Barely meeting 1K criteria--how close are others?
I've just finished booking my UA travel for the rest of 2017. As it stands now, I'll end with 100,075 PQM, and 12,012 PQD. I'm sure others have cut it closer--how close? Has anyone hit the mark(s) exactly?
This might be my last year as 1K, how sad! |
Originally Posted by tkc98110
(Post 28932891)
I've just finished booking my UA travel for the rest of 2017. As it stands now, I'll end with 100,075 PQM, and 12,012 PQD. I'm sure others have cut it closer--how close? Has anyone hit the mark(s) exactly?
This might be my last year as 1K, how sad! |
Already requalified in August. I fly for work every week and typically buy mid-tier (W) fares on trans-con routes.
|
Originally Posted by JHake10
(Post 28933140)
Already requalified in August. I fly for work every week and typically buy mid-tier (W) fares on trans-con routes.
For OP, I know someone who, before PQD, hit 100,007. |
I made the requirements with segments in July. Spend was met at the end of March. Mine are all last minute weekly domestic trips
|
My remaining travel is also booked for 2017. I will qualify with 105,013 but my PQD will squeak by with $12,002.
|
Originally Posted by Mikerascan
(Post 28933163)
My remaining travel is also booked for 2017. I will qualify with 105,013 but my PQD will squeak by with $12,002.
Lowest Xcess number, of people qualifying for 2018 1K status, wins--something! My Xcess number is projected to be 87. Mikerascan is projected to be 5,015. And to think, one year not so long ago I had >250,000 PQM. |
Originally Posted by tkc98110
(Post 28933215)
Perhaps we should have a contest-- (2017 final PQM-100,000) + (2017 final PQD-12,000)=Xcess.
Lowest Xcess number, of people qualifying for 2018 1K status, wins--something! My Xcess number is projected to be 87. Mikerascan is projected to be 5,015. And to think, one year not so long ago I had >250,000 PQM. is more reasonable IMO given the order of magnitude difference in requirements. Maybe even (2017 final PQM-100,000) * (100/12) * (2017 final PQD-12,000) = Xcess to really reward people who get close on both. |
Originally Posted by mduell
(Post 28933246)
(2017 final PQM-100,000) + (100/12) * (2017 final PQD-12,000) = Xcess
is more reasonable IMO given the order of magnitude difference in requirements. Maybe even (2017 final PQM-100,000) * (100/12) * (2017 final PQD-12,000) = Xcess to really reward people who get close on both. 175, using (2017 final PQM-100,000) + (100/12) * (2017 final PQD-12,000) = Xcess or 7,500, using (2017 final PQM-100,000) * (100/12) * (2017 final PQD-12,000) = Xcess Mikerascan would come in at 5030 or 83,550. I think a better weighted score might be to simply add up the percentages that you exceeded the 1K limit by for each criterion--so for me it's projected to be 0.075% (PQM) + 0.10% (PQD), totaling 0.175%. Less than 2/10ths of a percent in excess seems like a pretty close shave! |
Originally Posted by tkc98110
(Post 28932891)
I've just finished booking my UA travel for the rest of 2017. As it stands now, I'll end with 100,075 PQM, and 12,012 PQD.
I cleared PQD by pretty small margins the first two years it was implemented. Somehow that's more satisfying than clearing it by thousands (which will happen this year). |
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 28933453)
Awesome :)
I cleared PQD by pretty small margins the first two years it was implemented. Somehow that's more satisfying than clearing it by thousands (which will happen this year). |
I was pretty pleased last year at 102,052 and $12022 (2235 or 376200 by my metrics above).
This year I'll be halfway between gold and plat, too much non-UA flying. |
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 28933453)
Awesome :)
I cleared PQD by pretty small margins the first two years it was implemented. Somehow that's more satisfying than clearing it by thousands (which will happen this year). |
Originally Posted by findark
(Post 28933526)
Work pushed me to 17k last year, but I'll probably be running for the last bit this one. It really takes all the fun out of running for status when I'm basically cutting UA a check :(
|
Originally Posted by tkc98110
(Post 28933341)
I can see where this could get quite involved--I was keeping it simple. But, by mduell's 2 formulae, I'd be either
175, using (2017 final PQM-100,000) + (100/12) * (2017 final PQD-12,000) = Xcess or 7,500, using (2017 final PQM-100,000) * (100/12) * (2017 final PQD-12,000) = Xcess Mikerascan would come in at 5030 or 83,550. I think a better weighted score might be to simply add up the percentages that you exceeded the 1K limit by for each criterion--so for me it's projected to be 0.075% (PQM) + 0.10% (PQD), totaling 0.175%. Less than 2/10ths of a percent in excess seems like a pretty close shave! |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:26 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.