Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

Premium Transcon Service SFO-EWR/BOS, LAX-EWR flights - Questions and Experiences

Premium Transcon Service SFO-EWR/BOS, LAX-EWR flights - Questions and Experiences

    Hide Wikipost
Old Jul 6, 19, 1:29 pm   -   Wikipost
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been on FT for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: WineCountryUA
Wiki Link
Update 2017: United p.s. is now called Transcontinental Service. This service is available on flights between EWR<>LAX, EWR<>SFO, and BOS<>SFO.
Cross Country Comfort: Introducing United Airlines’ New Transcontinental Service

Originally Posted by United POLARIS FAQ
How does the switch to United Polaris affect United p.s.® Premium Service transcontinental flights?
On December 1, 2016, BusinessFirst service on p.s. transcontinental routes became United Business®, and now features our custom Saks Fifth Avenue pillow and duvet. Previous p.s. features did not change other than the new bedding.
The first PS flights to/from EWR started 25 Oct 2015
United offers transcontinental travelers the features and comfort of long-haul international flights. Customers enjoy modern aircraft interiors with all-new seats, inflight Wi-Fi, free personal on-demand entertainment at every seat, in-seat power and USB ports.

United also provides:
* Premier Access check-in, security screening, boarding and baggage handling;
* United Club access;
* up to 6 feet, 4 inches of sleeping space in a 180-degree flat-bed seat; and
* pre-departure beverages, hot towel service, multi-course meals and a pre-arrival snack.
E+ passengers -- hot meals and drinks included
Travelers in Economy Plus on our premium transcontinental flights now enjoy more than just extra legroom — they’ll also receive a complimentary hot entrée, fruit and dessert, as well as their choice of free alcoholic beverages, including our featured cocktail and more.
Aircraft 757-200
Original config 28 lieflat BF / 42 E+ / 72 E-
Everything You Want to Know About Where to Sit on a 757-200 (pmUA Domestic and p.s.)

Re-purposed TATL config 16 lieflat BF / 45 E+ / 108 E-
Consolidated "Seats on International 757"

other lie-flat aircraft will be used on the route, such as
Everything You Wanted to Know About Where to Sit on 777-200 HD (28BF,102E+,234E-)
Everything you want to know about where to sit on the 787-10

FAQs
Are all flights on these routes lie-flat, etc?
Yes -- all non-stop flights from SFO/LAX to/from EWR and SFO<>BOS are configured as such regardless of aircraft used. All scheduled aircraft have a lie-flat premium cabin.

Are these CPU-eligible flights?
No -- no CPU on these flights. It will take RPU/GPU/mileage+copays to upgrade. Generally, these are "hard" upgrades.

Are TODs / Cash upgrades offered?
Yes, $298 cash OW upgrades are regularly offered.

Archive: Premium Transcon Service SFO-EWR/BOS, LAX-EWR flights-Questions&Experiences {Archive}
Print Wikipost

Old Apr 21, 19, 8:13 am
  #496  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Programs: United GS; AA EXP; Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 169
Originally Posted by bioyuki View Post
Thanks for making me paranoid about my upcoming BOS-SFO flight. If UA does downgrade J->Y due to operation issues, what is the procedure? Is it by status, currently selected seat, or something else?
Likely by status and fare class. They may also solicit volunteers to downgrade in exchange for travel vouchers or miles at the gate.
bdw1120 is offline  
Old Apr 21, 19, 8:18 am
  #497  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: UA Plat MM, CM Plat, Amex Plat, Hertz CP, Hyatt Globalist, SPG Gold, Vons Club
Posts: 4,567
Originally Posted by j2simpso View Post
Absolutely not. Polaris Lounge access requires flying either UA in Polaris across an ocean (i.e. EWR > LHR) or departing from a *A airline in J/F going across the ocean (i.e. SFO>NRT on NH). However, if you are a UA Gold or above member you have access to several non-UA lounges at EWR, namely the LH and SK lounge at Terminal B. The former has an excellent selection of food but tends to be crowded. The latter has meh food (albeit slightly better than UC EWR IMHO) but has tons more space due to it not being crowded. You can access Terminal B either by taking the United shuttle bus to Terminal B or by walking to Terminal B landside and clearing security there. If you do the latter, skip the line and keep walking towards security on the right hand side. You'll eventually see a sign that say Business/First. Use that line (since you're a *Gold) and you'll be in the terminal within 30 minutes or so. Keep in mind, you'll need to add time to get back to Terminal C since there is no bus airside to bring you back there. In that case use the Premier Access and/or TSA pre line (supposing you have the latter), whichever is shorter. From my experience it takes no more than 10 minutes to clear security using either lane.

