WN to Hawaii - Impact on UA after increased capacity announcements
#46
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,019
Exactly how does this fit in with bag fee discussion? You might as well have said "Southwest has orange planes" - just as much relevance. I was hardly drinking UA Kool-Aid - if you read my post, I didn't pick one over the other. I'm actually somewhat ambivalent about WN's future presence. I just said it'll be interesting to see what their fares will be. No need to get belligerent or project anything else into what I posted.
#47
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Carmel Valley(was Hawaii)
Programs: United 1K 2.7 MM
Posts: 1,174
[QUOTE=HNLbasedFlyer;2892809
But yes, the ability to get lie-flat seats on UA or a as a backup economy plus will trump at least for me as a Hawaii resident SWA[/QUOTE]
Except from HNL, there don't seem to be lie flat seats from the outer islands next year, at least Kauai.
But yes, the ability to get lie-flat seats on UA or a as a backup economy plus will trump at least for me as a Hawaii resident SWA[/QUOTE]
Except from HNL, there don't seem to be lie flat seats from the outer islands next year, at least Kauai.
#48
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: JAX
Programs: UA Plat MM, AA Gold MM, Marriott LTT, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 3,770
WN won't help with airfare from East Coast to HI. I was looking at mid-December RIC-LIH and the lowest fare I found on UA is ~$1600+, most flights are >$2000. I can go RIC-PVG for that fare.
#49
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: UA, AA, Skywards, Qantas
Posts: 35
Claims of wider seats on a 737 are just measuring tricks. The cabins are all the same width. The 32" pitch claim is also dubious. Effective pitch since WN slimlined is 31" or less.
If you don't want to fly them don't. But don't lie about them. I take their 800s from BWI to STL frequently.
Last edited by cairns; Oct 13, 2017 at 1:37 pm
#50
Join Date: Apr 2011
Programs: WN, AA, UA, DL
Posts: 1,313
It's easy to see and feel the 32" even against the 31" in their 73Gs. WN's 738s are arguably the best domestic narrowbody ride in Y-. The room over the now standard 30" feels huge. Add on the Sky interior, live TV, and the best complementary snacks, and it's really nice. Only major miss is the lack of power.
#51
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
This is very different than "seat width" as there is no set measurement. Some airlines (see UA, SWA) have tried to game the system by making the arm rests narrower while keeping a wider seat cushion, but it does not impact the actual space you get. Other really horrible bottom of the barrel airlines (UA at 3-4-3 ) have made the aisles narrower by 1" on wide bodies, which allows them to claim slightly larger seats.
Seat Guru's width measurements are wrong/misleading in some cases.
The physical constraints of cabin width defines how much "effective space" there is, which is arm rests+seat cushion. For various aircraft this space is :
-A380 (at 10x, lower deck) has 21.8”/seat (at 8x, upper deck) has 23.8"/seat
-777 (at 9x) has 21.3"/seat
-763 (at 7x) has 21.2”/seat
-A319/320/321 ceo and neo (at 6x) has 21.2”/seat
-A330/330neo (at 8x) has 20.8"/seat
- A350 (at 9x) has 20.3”/seat
-747 (at 10x) has 20.2”/seat
-737/757/737MAX (at 6x) has 20”/seat
-787 (at 9x) has 19.8"/seat
-777x (at 10x) has 19.7/seat
-777 (at 10x, using 18” aisles as UA is, which is why they are so narrow) has 19.4”/seat
#52
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
Part of this is to be able to run red-eyes. Absent a red-eye turn, aircraft scheduling to Hawaii is very difficult, and I have no doubt that like with most other carriers, some (perhaps most) of the returns on WN will be red-eyes. The time change combined with the distance, plus he need to have later depatures to allow for connecting flow, make red-eyes just a fact of life for much Hawaii traffic.
#53
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: ORD | LGA | 2E
Programs: UA GS 1.6MM UC | AA CK 0.7MM AC | Bonvoy Ambassador | Hyatt Globalist | Hertz PC
Posts: 1,053
Now that I'm not based on the west coast the often lie-flat configuration from DEN <> LIH is part of what keeps me loyal to UA. Since I have to connect somewhere no matter what I prefer the flight time/distance from DEN as opposed to SFO/LAX as well, especially on the red eyes on the way home when an extra hour of sleep can make a big difference.
This is also a route where I'm sure most of the up-front space is actually sold (or at least converts miles at a pretty expensive rate) so I'm not sure how much more competition in Y fares is going to make UA retreat or anything. I remember days of $400-500 RT west coast <> outer islands. I haven't seen those type of fare sales/battles for quite a number of years.
This is also a route where I'm sure most of the up-front space is actually sold (or at least converts miles at a pretty expensive rate) so I'm not sure how much more competition in Y fares is going to make UA retreat or anything. I remember days of $400-500 RT west coast <> outer islands. I haven't seen those type of fare sales/battles for quite a number of years.
#54
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,361
Unlike Jeffy "penny wise, pound foolish" Smisik and his doppleganger Scott "I'm not the drunk one" Kirby and their cost cutting ways, SWA has invested $500M in a new reservation system, see https://www.bizjournals.com/denver/n...tem-means.html which is coming on line now, and so far has been a rather uneventful change over.
Part of this is to be able to run red-eyes. Absent a red-eye turn, aircraft scheduling to Hawaii is very difficult, and I have no doubt that like with most other carriers, some (perhaps most) of the returns on WN will be red-eyes. The time change combined with the distance, plus he need to have later depatures to allow for connecting flow, make red-eyes just a fact of life for much Hawaii traffic.
Part of this is to be able to run red-eyes. Absent a red-eye turn, aircraft scheduling to Hawaii is very difficult, and I have no doubt that like with most other carriers, some (perhaps most) of the returns on WN will be red-eyes. The time change combined with the distance, plus he need to have later depatures to allow for connecting flow, make red-eyes just a fact of life for much Hawaii traffic.
#55
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,019
...Absent a red-eye turn, aircraft scheduling to Hawaii is very difficult, and I have no doubt that like with most other carriers, some (perhaps most) of the returns on WN will be red-eyes. The time change combined with the distance, plus he need to have later depatures to allow for connecting flow, make red-eyes just a fact of life for much Hawaii traffic.
#56
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: HNL
Programs: UA GS4MM, MR LT Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,447
I've read a lot of the comments on no change fees. I can speak from experience that the UA flights are almost 100% going out full to SF (I'm hard pressed to remember a non-full flight and I go every single week HNL-SFO. The change fee argument is moot if the SWA flights are full and you can't get a seat - unless they flood the market with flights, the ability to change flights might end up very limited unless the change is several days out.
#57
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,450
Sorry, you lost me there. It's not even close.
Congrats. I fly them pretty frequently, including yesterday, b/c it's 45 minutes extra for me to cross the bay. If you think 32" pitch on WN is the same as 32" pitch on SQ you're delusional.
Congrats. I fly them pretty frequently, including yesterday, b/c it's 45 minutes extra for me to cross the bay. If you think 32" pitch on WN is the same as 32" pitch on SQ you're delusional.
#59
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 3,360
The ability to adjust flights without paying a change fee is huge for those types of travelers.
I've read a lot of the comments on no change fees. I can speak from experience that the UA flights are almost 100% going out full to SF (I'm hard pressed to remember a non-full flight and I go every single week HNL-SFO. The change fee argument is moot if the SWA flights are full and you can't get a seat - unless they flood the market with flights, the ability to change flights might end up very limited unless the change is several days out.
#60
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: Mileage Plus 1K; Marriott Platinum; Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,355