Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Consolidated TPE logistics / connections / lounges (lounge access issue Jan 2024)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Dec 30, 2023, 12:11 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: WineCountryUA
Archive thread: Consolidated TPE logistics / connections / lounges {Archive}


Jan 2024
Originally Posted by ftweb
I'm a 1K (hence *G) flying TPE-SFO in Polaris. The Singapore Airlines lounge in TPE terminal 2 displays the star alliance logo, but I was denied entrance as a UA *G flying UA. The agent told me that they have special permission from star alliance to deny United flyers and send us to the Plaza Premium lounge because of capacity problems. ....Thanks.
Originally Posted by kaboom36
I recently took UA872 from TPE to SFO departing 11:10am. I am a 1K and had a paid C Polaris seat. Upon checking at the UA TPE ticket counter, I was notified by the UA CheckIn agent 872 flight pax is to use "Plaza Premium Lounge" instead of Eva lounge for *G and UA Polaris business class ticketed passenger. I thought it was just another option or lounge we can use at TPE. Therefore, I still went to the Eva lounge (designated *G lounge) and tried to enter the lounge. I was denied entrance. The Eva lounge attendant said anyone with UA872 ticket regardless of *G status or business class can not use Eva lounge due to "space limitation". UA contracted with Plaza Premium Lounge for flight 872.

Then I got further clarification from lounge manager that this restriction is only for UA872 ticket passenger. And it's not restricted for another TPE to SFO flight UA852 which departed later during the day at 1:10pm.
Print Wikipost

Consolidated TPE logistics / connections / lounges (lounge access issue Jan 2024)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2024, 5:55 am
  #136  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Programs: DL, OZ, AC, AS, AA, BA, Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott, IHG
Posts: 19,899
Originally Posted by MEL-World
Instead of complaining about SQ or BR, how about pressuring UA to provide a lounge of their own at TPE. SQ also has two flights per day but can provide a small lounge. As an SQ PPS, I'd be mightily upset with my carrier if I found the SQ lounge overfull of UA pax when they have another lounge option. UA has just too many 'elite' pax, I'd suggest.
I don't think Kirby will spend the money when they only have two flights per day out of TPE.
lsquare is online now  
Old Jan 5, 2024, 6:27 am
  #137  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: AVP & PEK
Programs: UA 1K 1.8MM
Posts: 6,349
Originally Posted by MEL-World
...how about pressuring UA to provide a lounge of their own at TPE....
With UA trying to eliminate as many hot meals as it can on domestic flights, have FA's be seated & pax strapped in for as long as possible, food degradation happening across Polaris lounges; the addition of a UC at TPE doesn't seem a strong likelihood anytime soon!
SPN Lifer, lsquare and Kacee like this.
narvik is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2024, 6:49 am
  #138  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: SQ, QF, UA, CO, DL
Posts: 2,882
Originally Posted by econ
Maybe it was just because of the holidays, but I was in the right-side lounge (The Infinity?) several days ago in early morning prior to a BR J flight, and it was very crowded. Didn’t check out the left-hand side lounge.
Were you on 872 or 852?

Originally Posted by GourmetFlyer
I am guessing yes, probably, this might be unique to TPE. I have accessed over a dozen Star Alliance Partner lounges in both Asia and Europe in recent months and experienced no issues. In fact, I was at the SQ SilverKris Lounge in HKG twice last year in Oct/Nov with a UA departure with no issues.



I think the keyword is "participating". A UC membership theoretically grants you admissions to "participating" Star Alliance lounges (regardless of status). But of course, in your particular case, SQ does not need to participate so I doubt a UC membership will make a difference.
Star Alliance website says paid membership allows access to all Star operated business lounges worldwide except for SQ Krisflyer Lounge in SIN and AC Signature Suite or UA Polaris lounges. Lounge Access Policy - Star Alliance But I bet it would not matter, sounds like SQ and BR are making up new rules when they want.

Originally Posted by MEL-World
Instead of complaining about SQ or BR, how about pressuring UA to provide a lounge of their own at TPE. SQ also has two flights per day but can provide a small lounge. As an SQ PPS, I'd be mightily upset with my carrier if I found the SQ lounge overfull of UA pax when they have another lounge option. UA has just too many 'elite' pax, I'd suggest.
Well, how about BR and SQ following the rules of the alliance they are in? When Star was created a big part of it was to be consolidation of lounges which would save money and allow for better service and amenities in lounges operated by the home carrier. With no home carrier at CDG they opened a Star Alliance lounge which was brilliant.

Not that it matters, but SQ's TPE lounge dates from when they operated 4-5 flights a day. I am surprised they even kept it after closing other international lounges, it just reopened and they announced it will be their last lounge to be reopened. Pure speculation, maybe they had pushback from BR on closing their lounge and had to change their plans. BR and SQ are not the closest of partners.

And as for UA having lounge in TPE, please, no. UA had its own TPE lounge ages ago (when they also had two flights a day) and it had all the charm of a dungeon, no windows and hardly any space to walk between seats. Unlike UA's first lounge in NRT I don't think it came from PA but it has been so long I can't be sure.

I am not a lounge person but this is getting out of hand. Very strange since it's not like the BR lounges are all that good!
uanj is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2024, 8:05 am
  #139  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Programs: UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 5,451
Originally Posted by uanj
Were you on 872 or 852?
OP said they were on a BR J flight.
econ likes this.
dkc192 is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2024, 8:48 am
  #140  
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 346
Well, I have an upcoming flight late this month on 852. I'm curious if the capacity controls are specifically for 872 or if they are for both United flights. I've flown UA from TPE a number of times in recent years and never had issues with going into the EVA or Singapore (when still open) lounges so to hear they're both blocking UA passengers is a real bummer. The Singapore lounge was never that crowded when I used to go.
lsquare likes this.
Clemson is offline  
Old Jan 5, 2024, 9:58 am
  #141  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Programs: UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 5,451
All reports point to 852 pax having access to the BR lounge. Not sure about the SQ lounge though.
SPN Lifer and lsquare like this.
dkc192 is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2024, 8:37 am
  #142  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: TPA
Programs: UA GS; Marriott Titanium / LT Plat
Posts: 658
I'm looking at UA871 SFO-TPE then on to BR395 TPE-SGN, looks like I'll arrive and depart T2. There is 3+ hour layover... which I assume is plenty of time.

I've read this entire thread, and not one post about International to International connection... can someone describe the process? Will I have to clear Security? Customs?

Thank you!
jonisflying is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2024, 8:59 am
  #143  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,031
Originally Posted by jonisflying
I'm looking at UA871 SFO-TPE then on to BR395 TPE-SGN, looks like I'll arrive and depart T2. There is 3+ hour layover... which I assume is plenty of time.

I've read this entire thread, and not one post about International to International connection... can someone describe the process? Will I have to clear Security? Customs?

Thank you!
Security only, but isn't 871 the daytime flight (i.e. overnight connection to BR395)?
moondog is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2024, 9:10 am
  #144  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: TPA
Programs: UA GS; Marriott Titanium / LT Plat
Posts: 658
Originally Posted by moondog
Security only, but isn't 871 the daytime flight (i.e. overnight connection to BR395)?
Oh. I think you might be right, I cleared that search - that 3+ hours might have been the flight time. Not enough coffee on a lazy Sunday morning! LOL!

Trying to find the best routing from East Coast US to SGN and I've looked at too many flights this morning!

If I choose TPE, how long does security take? And same in the opposite direction (SGN to SFO)?

Thank you!
jonisflying is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2024, 9:15 am
  #145  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: SQ, QF, UA, CO, DL
Posts: 2,882
Originally Posted by jonisflying
Oh. I think you might be right, I cleared that search - that 3+ hours might have been the flight time. Not enough coffee on a lazy Sunday morning! LOL!