Safe Travels,

James
There is no bus service from terminal C to terminal B on the United shuttle unless you’re flying out from terminal B on another onward star carrier. I learned that first hand this week, and only attempted it based on the erroneous reports I was reading. Therefore, I’m stating this for the record from personal experience (As an aside, the food in the LH lounge while plentiful and a nice selection seem to be all dried out and not fresh when I entered around 5 PM last week)
Flying Machine is offline  
Old Apr 21, 19, 10:02 am
  #498  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,351
Originally Posted by Kacee View Post
Premium t-con is actually quite pricey these days if you can't get a P fare - typically well over $2k. And if you're buying within a week of departure, it's going to be over $3k. There are plenty of intercontinental routes that are less than that on dollars per hour of flight basis.

The answer to "why doesn't premium t-con get Polaris lounge is access" is "because UA has not granted it." No need for explanations beyond that.
Or that there's a reason UA hasn't called Premium Transcon "Polaris". I'll still argue the average Polaris fare is far higher than the average Premium Transcon fare, in spite of a little overlap al low end of Polaris fares and high end of Premium Transcon. Week of flying purchase of Polaris-route fare can be pretty high ($10k +). People still want to now why "Premium" doesn't get premium lounge - "Just because" sometimes doesn't satisfy.

You're right on per-hour costs.

Big part of the decision is probably the sheer volume of people that would be entitled to use lounge at both ends SFO/LAX/EWR if Tramscon let in. LAX Polaris lounge definitely not designed for it and would be miserably crowded all the time. Add SFO and LAX-bound passengers toe EWR Polaris lounge and it would be chaos.

Last edited by IAH-OIL-TRASH; Apr 21, 19 at 10:09 am
IAH-OIL-TRASH is offline  
Old Apr 21, 19, 12:04 pm
  #499  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,490
if you’re traveling between LA/SF & Manhattan in paid J, book AA over UA because AA provides an identical onboard product and far superior airport experience in Flagship lounges. UA must not care about losing these customers, figuring their EWR location & locked-in frequent fliers provide the airline with its “natural share” of business. they may be right.

assuming fares are identical.

or, otherwise book DL for better on-board privacy and 200% - 400% earning into VS.

or, JetBlue.
Colin is offline  
Old Apr 21, 19, 12:11 pm
  #500  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
Originally Posted by IAH-OIL-TRASH View Post
Or that there's a reason UA hasn't called Premium Transcon "Polaris". I'll still argue the average Polaris fare is far higher than the average Premium Transcon fare, in spite of a little overlap al low end of Polaris fares and high end of Premium Transcon. Week of flying purchase of Polaris-route fare can be pretty high ($10k +). People still want to now why "Premium" doesn't get premium lounge - "Just because" sometimes doesn't satisfy.

You're right on per-hour costs.

