Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Man pulled off of overbooked flight UA3411 (ORD-SDF) 9 Apr 2017 {Settlement reached}

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Apr 10, 2017, 8:42 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: WineCountryUA
WELCOME, THREAD GUIDELINES and SUMMARY PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

If you are new to us, welcome to FlyerTalk! Who we are: FlyerTalk features discussions and chat boards that cover the most up-to-date traveler information; an interactive community dedicated to the topic of travel (not politics or arguments about politics or religion, etc. – those discussion are best in the OMNI forum)

The incident discussed in this thread has touched a nerve for many, and many posters are passionate about their opinions and concerns. However we should still have a civil and respectful discussion of this topic. This is because FlyerTalk is meant to be a friendly, helpful, and collegial community. (Rule 12.)

1. The normal FlyerTalk Rules apply. (Including not discussing moderation actions in thread). Please be particularly attentive to "discussing the idea and not the poster" when you have a disagreement. Civility and mutual respect are still expected and are what we owe each other as a community.

2. You are expected to respect the FlyerTalk community's diversity, and therefore refrain from posting inflammatory comments about race, religion, culture, politics, ethnicity, sexual orientation, etc. Do not cite, copy, or report on such.

3. While you can disagree with an opinion, the holder of that opinion has the same right to their opinion as you have to yours. We request all to respect that and disagree or discuss their point of views without getting overly personal and without attacking the other poster(s). This is expected as a requirement in FT Rule 12.

4. Overly exaggerative posts as well as posts with information that has been posted several times previously may be summarily deleted.

5. In addition, those who repeatedly fail to comply with FlyerTalk Rules, may be subjected to FlyerTalk disciplinary actions and, e.g., have membership privileges suspended, or masked from this forum.

If you have questions about the Rules or concerns about what another has posted in this or other threads in this forum, please do not post about that. Rather, notify the moderators by using the alert symbol within each post or email or send a private message to us moderators.

Let’s have this discussion in a way that, when we look back on it, we can be proud of how we handled ourselves as a community.

The United Moderator team:
J.Edward
l'etoile
Ocn Vw 1K
Pat89339
WineCountryUA

N.B. PLEASE do not alter the contents of this moderator note
Statement from United Airlines Regarding Resolution with Dr. David Dao - released 27 April 2017
CHICAGO, April 27, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- We are pleased to report that United and Dr. Dao have reached an amicable resolution of the unfortunate incident that occurred aboard flight 3411. We look forward to implementing the improvements we have announced, which will put our customers at the center of everything we do.
DOT findings related to the UA3411 9 April 2017 IDB incident 12 May 2017

What facts do we know?
  • UA3411, operated by Republic Airways, ORD-SDF on Sunday, April 9, 2017. UA3411 was the second to last flight to SDF for United. AA3509 and UA4771 were the two remaining departures for the day. Also, AA and DL had connecting options providing for same-day arrival in SDF.
  • After the flight was fully boarded, United determined four seats were needed to accommodate crew to SDF for a flight on Monday.
  • United solicited volunteers for VDB. (BUT stopped at $800 in UA$s, not cash). Chose not to go to the levels such as 1350 that airlines have been known to go even in case of weather impacted disruption)
  • After receiving no volunteers for $800 vouchers, a passenger volunteered for $1,600 and was "laughed at" and refused, United determined four passengers to be removed from the flight.
  • One passenger refused and Chicago Aviation Security Officers were called to forcibly remove the passenger.
  • The passenger hit the armrest in the aisle and received a concussion, a broken nose, a bloodied lip, and the loss of two teeth.
  • After being removed from the plane, the passenger re-boarded saying "I need to go home" repeatedly, before being removed again.
  • United spokesman Jonathan Guerin said the flight was sold out — but not oversold. Instead, United and regional affiliate Republic Airlines – the unit that operated Flight 3411 – decided they had to remove four passengers from the flight to accommodate crewmembers who were needed in Louisville the next day for a “downline connection.”

