Hardcore approach to turning off wireless devices
#46
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brunei
Programs: Enrich Sapphire. Kris Flyer Silver.Le Club Accorhotels,Starwood.
Posts: 2,201
Why make stupid announcements after that?
#48
In a word, no. For a device to function as a hotspot it must have both a valid cellular Internet connection and wifi to broadcast it. While there could in theory be a brief interval after the cellular connection is turned off that the wifi signal might still be visible, turning on airplane mode shuts off ALL antennas on a device. The user can then turn wifi and Bluetooth back on when appropriate.
.
.
#49
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: BOS
Programs: Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott/SPG/Hilton Gold, PreCheck + Clear
Posts: 2,306
Of course none of us was there in this case.
#51
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: MFR
Programs: UA 1K 1.9MM, Hilton Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 2,879
On the SFO->BOS late flight yesterday, after the announcement to turn off cellular devices, one male FA announced specific devices that needed to be turned off: "Fred's Samsung....." A few minutes later, he listed them again by name and then said, "If they are not turned off, they will be reported to the FAA."
Never heard this before. I assume, he was just looking at the list of devices that appear when you search for hotspots. I have mixed feelings. Having rules that you don't enforce tends to breed dis-regard for all rules. This did seem a bit harsh though......
Never heard this before. I assume, he was just looking at the list of devices that appear when you search for hotspots. I have mixed feelings. Having rules that you don't enforce tends to breed dis-regard for all rules. This did seem a bit harsh though......
#52
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: Rapid Rewards, AAdvantage, SkyMiles
Posts: 2,931
A simple "Please turn your phones on to airplane mode" or even jokingly but kind of seriously making up a name and device like "Fred please turn off your Samsung Galaxy S8" is fine. Adding in "Report you to the FAA" or "Add your name to the no-fly list" are unprofessional and unnecessary. I would report any FA who says that.
#53
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 4,374
#55
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,882
on many flights that I'm on that think the rules don't apply to them - cell phone in airplane mode and otherwise.
#56
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,965
I think the electronic device thing is getting out of hand. A lot of people actually text all the way to takeoff (and more) and many people's devices start to ding/ring on final approach. Worse yet, some actually talk on the phone. Or, they text back and forth without putting their phone on silent or vibrate.
I think by now we know it is not a huge risk when it comes to interfering with the plane. However, rules are rules and, if you want to cheat, at least put them on silent/vibrate.
I have no problem with the FAs being somewhat militant enforcing the rules - the problem is really too many FAs don't enforce any rules - people have huge "hand held" devices and leaving devices plugged in during takeoff/landing.
I think by now we know it is not a huge risk when it comes to interfering with the plane. However, rules are rules and, if you want to cheat, at least put them on silent/vibrate.
I have no problem with the FAs being somewhat militant enforcing the rules - the problem is really too many FAs don't enforce any rules - people have huge "hand held" devices and leaving devices plugged in during takeoff/landing.
#57
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Orange County, CA, USA
Programs: AA (Life Plat), Marriott (Life Titanium) and every other US program
Posts: 6,411
#58
Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL Area
Programs: Delta SkySponge ExtraAbsorbent, SPG Gold
Posts: 29,988
This is all so stupid. Your electronic devices will not harm the aircraft in any way. There would be planes falling out off the sky left and right if they did. Do any of you really think the aircraft manufacturers and the regulatory agencies trust passengers to turn off their devices? Of course not. Therefore any sensitive equipment is sheielded from any interference. It's just a leftover rule from the early days that the old wind-bags at airlines like AA and UA still gripe about.
#59
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Brunei
Programs: Enrich Sapphire. Kris Flyer Silver.Le Club Accorhotels,Starwood.
Posts: 2,201
This is all so stupid. Your electronic devices will not harm the aircraft in any way. There would be planes falling out off the sky left and right if they did. Do any of you really think the aircraft manufacturers and the regulatory agencies trust passengers to turn off their devices? Of course not. Therefore any sensitive equipment is sheielded from any interference. It's just a leftover rule from the early days that the old wind-bags at airlines like AA and UA still gripe about.
Example: Malaysian FAA have a general ruling (maybe outdated) that phones and devices must be turned off during taxing, take off and landing. The airliners follow this to the letter of the law.
In China, all mobile phones, tablets and lap tops must be turned off for the entire duration of a flight from the time you board till you land (please correct me if the rules have changed)>
#60
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: where lions are led by donkeys...
Programs: Lifetime Gold, Global Entry, Hertz PC, and my wallet
Posts: 20,340
Whether it is stupid or not, or whether we agree with it or not, why can't people just do as they are told? A tremendous sense of entitlement abounds in this day and age.