment, but my understanding is that although the fuel load is calculated to include some margin, they would not be allowed to 'use' that margin before taking off. I.e. if they refile the flight plan and the path distance is different, they are obliged to take on more fuel.
fumje is offline  
Old Oct 24, 2017, 12:24 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC
Programs: UA-1K MM, AA-Gold, DL-Silver, AS-MVP
Posts: 2,508
Originally Posted by drewguy
I realize taking off to the south (vs north) will add a few nm to the route, but is it outside of the bounds of flexibility that they have?
It's not about distance and direction. The winds determine the allowable weight for takeoff. It's much harder to take off with tailwind.

Cargo needs to be offloaded and fuel needs to be added because of inevitable tarmac delays in having everyone move around the airfield.
hirohito888 is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2017, 4:05 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: AVP & PEK
Programs: UA 1K 1.8MM
Posts: 6,349
When is SFO-PEK (UA888) reverting back to 777-200?

As title reads: When is SFO-PEK (UA888) reverting back to 777-200 Version 1?
Seems to be sometime in December/January?

And what is happening to those 777-300ER they are currently using?


Edit:
Or is it 747 to 777-300ER to 777-200 Version 1?


Edit 2:
Okay, looks like the change is happening December 1, 2017.

Edit 3:
It appears only temporary: switch from 777-300ER to 777-200 Version 1 from December 1, 2017 to & including January 17, 2018.

Last edited by narvik; Nov 13, 2017 at 4:35 pm
narvik is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2017, 4:53 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC
Programs: UA-1K MM, AA-Gold, DL-Silver, AS-MVP
Posts: 2,508
Originally Posted by narvik
As title reads: When is SFO-PEK (UA888) reverting back to 777-200 Version 1?
Seems to be sometime in December/January?

And what is happening to those 777-300ER they are currently using?


Edit:
Or is it 747 to 777-300ER to 777-200 Version 1?


Edit 2:
Okay, looks like the change is happening December 1, 2017.

Edit 3:
It appears only temporary: switch from 777-300ER to 777-200 Version 1 from December 1, 2017 to & including January 17, 2018.
According to the wiki in the thread: United 777-300ER Future Routes

SFO/PEK (UA 888/889) - Started September 6 (Except 01Dec to 18Jan, op by 772)
hirohito888 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.