Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

WN to Hawaii - Impact on UA after increased capacity announcements

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

WN to Hawaii - Impact on UA after increased capacity announcements

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2017, 1:16 pm
  #46  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,019
Originally Posted by seenitall
...WN has had a long history of success w/o bankruptcies characteristic of CO and UA.
Exactly how does this fit in with bag fee discussion? You might as well have said "Southwest has orange planes" - just as much relevance. I was hardly drinking UA Kool-Aid - if you read my post, I didn't pick one over the other. I'm actually somewhat ambivalent about WN's future presence. I just said it'll be interesting to see what their fares will be. No need to get belligerent or project anything else into what I posted.
IAH-OIL-TRASH is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2017, 1:23 pm
  #47  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Carmel Valley(was Hawaii)
Programs: United 1K 2.7 MM
Posts: 1,174
[QUOTE=HNLbasedFlyer;2892809

But yes, the ability to get lie-flat seats on UA or a as a backup economy plus will trump at least for me as a Hawaii resident SWA[/QUOTE]

Except from HNL, there don't seem to be lie flat seats from the outer islands next year, at least Kauai.
mmack is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2017, 1:26 pm
  #48  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: JAX
Programs: UA Plat MM, AA Gold MM, Marriott LTT, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 3,770
WN won't help with airfare from East Coast to HI. I was looking at mid-December RIC-LIH and the lowest fare I found on UA is ~$1600+, most flights are >$2000. I can go RIC-PVG for that fare.
CIT85 is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2017, 1:28 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: UA, AA, Skywards, Qantas
Posts: 35
Claims of wider seats on a 737 are just measuring tricks. The cabins are all the same width. The 32" pitch claim is also dubious. Effective pitch since WN slimlined is 31" or less.
Completely false. You don't know better than Seatguru and you sure don't know more than my knees.

If you don't want to fly them don't. But don't lie about them. I take their 800s from BWI to STL frequently.

Last edited by cairns; Oct 13, 2017 at 1:37 pm
cairns is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2017, 1:35 pm
  #50  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Programs: WN, AA, UA, DL
Posts: 1,313
Originally Posted by Kacee
The 32" pitch claim is also dubious. Effective pitch since WN slimlined is 31" or less.
It's not dubious, and the slimline adjustment goes the other way.

It's easy to see and feel the 32" even against the 31" in their 73Gs. WN's 738s are arguably the best domestic narrowbody ride in Y-. The room over the now standard 30" feels huge. Add on the Sky interior, live TV, and the best complementary snacks, and it's really nice. Only major miss is the lack of power.
minnyfly is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2017, 2:07 pm
  #51  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
Originally Posted by cairns
Completely false. You don't know better than Seatguru and you sure don't know more than my knees.

If you don't want to fly them don't. But don't lie about them. I take their 800s from BWI to STL frequently.
How about 1/2 entirely correct, and 1/2 not correct. Pitch figures are accurate, as its an objective measure. If any airline lied about it, it would be fraud. While a "slim-line" seat with 31" pitch may be claimed to feel like a 32" pitch, the pitch is still 31" and that is what is reported. You have 1" more pitch, and whether it is "used" by a thicker seat, or gives more distance between the seat back in front is an issue of seat design, not the measurement.

This is very different than "seat width" as there is no set measurement. Some airlines (see UA, SWA) have tried to game the system by making the arm rests narrower while keeping a wider seat cushion, but it does not impact the actual space you get. Other really horrible bottom of the barrel airlines (UA at 3-4-3 ) have made the aisles narrower by 1" on wide bodies, which allows them to claim slightly larger seats.

Seat Guru's width measurements are wrong/misleading in some cases.

The physical constraints of cabin width defines how much "effective space" there is, which is arm rests+seat cushion. For various aircraft this space is :

-A380 (at 10x, lower deck) has 21.8”/seat (at 8x, upper deck) has 23.8"/seat
-777 (at 9x) has 21.3"/seat
-763 (at 7x) has 21.2”/seat
-A319/320/321 ceo and neo (at 6x) has 21.2”/seat

-A330/330neo (at 8x) has 20.8"/seat
- A350 (at 9x) has 20.3”/seat
-747 (at 10x) has 20.2”/seat
-737/757/737MAX (at 6x) has 20”/seat

-787 (at 9x) has 19.8"/seat
-777x (at 10x) has 19.7/seat
-777 (at 10x, using 18” aisles as UA is, which is why they are so narrow) has 19.4”/seat
spin88 is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2017, 2:12 pm
  #52  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
Originally Posted by fly18725
Unless Southwest starts flying redeyes, either from Hawaii or the CONUS, convenient connections to Hawaii will be very limited beyond the west coast and won't exist for the east coast.
Unlike Jeffy "penny wise, pound foolish" Smisik and his doppleganger Scott "I'm not the drunk one" Kirby and their cost cutting ways, SWA has invested $500M in a new reservation system, see https://www.bizjournals.com/denver/n...tem-means.html which is coming on line now, and so far has been a rather uneventful change over.

