Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Aug 26, 2017, 4:13 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: WineCountryUA
Archive thread What Route(s) do You Wish UA Flew? [Archive thread]

Thanks, United forum Moderators.

Print Wikipost

What Route(s) do you wish UA Flew?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Yesterday, 9:23 pm
  #256  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Alexandria, Longboat Key
Programs: UA Gold Marriott Gold AA Gold Choice Gold Wyndham PLAT IHG PLAT Avis President's Club Amtrak Select
Posts: 2,263
Originally Posted by sonyeoshin
I'd like to see
EWR-ICN
GUM-ICN
LAX-ICN
ORD-ICN
UA could have considered EWR-ICN but doubled down on SFO-ICN. Ditto for ORD-ICN. Korean Air, for a long period of time, even when they were the avoid at all costs airline given safety, have dominated US-South Korean flying, one of the reasons why the DOJ refuses to consider their merger with Asiana despite all of the other important regulatory agencies approving after concessions. LAX-ICN would not have Russian air space issues. If the Korean/Asiana merger goes through and reduces LAX-ICN traffic, maybe UA will consider it. GUM-ICN using Air Mike might not be the most competitive product offered even if they are competing with LCCs in South Korea but the demand is there may be worth the shot especially if UA is willing to flex using Air Mike on future NRT-CEB.
SPN Lifer likes this.
Longboater is offline  
Old Yesterday, 11:20 pm
  #257  
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: SFO
Posts: 224
Originally Posted by Longboater
UA could have considered EWR-ICN but doubled down on SFO-ICN. Ditto for ORD-ICN. Korean Air, for a long period of time, even when they were the avoid at all costs airline given safety, have dominated US-South Korean flying, one of the reasons why the DOJ refuses to consider their merger with Asiana despite all of the other important regulatory agencies approving after concessions. LAX-ICN would not have Russian air space issues. If the Korean/Asiana merger goes through and reduces LAX-ICN traffic, maybe UA will consider it.
These are good points. KE is larger than OZ and DL has more routes to ICN than any other US carrier, so Skyteam traffic dominates that market. If the merger goes through, this would be a loss for *A network and for its users. Either way, ORD-ICN on *A would be a very good addition as that isn't covered yet, with LAX/EWR being considered if that merger does go through anyway.
Worth mentioning, Air Premia (YP) has entered the US market so at least there is more competition in this market.

Originally Posted by Longboater
GUM-ICN using Air Mike might not be the most competitive product offered even if they are competing with LCCs in South Korea but the demand is there may be worth the shot especially if UA is willing to flex using Air Mike on future NRT-CEB.
The entire 738 fleet including the GUM/Air Mike units are being retrofitted with NEXT interiors, with one GUM plane currently being converted. Although this is a complicated process, by a few years UA should have a more competitive product by then as the project finishes.
SPN Lifer likes this.
sonyeoshin is offline  
Old Today, 1:35 am
  #258  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Amsterdam
Programs: MileagePlus GS
Posts: 362
United needs to launch DEN-AMS. It was rumored to launch right before COVID.
texas gold is offline  
Old Today, 3:26 am
  #259  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: United Arab Emirates & Arizona, USA
Programs: UA MM/1P, EK Au, QR, TK, Marriott Life Ti, Hilton Dia, IC Dia, Hyatt Glob, Accor Pt, Shangri-La
Posts: 4,525
Originally Posted by Nayef
I don't remember if I or anyone else mentioned this wishlist route before, but DEN-DXB would be the dream.
Agree. Emirates (getting off-topic) hasn't added a U.S. destination in awhile (and dropped FLL) and I am always hoping they would serve DEN, PHX, or LAS. United DEN-DXB would be even better, opening up connections to the southwest as more convenient options from DXB than backtracking from LAX/SFO or trudging through ORD/IAH only to face a three-hour connection, or more if on UA to EWR. Although UA's tie-up with Emirates is limited, having a second feeder would be nice, though maybe not in Emirates' interest.
ContinentalFan likes this.
mecabq is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.