Last edit by: WineCountryUA
Routing Advice BKK / Southeast Asia to/from USA for UA flyers
#46
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
SQ came out with a new seat for the A350ULR, which I have not sat in. It is a dirivative of its current seat (Zodiac) which is a decent seat. UA's seat is standard (same as DL and AA use). The SQ soft product will be much, much better.
#47
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,395
Based on....? And please don't quote seat width, as it's much less likely to be an issue in PE than in Y.
I've flown the A350 a couple of times -- admittedly, in J, not Y or PE -- and I was extremely unimpressed. I'll take a 787 or a current-generation 777 any day, all else being equal.
In this case, all else isn't equal. OP: nobody has flown UA PE service yet; the best you'll be able to do is to get a comparison of the seats themselves. If you just meant Economy Plus, I'd recommend SQ in a heartbeat. Otherwise, it's really going to come down to what you prefer. If you're comfortable being waited on, SQ service is great. If you'd prefer to be left alone unless you need something (and, admittedly, sometimes even then), you might prefer UA service.
The routing through SIN is about 1300 miles longer, which is a big difference. The last couple of hours of the EWR-SIN flight are going to drag. However, it can be difficult to find a good connection back through HKG from BKK; there's actually an entire board thread on the best way to proceed.
You might also consider transiting Tokyo; it's a little bit longer than the HKG transit, but still shorter than the SIN transit, and you should be able to secure PE all the way.
I've flown the A350 a couple of times -- admittedly, in J, not Y or PE -- and I was extremely unimpressed. I'll take a 787 or a current-generation 777 any day, all else being equal.
In this case, all else isn't equal. OP: nobody has flown UA PE service yet; the best you'll be able to do is to get a comparison of the seats themselves. If you just meant Economy Plus, I'd recommend SQ in a heartbeat. Otherwise, it's really going to come down to what you prefer. If you're comfortable being waited on, SQ service is great. If you'd prefer to be left alone unless you need something (and, admittedly, sometimes even then), you might prefer UA service.
The routing through SIN is about 1300 miles longer, which is a big difference. The last couple of hours of the EWR-SIN flight are going to drag. However, it can be difficult to find a good connection back through HKG from BKK; there's actually an entire board thread on the best way to proceed.
You might also consider transiting Tokyo; it's a little bit longer than the HKG transit, but still shorter than the SIN transit, and you should be able to secure PE all the way.
#48
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, UA Gold, WN, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 14,410
#49
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 60,172
I did SIN-SFO in SQ PE A350 and was not impressed. A bit more space but nothing otherworldly. The price delta was only $90 though - totally worth it at that price. $300+ though I would pass (and in that case go for E+ on UA...and pack a snack).
#50
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, UA Gold, WN, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 14,410
Yeah.. as discussed in another thread, UA is hitting the low 1000s on TATL PE also. The price points are insane right now and I wonder how long they will last. The p.s. fare wars are still staggering along, so maybe it will be years.
#53
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,450
Have you looked at BR? That's a much better routing than SIN. And I would bet the service is better than UA. It's also a relatively easy *A upgrade to J.
You might also consider going outside alliance and flying CX which has the best flight options, with three daily from JFK and one from EWR, plus nearly hourly service HKG-BKK.
I do not like the timing of the UA flights, and it's very difficult to connect the return same day. As jsloan noted, the SIN routing is considerably longer.
You might also consider going outside alliance and flying CX which has the best flight options, with three daily from JFK and one from EWR, plus nearly hourly service HKG-BKK.
I do not like the timing of the UA flights, and it's very difficult to connect the return same day. As jsloan noted, the SIN routing is considerably longer.
#54
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bellingham/Gainesville
Programs: UA-G MM, Priority Club Platinum, Avis First, Hertz 5*, Red Lion
Posts: 2,808
Have you looked at BR? That's a much better routing than SIN. And I would bet the service is better than UA. It's also a relatively easy *A upgrade to J.
You might also consider going outside alliance and flying CX which has the best flight options, with three daily from JFK and one from EWR, plus nearly hourly service HKG-BKK.
I do not like the timing of the UA flights, and it's very difficult to connect the return same day. As jsloan noted, the SIN routing is considerably longer.
You might also consider going outside alliance and flying CX which has the best flight options, with three daily from JFK and one from EWR, plus nearly hourly service HKG-BKK.
I do not like the timing of the UA flights, and it's very difficult to connect the return same day. As jsloan noted, the SIN routing is considerably longer.
#56
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: AS 75K, DL Silver, UA Platinum, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Platinum + LT Gold
Posts: 10,501
If you do end up on SQ21, there are several single seat arrangement in the back of the (PE) cabin - those seats would be my pick in PE on the world's longest nonstop flight (currently). I flew SQ22 earlier this year.
#57
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
Based on....? And please don't quote seat width, as it's much less likely to be an issue in PE than in Y.
I've flown the A350 a couple of times -- admittedly, in J, not Y or PE -- and I was extremely unimpressed. I'll take a 787 or a current-generation 777 any day, all else being equal.
I've flown the A350 a couple of times -- admittedly, in J, not Y or PE -- and I was extremely unimpressed. I'll take a 787 or a current-generation 777 any day, all else being equal.
Have you looked at BR? That's a much better routing than SIN. And I would bet the service is better than UA. It's also a relatively easy *A upgrade to J.
You might also consider going outside alliance and flying CX which has the best flight options, with three daily from JFK and one from EWR, plus nearly hourly service HKG-BKK.
I do not like the timing of the UA flights, and it's very difficult to connect the return same day. As jsloan noted, the SIN routing is considerably longer.
You might also consider going outside alliance and flying CX which has the best flight options, with three daily from JFK and one from EWR, plus nearly hourly service HKG-BKK.
I do not like the timing of the UA flights, and it's very difficult to connect the return same day. As jsloan noted, the SIN routing is considerably longer.
#58
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: TPA
Programs: UA GS, 1MM
Posts: 97
If you're going through HKG you might want to reconsider connections with Hong Kong Airlines. I booked a R/T to BKK three weeks ago on the UA website (016 stock), arrived in BKK on Saturday night. I was stunned to look at the reservation on my phone today and saw that the BKK-HKG sector had simply disappeared. Gone. Same thing on the website version. The receipt (thank heaven) still showed the connection. No notification from United at all.
I called Global Services and was told "oh yeh, non Star Alliance partners sometimes refuse to accept the reservation" and "we don't have a lot of control over non-Star Alliance partners so they may not have accepted the fare class you booked" to which I replied that this was United's problem, not mine, as I booked it through the UA website and it's their choice to offer this ticket to the customer.
Bottom line, after a HUACA and about 30 minutes of touch and go, I got the connection reinstated, but this was scary and I thought worth reporting.
I called Global Services and was told "oh yeh, non Star Alliance partners sometimes refuse to accept the reservation" and "we don't have a lot of control over non-Star Alliance partners so they may not have accepted the fare class you booked" to which I replied that this was United's problem, not mine, as I booked it through the UA website and it's their choice to offer this ticket to the customer.
Bottom line, after a HUACA and about 30 minutes of touch and go, I got the connection reinstated, but this was scary and I thought worth reporting.
#59
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,450
#60
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,395
I called Global Services and was told "oh yeh, non Star Alliance partners sometimes refuse to accept the reservation" and "we don't have a lot of control over non-Star Alliance partners so they may not have accepted the fare class you booked" to which I replied that this was United's problem, not mine, as I booked it through the UA website and it's their choice to offer this ticket to the customer.
Once you have a ticket, UA is obligated to get you where you're ticketed to go or to offer you a full refund. They will normally choose the former option, but they will sometimes choose the latter -- for example, if an airline is cancelling all service to a destination or something.