United Express Flight 3411 Review and Action Report - released 27 April 2017

Videos

Internal Communication by Oscar Munoz
Oscar Munoz sent an internal communication to UA employees (sources: View From The Wing, Chicago Tribune):
Dear Team,

Like you, I was upset to see and hear about what happened last night aboard United Express Flight 3411 headed from Chicago to Louisville. While the facts and circumstances are still evolving, especially with respect to why this customer defied Chicago Aviation Security Officers the way he did, to give you a clearer picture of what transpired, I've included below a recap from the preliminary reports filed by our employees.

As you will read, this situation was unfortunately compounded when one of the passengers we politely asked to deplane refused and it became necessary to contact Chicago Aviation Security Officers to help. Our employees followed established procedures for dealing with situations like this. While I deeply regret this situation arose, I also emphatically stand behind all of you, and I want to commend you for continuing to go above and beyond to ensure we fly right.

I do, however, believe there are lessons we can learn from this experience, and we are taking a close look at the circumstances surrounding this incident. Treating our customers and each other with respect and dignity is at the core of who we are, and we must always remember this no matter how challenging the situation.

Oscar

Summary of Flight 3411
  • On Sunday, April 9, after United Express Flight 3411 was fully boarded, United's gate agents were approached by crewmembers that were told they needed to board the flight.
  • We sought volunteers and then followed our involuntary denial of boarding process (including offering up to $1,000 in compensation) and when we approached one of these passengers to explain apologetically that he was being denied boarding, he raised his voice and refused to comply with crew member instructions.
  • He was approached a few more times after that in order to gain his compliance to come off the aircraft, and each time he refused and became more and more disruptive and belligerent.
  • Our agents were left with no choice but to call Chicago Aviation Security Officers to assist in removing the customer from the flight. He repeatedly declined to leave.
  • Chicago Aviation Security Officers were unable to gain his cooperation and physically removed him from the flight as he continued to resist - running back onto the aircraft in defiance of both our crew and security officials.
Email sent to all employees at 2:08PM on Tuesday, April 11.
Dear Team,

The truly horrific event that occurred on this flight has elicited many responses from all of us: outrage, anger, disappointment. I share all of those sentiments, and one above all: my deepest apologies for what happened. Like you, I continue to be disturbed by what happened on this flight and I deeply apologize to the customer forcibly removed and to all the customers aboard. No one should ever be mistreated this way.

I want you to know that we take full responsibility and we will work to make it right.

It’s never too late to do the right thing. I have committed to our customers and our employees that we are going to fix what’s broken so this never happens again. This will include a thorough review of crew movement, our policies for incentivizing volunteers in these situations, how we handle oversold situations and an examination of how we partner with airport authorities and local law enforcement. We’ll communicate the results of our review by April 30th.

I promise you we will do better.

Sincerely,

Oscar
Statement to customers - 27 April 2017
Each flight you take with us represents an important promise we make to you, our customer. It's not simply that we make sure you reach your destination safely and on time, but also that you will be treated with the highest level of service and the deepest sense of dignity and respect.

Earlier this month, we broke that trust when a passenger was forcibly removed from one of our planes. We can never say we are sorry enough for what occurred, but we also know meaningful actions will speak louder than words.

For the past several weeks, we have been urgently working to answer two questions: How did this happen, and how can we do our best to ensure this never happens again?

It happened because our corporate policies were placed ahead of our shared values. Our procedures got in the way of our employees doing what they know is right.

Fixing that problem starts now with changing how we fly, serve and respect our customers. This is a turning point for all of us here at United – and as CEO, it's my responsibility to make sure that we learn from this experience and redouble our efforts to put our customers at the center of everything we do.

That’s why we announced that we will no longer ask law enforcement to remove customers from a flight and customers will not be required to give up their seat once on board – except in matters of safety or security.

We also know that despite our best efforts, when things don’t go the way they should, we need to be there for you to make things right. There are several new ways we’re going to do just that.

