Community
Wiki Posts
Search

No nuts for me....due to NRSA allergy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2016, 11:09 am
  #136  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ewa Beach, Hawaii
Posts: 10,907
When was the last time anyone saw a peanut (which isn't even a nut, it's a legume) on a mainline United flight? I haven't in years. And I don't remember seeing peanuts on any UX flights for quite a while either.
Baze is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2016, 9:05 pm
  #137  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: MFR
Programs: UA 1K 1.9MM, Hilton Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 2,879
Originally Posted by Baze
When was the last time anyone saw a peanut (which isn't even a nut, it's a legume) on a mainline United flight? I haven't in years. And I don't remember seeing peanuts on any UX flights for quite a while either.
I have been wondering this since the OP 10 pages ago. Is he saying the FA is allerigic to regualr nuts and cashews? I've never heard of those being "airborne" like the peanut people claim. I also haven't seen a peanut on US flight in years, certainly not in J.

Last edited by WineCountryUA; Oct 22, 2016 at 9:37 pm Reason: snarky comment reoved
chavala is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2016, 4:12 am
  #138  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: UA 1K, Hilton ♦ , Hyatt Carbonado, Wyndham ♦, Marriott PE, "Stinking Bum" elsewhere.
Posts: 4,992
Originally Posted by chavala
I have been wondering this since the OP 10 pages ago. Is he saying the FA is allerigic to regualr nuts and cashews? I've never heard of those being "airborne" like the peanut people claim. I also haven't seen a peanut on US flight in years, certainly not in J.
OP implied that the FA was allergic to tree nuts.

However, there is no known aerosol threat from microscopic nut particles, so the FA really had no valid complaint. Two studies were done with micro-milled nut powder (i.e. nut flour) to determine if inadvertent inhalation (i.e. not snorted) of microscopic nut particles would induce an antagonistic reaction in allergic subjects and no risks were found. The only known aerosol threat is from cooked nut products where the nut oils volatilized and were inhaled to induce an allergic reaction

Last edited by zombietooth; Oct 23, 2016 at 1:04 pm
zombietooth is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2016, 5:40 am
  #139  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 72
Originally Posted by zombietooth
OP implied that the FA was allergic to tree nuts.

However, there is no known aerosol threat from microscopic nut particles, so the FA really had no valid complaint. Two studies were done with micro-milled nut powder (i.e. nut flour) to determine if inadvertent respiration of microscopic nut particles would induce an antagonistic reaction in allergic subjects and no risks were found. The only known aerosol threat is from cooked nut products where the nut oils volatilized and were breathed-in to induce an allergic reaction
Exactly right - this whole thread is insane - there is zero scientific basis for the FA's request - it's just one person imposing their supposed superior needs on another....
UA Ronin is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.