Trying to find the best routing from East Coast US to SGN and I've looked at too many flights this morning!

If I choose TPE, how long does security take? And same in the opposite direction (SGN to SFO)?

Thank you!
International transfer security clearance at TPE on a busy day maybe 15 minutes. Probably less. You'll have to get the connecting boarding pass at the adjacent transfer counter if you don't already have it. That could add a few minutes. This will apply for your return from SGN.

Passengers from flights originating from the US starting this year do not need to go through security clearance. On arrival at TPE they are attempting to syphon off connections from US arrivals and escort them directly to the departure level. I hear that is already in place but I have not done it myself.
SPN Lifer, Majuki and lsquare like this.

Last edited by uanj; Jan 28, 2024 at 9:21 am
uanj is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2024, 9:32 am
  #146  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: TPA
Programs: UA GS; Marriott Titanium / LT Plat
Posts: 658
Originally Posted by uanj
International transfer security clearance at TPE on a busy day maybe 15 minutes. Probably less. You'll have to get the connecting boarding pass at the adjacent transfer counter if you don't already have it. That could add a few minutes. This will apply for your return from SGN.

Passengers from flights originating from the US starting this year do not need to go through security clearance. On arrival at TPE they are attempting to syphon off connections from US arrivals and escort them directly to the departure level. I hear that is already in place but I have not done it myself.
Awesome! Thank you!
uanj likes this.
jonisflying is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2024, 10:03 am
  #147  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,031
Originally Posted by jonisflying

Trying to find the best routing from East Coast US to SGN and I've looked at too many flights this morning!
If you're itching to try a TPE transit, BR71 from JFK connects nicely with BR395, but my preference would be to connect in Korea or Hong Kong (both also have flights from JFK).
SPN Lifer likes this.
moondog is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2024, 10:11 am
  #148  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: TPA
Programs: UA GS; Marriott Titanium / LT Plat
Posts: 658
Originally Posted by moondog
If you're itching to try a TPE transit, BR71 from JFK connects nicely with BR395, but my preference would be to connect in Korea or Hong Kong (both also have flights from JFK).
Thank you! Looking at HKG as well for connecting. Trying to stay on UA metal for as much as possible and I’m based in Tampa (TPA), so even considering HND / NRT, but that is a 7 hour flight after the long US to Asia leg. The nice thing about the Tokyo option is I can do 788/9’s, which I find to be nice.
jonisflying is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2024, 10:11 am
  #149  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: SJC
Programs: AA, AS, Marriott
Posts: 6,060
Originally Posted by uanj
Passengers from flights originating from the US starting this year do not need to go through security clearance. On arrival at TPE they are attempting to syphon off connections from US arrivals and escort them directly to the departure level.
This is correct. They'll look for your onward boarding pass and dump you airside at the gate. One minor criticism is that the signage isn't set up for people going back to the departure level from the gate, so some passengers were confused when we arrived in the seating area at the lower level (if you're familiar with how the gates are configured at TPE T2).
Majuki is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2024, 12:51 pm
  #150  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Programs: United
Posts: 1,978
Originally Posted by Majuki
This is correct. They'll look for your onward boarding pass and dump you airside at the gate. One minor criticism is that the signage isn't set up for people going back to the departure level from the gate, so some passengers were confused when we arrived in the seating area at the lower level (if you're familiar with how the gates are configured at TPE T2).
I'm glad to hear this discussion about transiting TPE because I'm going to transiting from UA 853 from SFO, continuing on to SIN on BR 225. I have about 2 hours to make the connection. Quick question: In terms of having the onward boarding pass for the TPE-SIN flight, do I need to have a hard copy boarding pass or is a cell phone screenshot enough?

But I'm happy to hear we don't even need to go through security anymore. That's awesome. Should give me enough time to hit a lounge. I'm *G and I'll be on a paid biz class ticket. I've never been through TPE. Any idea which lounge I can go to/should go to??
PremEx2000 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.