We will increase incentives for voluntary rebooking up to $10,000 and will be eliminating the red tape on permanently lost bags with a new "no-questions-asked" $1,500 reimbursement policy. We will also be rolling out a new app for our employees that will enable them to provide on-the-spot goodwill gestures in the form of miles, travel credit and other amenities when your experience with us misses the mark. You can learn more about these commitments and many other changes at hub.united.com.

While these actions are important, I have found myself reflecting more broadly on the role we play and the responsibilities we have to you and the communities we serve.

I believe we must go further in redefining what United's corporate citizenship looks like in our society. If our chief good as a company is only getting you to and from your destination, that would show a lack of moral imagination on our part. You can and ought to expect more from us, and we intend to live up to those higher expectations in the way we embody social responsibility and civic leadership everywhere we operate. I hope you will see that pledge express itself in our actions going forward, of which these initial, though important, changes are merely a first step.

Our goal should be nothing less than to make you truly proud to say, "I fly United."

Ultimately, the measure of our success is your satisfaction and the past several weeks have moved us to go further than ever before in elevating your experience with us. I know our 87,000 employees have taken this message to heart, and they are as energized as ever to fulfill our promise to serve you better with each flight and earn the trust you’ve given us.

We are working harder than ever for the privilege to serve you and I know we will be stronger, better and the customer-focused airline you expect and deserve.

With Great Gratitude,

Oscar Munoz
CEO
United Airlines
Aftermath
Poll: Your Opinion of United Airlines Reference Material

UA's Customer Commitment says:
Occasionally we may not be able to provide you with a seat on a specific flight, even if you hold a ticket, have checked in, are present to board on time, and comply with other requirements. This is called an oversale, and occurs when restrictions apply to operating a particular flight safely (such as aircraft weight limits); when we have to substitute a smaller aircraft in place of a larger aircraft that was originally scheduled; or if more customers have checked in and are prepared to board than we have available seats.

If your flight is in an oversale situation, you will not be denied a seat until we first ask for volunteers willing to give up their confirmed seats. If there are not enough volunteers, we will deny boarding to passengers in accordance with our written policy on boarding priority. If you are involuntarily denied boarding and have complied with our check-in and other applicable rules, we will give you a written statement that describes your rights and explains how we determine boarding priority for an oversold flight. You will generally be entitled to compensation and transportation on an alternate flight.

We make complete rules for the payment of compensation, as well as our policy about boarding priorities, available at airports we serve. We will follow these rules to ensure you are treated fairly. Please be aware that you may be denied boarding without compensation if you do not check in on time or do not meet certain other requirements, or if we offer you alternative transportation that is planned to arrive at your destination or first stopover no later than one hour after the planned arrival time of your original flight.
CoC is here: https://www.united.com/web/en-US/con...-carriage.aspx
Print Wikipost

Man pulled off of overbooked flight UA3411 (ORD-SDF) 9 Apr 2017 {Settlement reached}

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2017, 8:29 pm
  #5266  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,403
Originally Posted by Kacee
No. "Must-fly" has clearly taken on mythic internal proportions among crew and employees, which far exceed any legal or contractual basis.
I think of "must fly" as nothing more than a priority category.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2017, 8:31 pm
  #5267  
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Programs: WN, AA, UA, DL
Posts: 1,313
Originally Posted by GadgetFreak
They don't need to be "excessive". They needed to up it like $800 more here. That's not excessive. If I am flying somewhere to consult, and I get $500-$1000 per hour and I'll miss the whole thing, say 4 hours at $750 per hour, it's $1350 for an IDB that's excessively low if I'm randomly picked. But you can't expect UA staff to deal with stuff like that. You have to make present offers to customers so they can make their own decisions to take a VDB.
I'll point to the math I did earlier. $1,600 X 4 is quite possibly beyond the breaking point where it's financially better to delay/cancel the SDF-XXX flight. Do you want that incentive?
minnyfly is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2017, 8:33 pm
  #5268  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 302
Originally Posted by hookthem
April 13, 2017
Involuntary denied boarding: What you
need to know
We are deeply sorry about what happened on United Express flight UA3411 and are committed to treating all of our customers with dignity and respect. We take full responsibility and will work to make it right by reviewing our policies to ensure this never happens again.