Big part of the decision is probably the sheer volume of people that would be entitled to use lounge at both ends SFO/LAX/EWR if Tramscon let in. LAX Polaris lounge definitely not designed for it and would be miserably crowded all the time. Add SFO and LAX-bound passengers toe EWR Polaris lounge and it would be chaos.
I can understand that concern and would argue that UA should then limit Polaris lounge access to the people who really need it (i.e. LA/SF travellers on redeyes arriving at 6 AM). The whole appeal of the p.s. service is that at night you'll get a decent rest (avoiding hotel cost) arriving in New York first thing next day to be productive. Having a shower and breakfast is a must to complete this experience and is something the UCs no longer provide.

Anyone who thought showers should get pulled from the UC hubs should be fired!
​​​​​

-James
FlyerTalker70 is offline  
Old Apr 21, 19, 1:19 pm
  #501  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,351
Originally Posted by j2simpso View Post
I can understand that concern and would argue that UA should then limit Polaris lounge access to the people who really need it (i.e. LA/SF travellers on redeyes arriving at 6 AM). The whole appeal of the p.s. service is that at night you'll get a decent rest (avoiding hotel cost) arriving in New York first thing next day to be productive. Having a shower and breakfast is a must to complete this experience and is something the UCs no longer provide.

Anyone who thought showers should get pulled from the UC hubs should be fired!
​​​​​

-James
That argument can extend to passengers arriving on redeyes into EWR from Hawaii or Las Vegas, some who also intend to go to work. “Need” doesn’t go into equation. Lest we forget, there’s probably more people in coach that might be going into work after a red eye, too. Some feel they need a shower and breakfast, too. Breakfast is a red herring. I seem to recall plenty of breakfast options in the concourse. As for need of shower, the percentage of passengers who actually availed themselves of CO’s showers was small (and I don’t believe UA actually had any pre-merger at JFK ( I could be wrong). As a frequent IAH-LHR traveler, I (and my co-workers) rarely visited showers before going straight into partner/government meetings.

Last edited by IAH-OIL-TRASH; Apr 21, 19 at 1:28 pm
IAH-OIL-TRASH is offline  
Old Apr 21, 19, 3:51 pm
  #502  
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 3,359
Originally Posted by IAH-OIL-TRASH View Post
That argument can extend to passengers arriving on redeyes into EWR from Hawaii or Las Vegas, some who also intend to go to work. “Need” doesn’t go into equation. Lest we forget, there’s probably more people in coach that might be going into work after a red eye, too. Some feel they need a shower and breakfast, too.


The point I'm making is that for these few sets of flights that arrive so early into EWR why not open up the Polaris Lounge for them. No one is going to be using it, since European flights land later and Asian flights tend to land in the afternoon IIRC. IIRC the Polaris lounge would probably be closed that early in the morning so having these people use it would be a nice gesture on the part of UA.

Originally Posted by IAH-OIL-TRASH View Post
Breakfast is a red herring. I seem to recall plenty of breakfast options in the concourse.
Is it? IIRC the number of food options available at 5 or 6 AM at EWR is very limited and that's being generous. It's one thing if your flight landed at 7 or 8 AM but that early and you're in a weird twilight at the airport where it's too early for anything to be open.

Originally Posted by IAH-OIL-TRASH View Post
As for need of shower, the percentage of passengers who actually availed themselves of CO’s showers was small (and I don’t believe UA actually had any pre-merger at JFK ( I could be wrong). As a frequent IAH-LHR traveler, I (and my co-workers) rarely visited showers before going straight into partner/government meetings.
I understand that showers in lounges is a totally polarizing thing. Some people don't understand why they're there and find them disgusting and others like myself find them essential to battling to jet lag (in fact I believe it is the only known way to conquer it). All I'm saying is that for the half of the J travellers who find it gross being not having a shower in over a day why not make this option open for them?

-James
FlyerTalker70 is offline  
Old Apr 21, 19, 4:56 pm
  #503  
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: AS MVPG, Hertz PC, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Platinum, Delta/United Gold
Posts: 3,219
Originally Posted by j2simpso View Post
The point I'm making is that for these few sets of flights that arrive so early into EWR why not open up the Polaris Lounge for them. No one is going to be using it, since European flights land later and Asian flights tend to land in the afternoon IIRC. IIRC the Polaris lounge would probably be closed that early in the morning so having these people use it would be a nice gesture on the part of UA.

