Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Woman arrested at SEA after refusing to move bag to OHB & then throwing walker

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Woman arrested at SEA after refusing to move bag to OHB & then throwing walker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 2017, 3:19 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ZRH / SEA, DL PM
Posts: 1,163
Woman arrested at SEA after refusing to move bag to OHB & then throwing walker

http://www.kiro7.com/news/local/woma...ight/564100335

<<< The flight crew told the mother and daughter to put a bag that was under the seat in the overhead bin, but the two refused.

According to the spokesman, there was a language barrier, but the spokesman did not say whether that was at the core of the issue.

A crew member called police, who told everyone to get off the plane – including the two women.

Police took the women to a confined place, because they believed it was safe for everyone. At one point, the daughter got upset and threw the mom’s walker while in an office. >>>
AntonS is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2017, 3:21 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ewa Beach, Hawaii
Posts: 10,909
Never heard of being forced to put in overhead, usually they want you to put under the seat. Unless it was too big for under the seat. But sounds like may have been arrested for the antics after being taken away.
Baze is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2017, 3:31 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: TPE
Programs: UA Gold, HA Premier, Hertz #1 Gold PC, SBUX Gold
Posts: 603
Wasn't one of the concrete changes Oscar announced after the Dao incident that UA would never again use law enforcement to deplane passengers except in security incidents? While incorrectly stored bagged is security related, I still think FAs probably escalated things by calling LE.
gradsflyer is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2017, 3:31 pm
  #4  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: LAX, EWR, LHR
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 227
Could be sitting in the bulkhead or their bad was too big to fit completely under the seat in front of them.
FL390 is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2017, 3:35 pm
  #5  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by gradsflyer
Wasn't one of the concrete changes Oscar announced after the Dao incident that UA would never again use law enforcement to deplane passengers except in security incidents?
Policy now (and not just at UA; OALs have the same) is to simply deplane everyone. LEOs/Airport security whatevers generally show up to observe in those scenarios just in case, but not to enforce the plane emptying out.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2017, 3:51 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: New York, NY, USA
Posts: 12,482
They were likely in bulkhead or exit row. Passengers from some countries are uncomfortable with their belonging being out of sight. Might have to do with environment at home.
TerryK is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2017, 4:15 pm
  #7  
Moderator: United Airlines
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,850
Note this was yesterday -- July 18, 2017

KING5 is reporting
Airport police boarded the plane to talk to the two women, but then decided to evacuate the entire plane. The women were taken to a nearby United office, DeRoy said.

The airline originally planned to offer them a refund, but "something happened" and the 53-year-old threw her mother's walker.

She was arrested for malicious mischief
and Q13 Fox is reporting

According to an airport official, a woman in her 80s and her adult daughter were asked by a United Airlines flight crew to move one of their bags. The bag was apparently too large to fit underneath the seat in front of them, so the crew asked them to move it to an overhead bin.

.....

The mother and daughter were taken to an airport office to sort things out.

The official said the daughter become upset and threw her mother's walker in the office. At that point, police arrested her for malicious mischief and she was taken to jail
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2017, 4:19 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
Originally Posted by FL390
Could be sitting in the bulkhead or their bad was too big to fit completely under the seat in front of them.
Exactly my thought upon seeing the thread title. It's sticking out and blocking the space by their feet. If the FAs see something like that they will insist that it goes in the bins.
Loren Pechtel is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2017, 4:50 pm
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
1. UA followed its stated policy even though it didn't apply. The passengers were offloaded and the two passengers who were violating UA's safety & security policy were dealt with.

2. The policy did not apply because this was a safety & security issue. Put in its simplest terms, if the bag does not fit fully under the seat in front of the passenger associated with it, it goes to the OH (or is checked). The aircraft isn't going to push until it is dealt with.

This is an example of how the Dao incident works to the detriment of everyone. No crewmember in their right mind is going to reach down and grab the bag and be accused of brushing past and thereby assaulting the woman or her daughter, so however many pax are delayed, people are delayed on the next flight and so on.

Good on UA for doing it the right way and a pity that it's come to this.
Often1 is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2017, 7:56 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ORD
Programs: AA EXP & million miler
Posts: 3,992
Originally Posted by Often1
This is an example of how the Dao incident works to the detriment of everyone. No crewmember in their right mind is going to reach down and grab the bag and be accused of brushing past and thereby assaulting the woman or her daughter, so however many pax are delayed, people are delayed on the next flight and so on.

Good on UA for doing it the right way and a pity that it's come to this.
Heartily agree.
masonp123 is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2017, 8:08 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: Mileage Plus 1K; Marriott Platinum; Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,355
Anyone who throws a walker around an airline's office space does not belong on an aircraft that's flying commercially.
transportprof is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2017, 8:13 pm
  #12  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,139
Originally Posted by transportprof
Anyone who throws a walker around an airline's office space does not belong on an aircraft that's flying commercially.
They don't belong in a private aircraft either.
mahasamatman is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2017, 8:26 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Programs: UA 1K, AA Lifetime Platinum, DL Platinum, Honors Diamond, Bonvoy Titanium, Hertz Platinum
Posts: 7,969
Originally Posted by sbm12
Policy now (and not just at UA; OALs have the same) is to simply deplane everyone. LEOs/Airport security whatevers generally show up to observe in those scenarios just in case, but not to enforce the plane emptying out.
... and, if the offending passengers still refuse to get out of their seats, then the forced removal process is out of view of the other passengers and their cellphone cameras.
Steve M is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2017, 8:39 pm
  #14  
Moderator: Budget Travel forum & Credit Card Programs, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYJ/YVR and back on Van Isle ....... for now
Programs: UA lifetime MM / *A Gold
Posts: 14,428
Originally Posted by Steve M
... and, if the offending passengers still refuse to get out of their seats, then the forced removal process is out of view of the other passengers and their cellphone cameras.
EXACTLY what I was thinking @:-)

You beat me to posting that
EmailKid is online now  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.