Sent by [email protected]
Why does that phrase always remind me of a funeral director?
cb1111 is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2017, 8:37 pm
  #5269  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,450
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
I think of "must fly" as nothing more than a priority category.
But (at least some) employees and crew think of it as an imperative, trumping all other considerations.
Kacee is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2017, 8:42 pm
  #5270  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: New England
Programs: Marriott Platinum, United Silver, American Platinum, National Exec platinum
Posts: 26
yes, but FAs and GAs just need to say there is a threat

GAs and FAs have almost unlimited power in which 99.9% will not stand up to in fear of being blacklisted by the airline as well as TSA. Well this finally came back to haunt them in a BIG way. If a GA or FA gets fed up that you dare question them all they have to do is lie and say you're a threat and the mall cops are called. Look at the initial report from United- it was ALL LIES- it claimed the Dr physically resisted the brown coats er...security...er police....and had to be forcefully removed and claimed that he FELL and in so doing he injured himself. No, the Dr didn't "fall" he was assaulted by the brown coats, oh I mean Chicago Police, oh I mean security, all because a blockheaded GA and/or FA on a power trip called the cops. This was bound to happen and it finally did in a big way.

Originally Posted by Kacee
Here's more from the hearing in Chicago:
Jeff Redding, deputy commissioner for security for the Aviation Department, said the department's protocol is for security officers not to board a plane if they deem the call for help a "customer service incident" and there is no "immediate threat."
Aviation Commissioner Apologizes for Dragging Passenger Off United Flight.
nefanboy is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2017, 8:43 pm
  #5271  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 40
"Must fly" is an internal designation, isn't it? That "Pilot's Wife" made it sound like the DOT mandated these employees must get somewhere ASAP. Please. They're not military orders.
ellenyc is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2017, 8:44 pm
  #5272  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 40
Originally Posted by nefanboy
GAs and FAs have almost unlimited power in which 99.9% will not stand up to in fear of being blacklisted by the airline as well as TSA. Well this finally came back to haunt them in a BIG way. If a GA or FA gets fed up that you dare question them all they have to do is lie and say you're a threat and the mall cops are called. Look at the initial report from United- it was ALL LIES- it claimed the Dr physically resisted the brown coats er...security...er police....and had to be forcefully removed and claimed that he FELL and in so doing he injured himself. No, the Dr didn't "fall" he was assaulted by the brown coats, oh I mean Chicago Police, oh I mean security, all because a blockheaded GA and/or FA on a power trip called the cops. This was bound to happen and it finally did in a big way.
Yes, it's given airlines carte blanche to turn routine customer service issues into "security threats."
ellenyc is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2017, 8:46 pm
  #5273  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NY Metro Area
Programs: AA 2MM Yay!, UA MM, Costco General Member
Posts: 49,038
Originally Posted by minnyfly
I'll point to the math I did earlier. $1,600 X 4 is quite possibly beyond the breaking point where it's financially better to delay/cancel the SDF-XXX flight. Do you want that incentive?
Your posts seem to consistently imply that UA should be protected (by the cops in this case) from market forces. If they did cancel they would also be canceling lots of connections ( I doubt there are many non-stops from Louisville). And upsetting a lot of people. If they had half a brain, questionable I acknowledge, they would operate the flight from Louisville even with a slight loss (not sure I buy that on a nearly full flight but whatever) if they had to. All their flights don't make money every day. IDB is very bad customer service except in very few cases ( equipment downgrades for instance) where it's unavoidable. This wasn't close to one of those cases.
GadgetFreak is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2017, 8:46 pm
  #5274  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Programs: AA PLT PRO, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plt. Premier
Posts: 587
Originally Posted by Kacee
But (at least some) employees and crew think of it as an imperative, trumping all other considerations.
Sorry the crew should be at level 10 on a scale of 1-10, 10 being least important. Cancel the next days flight because of lack of crew, 50 flights later after on time performance is reported, the airline suffers and does something.
dgparent is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2017, 8:46 pm
  #5275  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: Landry's President's Club, Marriott Silver, Awesomeness EXPLT
Posts: 20,409
Originally Posted by Kacee
Here's more from the hearing in Chicago:
Jeff Redding, deputy commissioner for security for the Aviation Department, said the department's protocol is for security officers not to board a plane if they deem the call for help a "customer service incident" and there is no "immediate threat."
Aviation Commissioner Apologizes for Dragging Passenger Off United Flight.
Also from the same article
"In response to heated and repeated questioning by 14th Ward Ald. Ed Burke, Evans acknowledged that Aviation security officers had been ordered to no longer wear uniforms emblazoned with the word "police."

Evans said the Aviation security officers were told in January to identify themselves as "security." " The investigation will probe why the officers captured on video were wearing black-and-white jackets with the word "police" on them, Evans said."
https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/2017...-united-flight

To use NCAA language there's a complete lack of institutional control within the ORD rent a cops and also the CPD. Both need to be under federal monitoring imho.
Cheers
Howie
stockmanjr is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2017, 8:50 pm
  #5276  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 302
Originally Posted by minnyfly
I'll point to the math I did earlier. $1,600 X 4 is quite possibly beyond the breaking point where it's financially better to delay/cancel the SDF-XXX flight. Do you want that incentive?
How do you figure that? What does it cost to operate an Embraer (we figure $8k per hour for a G4) so the only calculation is if the paid fares minus $6400 is more or less than the cost of operating the flight. Thereafter, you have to consider the costs of inconvenience to customers (not important to United) and the costs of getting the plane and crew (not the 4 passengers, but the flight crew operating the flight) to their next staging area.

The plane that went to Kentucky had an onward flight to somewhere and the crew had an onward flight as well. Even if the flight were cancelled, the equipment and crew had to get there somehow and a full flight, operated at break even (or at a loss) is still cheaper than moving an empty plane.

Airlines hate to cancel flights. It is really expensive.
cb1111 is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2017, 8:51 pm
  #5277  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,403
Originally Posted by aztimm
Exactly.

I'm always amused when I hear FA's say, "we're going illegal."

Illegal implies that a law is being broken. What law is broken if an FA works 5 minutes beyond what they are supposed to? Will someone be arrested?
My understanding is that it's a FAA regulation (not law). Violations can be punished by fines to the airline and/or the suspension/loss of a commercial pilot's license, etc. I don't know whether FAs are literally licensed for the position, but their certification could be suspended or revoked.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2017, 8:54 pm
  #5278  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Denver, CO, USA
Programs: Sometimes known as [ARG:6 UNDEFINED]
Posts: 26,691
Our values will guide everything we do.
That's the scary part.
DenverBrian is online now  
Old Apr 13, 2017, 8:56 pm
  #5279  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Programs: AA PLT, SPG Gold
Posts: 2,405
Originally Posted by minnyfly
I'll point to the math I did earlier. $1,600 X 4 is quite possibly beyond the breaking point where it's financially better to delay/cancel the SDF-XXX flight. Do you want that incentive?
How would it cost less than $6400 to rebook 70 passengers? I'm lost. I'll dig for your post but that seems hard to believe.
no1cub17 is offline  
Old Apr 13, 2017, 8:56 pm
  #5280  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: ATL
Programs: Skypass, IHG
Posts: 161
Originally Posted by minnyfly
I'll point to the math I did earlier. $1,600 X 4 is quite possibly beyond the breaking point where it's financially better to delay/cancel the SDF-XXX flight. Do you want that incentive?
Is that legal to cancel a fully boarded flight for this reason?
t_cliff is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.