Part of this is to be able to run red-eyes. Absent a red-eye turn, aircraft scheduling to Hawaii is very difficult, and I have no doubt that like with most other carriers, some (perhaps most) of the returns on WN will be red-eyes. The time change combined with the distance, plus he need to have later depatures to allow for connecting flow, make red-eyes just a fact of life for much Hawaii traffic.
spin88 is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2017, 2:43 pm
  #53  
LIH
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: ORD | LGA | 2E
Programs: UA GS 1.6MM UC | AA CK 0.7MM AC | Bonvoy Ambassador | Hyatt Globalist | Hertz PC
Posts: 1,053
Now that I'm not based on the west coast the often lie-flat configuration from DEN <> LIH is part of what keeps me loyal to UA. Since I have to connect somewhere no matter what I prefer the flight time/distance from DEN as opposed to SFO/LAX as well, especially on the red eyes on the way home when an extra hour of sleep can make a big difference.

This is also a route where I'm sure most of the up-front space is actually sold (or at least converts miles at a pretty expensive rate) so I'm not sure how much more competition in Y fares is going to make UA retreat or anything. I remember days of $400-500 RT west coast <> outer islands. I haven't seen those type of fare sales/battles for quite a number of years.
LIH is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2017, 3:11 pm
  #54  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,361
Originally Posted by spin88
Unlike Jeffy "penny wise, pound foolish" Smisik and his doppleganger Scott "I'm not the drunk one" Kirby and their cost cutting ways, SWA has invested $500M in a new reservation system, see https://www.bizjournals.com/denver/n...tem-means.html which is coming on line now, and so far has been a rather uneventful change over.

Part of this is to be able to run red-eyes. Absent a red-eye turn, aircraft scheduling to Hawaii is very difficult, and I have no doubt that like with most other carriers, some (perhaps most) of the returns on WN will be red-eyes. The time change combined with the distance, plus he need to have later depatures to allow for connecting flow, make red-eyes just a fact of life for much Hawaii traffic.
The old reservation system did not prevent Southwest from running red eyes.
fly18725 is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2017, 3:22 pm
  #55  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,019
Originally Posted by spin88
...Absent a red-eye turn, aircraft scheduling to Hawaii is very difficult, and I have no doubt that like with most other carriers, some (perhaps most) of the returns on WN will be red-eyes. The time change combined with the distance, plus he need to have later depatures to allow for connecting flow, make red-eyes just a fact of life for much Hawaii traffic.
I agree for partially another reason. Aircraft utilization (combined with scheduling/connections) is also a main driver of red-eyes. Hawaii redeyes are great for increasing utilization for aircraft that would otherwise be parked overnight on/near Left Coast. Early morning departures ex-California and same day return would actually require WN to add more aircraft.
IAH-OIL-TRASH is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2017, 3:41 pm
  #56  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: HNL
Programs: UA GS4MM, MR LT Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,447
I've read a lot of the comments on no change fees. I can speak from experience that the UA flights are almost 100% going out full to SF (I'm hard pressed to remember a non-full flight and I go every single week HNL-SFO. The change fee argument is moot if the SWA flights are full and you can't get a seat - unless they flood the market with flights, the ability to change flights might end up very limited unless the change is several days out.
HNLbasedFlyer is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2017, 8:27 pm
  #57  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,450
Originally Posted by seenitall
seat pitch at almost E+
Sorry, you lost me there. It's not even close.

Originally Posted by cairns
If you don't want to fly them don't. But don't lie about them. I take their 800s from BWI to STL frequently.
Congrats. I fly them pretty frequently, including yesterday, b/c it's 45 minutes extra for me to cross the bay. If you think 32" pitch on WN is the same as 32" pitch on SQ you're delusional.
Kacee is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2017, 9:56 pm
  #58  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: ORD
Programs: Marriott Titanium Elite, UA Silver, AA Gold
Posts: 494
Originally Posted by TBD


UA has 2 x 752 just for today SFO-LIH.
Yep. About 48 lie-flat seats offered today in/out of LIH.
SPLITTERZ is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2017, 10:34 pm
  #59  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 3,360
Originally Posted by IAH-OIL-TRASH
The value of this for Hawaii-bound vacation travelers is worth about zero in their calculation. The argument of legacy airlines vs WN will go on forever.
I used to work at Walt Disney World in the Reservations Center. Pretty much all of our clientele were leisure travelers. As seenitall notes, many leisure travelers make changes to reservations because they tend to book far in advance just to hold something. As trips get closer, many of those families will make changes to the itinerary once arrangements like work schedules and house/pet-sitters are finalized.

The ability to adjust flights without paying a change fee is huge for those types of travelers.

Originally Posted by HNLbasedFlyer
I've read a lot of the comments on no change fees. I can speak from experience that the UA flights are almost 100% going out full to SF (I'm hard pressed to remember a non-full flight and I go every single week HNL-SFO. The change fee argument is moot if the SWA flights are full and you can't get a seat - unless they flood the market with flights, the ability to change flights might end up very limited unless the change is several days out.
As noted above, leisure travelers will make changes to flights weeks or even months in advance. As such, the ability to make free changes is still a valid perk. Although, since Southwest is more leisure-oriented, it still may be a challenge finding seats on a different flight.
writerguyfl is offline  
Old Oct 13, 2017, 10:59 pm
  #60  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: Mileage Plus 1K; Marriott Platinum; Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,355
Originally Posted by TBD


UA has 2 x 752 just for today SFO-LIH.
If you look ahead in the schedule, these 752s downgauge into 738s. I was looking around Valentine's Day for the weekend.
transportprof is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.