All I'm saying is that for the half of the J travellers who find it gross being not having a shower in over a day why not make this option open for them?

-James
It's a sub five hour flight. Not sure how you have reached the conclusion of not having a shower in over a day.

Opening up PL access to certain domestic travelers (J, TPS, red-eye flights only) is a slippery slope. Also, there are a good number of morning bank long haul flights departing EWR. Arriving UA pax would only have access to PL if they have onward travel.
Repooc17 is offline  
Old Apr 21, 19, 7:02 pm
  #504  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,490
AA manages that slope just fine
Colin is offline  
Old Apr 21, 19, 7:23 pm
  #505  
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: AS MVPG, Hertz PC, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Platinum, Delta/United Gold
Posts: 3,219
Originally Posted by Colin View Post
AA manages that slope just fine
The OP had proposed opening up PL access to red-eye flights only. Is AA doing that? No. The slope I had referred to: assigning access only to certain flights on a particular route.
Repooc17 is offline  
Old Apr 22, 19, 8:12 am
  #506  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: BDL/BOS
Programs: UA/*A Gold, Global Entry, Marriott Plat, Hilton+IHG Gold, Hertz PC, DL
Posts: 1,659
looks like LAX-BOS will only be 2x daily this summer, down from 3x last year.
riphamilton is offline  
Old Apr 22, 19, 9:15 am
  #507  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,490
Originally Posted by Repooc17 View Post
The OP had proposed opening up PL access to red-eye flights only. Is AA doing that? No. The slope I had referred to: assigning access only to certain flights on a particular route.
yes, of course. my mistake.
Colin is offline  
Old Apr 23, 19, 10:09 am
  #508  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: ORD, HKG
Programs: UA*G, AA PLT, HHonors Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 9,733
Originally Posted by IAH-OIL-TRASH View Post
Big part of the decision is probably the sheer volume of people that would be entitled to use lounge at both ends SFO/LAX/EWR if Tramscon let in. LAX Polaris lounge definitely not designed for it and would be miserably crowded all the time. Add SFO and LAX-bound passengers toe EWR Polaris lounge and it would be chaos.
​​​​​​
Originally Posted by Repooc17 View Post
The OP had proposed opening up PL access to red-eye flights only. Is AA doing that? No. The slope I had referred to: assigning access only to certain flights on a particular route.
AA F and J pax on transcon JFK-LAX/SFO can use AA flagship lounge at JFK and LAX, and F pax can use flagship first dining at JFK and LAX as well.
silverforumsurf likes this.

Last edited by ORDnHKG; Apr 23, 19 at 10:17 am
ORDnHKG is offline  
Old Apr 23, 19, 8:09 pm
  #509  
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: AS MVPG, Hertz PC, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Platinum, Delta/United Gold
Posts: 3,219
Originally Posted by ORDnHKG View Post

AA F and J pax on transcon JFK-LAX/SFO can use AA flagship lounge at JFK and LAX, and F pax can use flagship first dining at JFK and LAX as well.
​​​​​​​Well aware the access policy for AA. This is different. The other poster had proposed opening up PL access for red-eye flights only. If that had been the case, how would eligible pax on the same route traveling during the day feel?

​​​
Repooc17 is offline  
Old Jun 4, 19, 8:59 am
  #510  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Madison NJ; Watopia
Posts: 3,161
2418 today switched from 781 to 772

Status: Your flight (UA 2418) on Jun. 4 has been delayed because of a plane change caused by schedule disruptions in Los Angeles. Your new plane is expected to arrive from Houston at 08:21 AM. We're sorry for this inconvenience. Your estimated departure time is 09:25 AM, arriving in Newark at 05:38 PM.
767-322ETOPS is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search Engine: