UA initiates Account Security Update (Security Q&A authentication added 2016)
#481
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA 1K MM, Accor Plat, Htz PC, Natl ExEm, other random status
Posts: 2,875
#482
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: YVR SFO EOF
Programs: UA 1K, VX S
Posts: 4,864
It's a free and open standard. There's no license cost to use, implement, or maintain. UA chose not to do it.
#483
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Programs: UA 1K (MM), MR Plat Prem, Hertz Pres
Posts: 1,164
Or, perhaps more likely, didn't know about it or didn't pursue the option. Using it with 1password makes my life infinitely easier for many parts of the Internet, but, unfortunately, United followed the path of many weak financial authentication approaches and didn't go with 2 factors. Frankly, it's ridiculous. If consultants did this, demand the fees back. If internal staff, get more knowledgeable security staff.
#484
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: UA 1K/MM, Marriott Gold
Posts: 132
I just need to vent about the stupidity of these United "security" questions. For some reason my phone logged me out and then when asked what flavor ice cream I like I chose Peanut Butter Chocolate. Who knows what I chose 6 months ago?? This is the only website that I can think of that thinks this method of security questions is effective. Then it took me 3 tries to get a reset email as the first expired, the second was all wonky and then 3rd time's the charm. Ask me what street I grew up on not a question that is going to change depending on my mood or the time of year.
#485
Join Date: Aug 2013
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 47
Brian Krebs, an IT security reporter and expert, with a piece on this here:
http://krebsonsecurity.com/2016/08/u...r-on-security/
Critical, especially on keylogger defense, because form-grabbers are bundled as part of those malware kits too. But concedes the alternatives create other problems. Nevertheless, a bit more understanding than I would've thought.
http://krebsonsecurity.com/2016/08/u...r-on-security/
Critical, especially on keylogger defense, because form-grabbers are bundled as part of those malware kits too. But concedes the alternatives create other problems. Nevertheless, a bit more understanding than I would've thought.
#486
Join Date: May 2012
Location: ORF, RIC
Programs: UA LT 1K, 3 MM; Marriott Titanium; IHG Platinum
Posts: 6,119
I just need to vent about the stupidity of these United "security" questions. For some reason my phone logged me out and then when asked what flavor ice cream I like I chose Peanut Butter Chocolate. Who knows what I chose 6 months ago?? This is the only website that I can think of that thinks this method of security questions is effective. Then it took me 3 tries to get a reset email as the first expired, the second was all wonky and then 3rd time's the charm. Ask me what street I grew up on not a question that is going to change depending on my mood or the time of year.
Good job, United.

#490
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DEN
Programs: UA MM Plat; AA MM Gold; HHonors Diamond
Posts: 15,813
“At the scale that United faces, we felt this approach was really optimal to fix this problem for our customers,” Vaughn said. “We have to start with something that is universally available to our customers. We can’t sent a text message to you when you’re on an airplane or out of the country, we can’t rely on all of our customers to have a smart phone, and we didn’t feel it would be a great use of our customers’ time to send them in the mail 93 million secure ID tokens. We felt a powerful onus to do something, and the something we implemented we feel improves security greatly, especially for non-technical savvy customers.”
Arlan McMillan, United’s chief information security officer, said the basic system that the company has just rolled out is built to accommodate additional security features going forward. McMillan said United has discussed rolling out some type of app-based time-based one-time password (TOTP) systems (Google Authenticator is one popular TOTP example).
“It is our intent to provide additional capabilities to our customers, and to even bring in additional security controls if [customers] choose to,” McMillan said. “We set the minimum bar here, and we think that’s a higher bar than you’re going to find at most of our competitors. And we’re going to do more, but we had to get this far first.”
#492
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DAY
Programs: UA 1K 1MM; Marriott LT Plat Premier (+AMB); Amex MR; Chase UR; Hertz PC; Global Entry
Posts: 9,234
Interesting that I just saw some info from the Social Security Administration that they are temporarily rolling back the requirement to use OTP to access account. It was only sent via SMS.
Quote from an email:
I think I already mentioned up-thread, but when my credit union went to OTP, it caused big problems for me as they only had SMS option. With multiple phone numbers and SIM cards, it wasn't acceptable to me. After much escalation, I finally got them to activate the option to have the OTP sent via email.
Balance between convenience and security.
Quote from an email:
However, multifactor authentication inconvenienced or restricted access to some of our account holders. We’re listening to your concerns and are responding by temporarily rolling back this mandate
Balance between convenience and security.
#494
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Programs: UA 1K (MM), MR Plat Prem, Hertz Pres
Posts: 1,164
NIST has said that SMS isn't a secure method to deliver OTP. For anyone who carries a moderately current smart device, OTP software is readily available. This should be the primary method for people who carry such a device. Heck, United could even do it through the United app!
#495
Join Date: May 2010
Location: AVP & PEK
Programs: UA 1K 1.7MM, AVIS PC
Posts: 4,976