Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

United 77x Future/Changed Routes w/ Polaris Seats

Register
Community
Wiki Posts
Today's Posts
Search
Old Feb 21, 2017, 2:36 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: cesco.g
Current 77W Routes:
SFO/HKG (UA 862/869) Started 25MAR17
EWR/TLV (UA 90/91) Started 5MAY17
SFO/NRT (UA 837/838) Started 14JUN17
SFO/TPE (UA 871/872) Started 1AUG17
SFO/FRA (UA 58/59) Started 5OCT17
EWR/NRT (UA 79/78) Started 28OCT17
SFO/AKL (UA 916/917) Resumes seasonal service 27OCT18 - 29MAR19 (non-seasonal 3x weekly service operated by 772)
SFO/LHR (UA 901/949) Started 23APR18, ends 26OCT18, resumes 30MAR19
SFO/TLV (UA 954/955) Started 23MAY18
EWR/BOM (UA 48/49) Started 27OCT18
EWR/HKG (UA 179/180) Started 30MAR19

Current Non-77W routes
772 Retrofit:
EWR/BRU (UA 999/998) Started 30MAR19
EWR/CDG (UA 57/56) Started 30MAR19
IAD/BRU (UA 950/951) Started 30MAR19
IAD/CDG (UA 915/914) Starts 29APR19
IAD/TLV (UA 72/73) Starts 22MAY19, 3x weekly
SFO/PEK (UA 888/889) Started 30MAR19
SFO/FRA (UA 926/927) Started 30MAR19
SFO/CDG (UA 990/984) Starts 29APR19
SFO/ICN (UA 805/806) Started 1APR19, 4x weekly
SFO/AKL (UA 916/917) Started off-season service 30MAR19, 3x weekly

Past routes:
EWR/FRA (UA 960/961) 24MAR18 - 31JUL18 (now operated by 78J)
SFO/EWR (various), currently operated by 752, 78J, 77G
Print Wikipost

United 77x Future/Changed Routes w/ Polaris Seats

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 28, 2016, 4:22 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: BART Platinum, AA Plat Pro
Posts: 1,158
Originally Posted by mahasamatman
Other aircraft are better suited for those relatively short routes.
SFO-HKG can be almost 14 hours flight time in the winter. It's currently serviced by a 744, which has similar range to the 77W. The other airlines flying the route (CX and SQ) also use 77Ws on it.

Of course, as an SFO-based flyer who typically flies in Y, I hope that SFO gets lots of A35Ks and virtually no B77Ws. Unfortunately I doubt that is realistic.
milypan is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2016, 4:28 pm
  #32  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Alexandria, Longboat Key
Programs: UA Gold Marriott Gold AA Gold Choice Gold Wyndham PLAT IHG PLAT Avis President's Club Amtrak Select
Posts: 2,263
Originally Posted by milypan
SFO-HKG can be almost 14 hours flight time in the winter. It's currently serviced by a 744, which has similar range to the 77W. The other airlines flying the route (CX and SQ) also use 77Ws on it.

Of course, as an SFO-based flyer who typically flies in Y, I hope that SFO gets lots of A35Ks and virtually no B77Ws. Unfortunately I doubt that is realistic.
Years from now, I suspect SFO-HKG will see the A35J as all 77Ws will eventually be EWR based.
Longboater is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2016, 4:31 pm
  #33  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: YTO
Programs: UA 1K, Aeroplan Victim, SPG Plat, Marriot Plat, HHonors Diamond NEXUS/GE/TSAPre
Posts: 59
Originally Posted by theasianguy
... I think ICN/PEK will remain 747s until the first A350s come.
ICN showing B789 by April of next year.
w0rldtravlr is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2016, 4:44 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: NYC (Primarily EWR)
Programs: UA 1K / *G, Marriott Bonvoy Gold; Avis PC
Posts: 9,005
Originally Posted by FrequentFlyKid
Off topic as well but because I am curious....what was your coach fare class and what the offer?
Offer was ~$1750 for K --> GF (my original K fare was deeply discounted as well - effective cost one-way was <$300). I didn't take it, but it probably is a pretty good price outright.
PsiFighter37 is online now  
Old Aug 28, 2016, 5:33 pm
  #35  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: UA*Lifetime GS, Hyatt* Lifetime Globalist
Posts: 12,324
Originally Posted by PsiFighter37
My (current) bird shows up as being a 3-class 763...
Thanks for correcting my error.
UA_Flyer is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2016, 6:05 pm
  #36  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: ORD
Programs: Marriott Titanium Elite, UA Silver, AA Gold
Posts: 494
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
3 will be sent to SFO rest to EWR.

Will fly domestic hub to hub routes prior to being put on intl routes

Will fly ULH routes out of EWR & SFO.

Rumored first intl routes I'm hearing are EWR-HKG & SFO-AKL.
They need that much more capacity on AKL?
SPLITTERZ is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2016, 6:17 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 183
Any chance they will test these on EWR-SFO/LAX ps routes in December before deploying them on the long haul routes?
LangerhansCellHistiocytosis is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2016, 3:42 am
  #38  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4
Originally Posted by CALMSP
MD of Planning stated yesterday that the introduction of the 773 in EWR would start 1H17. That was in response to a question, so no true info if it was SFO or EWR first.
I would have to agree on the locations that have Polaris Lounges as the logical choice for the 1st flights.
Cosmoc is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2016, 7:46 am
  #39  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC
Programs: Marriott Platinum Elite, National Executive, United Gold
Posts: 1,181
Originally Posted by PsiFighter37
Offer was ~$1750 for K --> GF (my original K fare was deeply discounted as well - effective cost one-way was <$300). I didn't take it, but it probably is a pretty good price outright.
I had the same offer last year on a S fare to GF on a 3 class 763 flight EWR-LHR.
764toHI is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2016, 8:11 am
  #40  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, AA, DL
Posts: 7,418
Originally Posted by PsiFighter37
Why? Given there are going to be the same number of J seats as there are GF + BF seats on the 772s, I would assume the probabilities of upgrades will likely be the same.
Well, more Y competing for those seats.

And to follow-on post, while current pmUA have 8GF, those seats are potentially available to BF upgraders, which opens up BF space for Y upgraders (of course, not always . . . )
drewguy is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2016, 8:17 am
  #41  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DAY
Programs: UA 1K 1MM; Marriott LT Titanium; Amex MR; Chase UR; Hertz PC; Global Entry
Posts: 10,159
Originally Posted by eric.chen3742
Any chance they will test these on EWR-SFO/LAX ps routes in December before deploying them on the long haul routes?
A chance, but nothing for certain. As mentioned up-thread, shorter hub-hub routes would allow more cycles to get everyone trained up.


Originally Posted by Cosmoc
I would have to agree on the locations that have Polaris Lounges as the logical choice for the 1st flights.
First Polaris lounge will be ORD, which will not see the 773 for quite some time.
goodeats21 is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2016, 8:21 am
  #42  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,450
Originally Posted by drewguy
And to follow-on post, while current pmUA have 8GF, those seats are potentially available to BF upgraders, which opens up BF space for Y upgraders (of course, not always . . . )
But that's not what typically happen. GF goes to non-revs. At least that's what I've been seeing on all my TPACs lately - e.g., 10/12 GF seats on a 744 go to nonrevs at the gate. It's pretty clear why UA is shutting down GF . . . they're not getting consistent marginal revenue from it.
Kacee is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2016, 9:37 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: SQ, QF, UA, CO, DL
Posts: 2,882
Originally Posted by Kacee
But that's not what typically happen. GF goes to non-revs. At least that's what I've been seeing on all my TPACs lately - e.g., 10/12 GF seats on a 744 go to nonrevs at the gate. It's pretty clear why UA is shutting down GF . . . they're not getting consistent marginal revenue from it.
But it is amazing how little they have down since the merger to monetize the cabin, apart from the recent move to turn it into additional J seats.

I could never understand why they would not allow upgrades on discount business fares with a co-pay. I have to fly the cheapest business class available which usually means not upgrade eligible. So to use my GPUs I book Y and upgrade to J....
uanj is offline  
Old Aug 29, 2016, 10:10 am
  #44  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,450
Originally Posted by uanj
But it is amazing how little they have down since the merger to monetize the cabin, apart from the recent move to turn it into additional J seats.

I could never understand why they would not allow upgrades on discount business fares with a co-pay. I have to fly the cheapest business class available which usually means not upgrade eligible. So to use my GPUs I book Y and upgrade to J....
Oh I completely agree. Not saying it couldn't be profitable, but the way UA has managed it, the seats are mostly going to non-revs these days.
Kacee is offline  
Old Aug 30, 2016, 5:27 pm
  #45  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Programs: 1 thousand
Posts: 2,112
Business class on flights to NZ is generally quite expensive, there's not a huge amount of competition, and Air NZ is well respected/has a decent business class. I think I can fully understand why UA would operate Polaris on SFO-AKL - although using the 772 around Christmas might not help their reputation in the short term (not that the 787 holds up that well in comparison to NZ either)?
televisor is offline  



Advanced Search
Reply Closed Thread Share
Forum Jump

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.