SFO 1R Departure on 77W
SFO-EWR on UA1657, operated with a 77W, we took off from 1R. I'd heard reports of heavies occasionally departing from the 1s but this was a first for me in about 30 years of flying ex-SFO. Wheels up just as we crossed the 28s.
|
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 34179846)
SFO-EWR on UA1657, operated with a 77W, we took off from 1R. I'd heard reports of heavies occasionally departing from the 1s but this was a first for me in about 30 years of flying ex-SFO. Wheels up just as we crossed the 28s.
|
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 34179846)
SFO-EWR on UA1657, operated with a 77W, we took off from 1R. I'd heard reports of heavies occasionally departing from the 1s but this was a first for me in about 30 years of flying ex-SFO. Wheels up just as we crossed the 28s.
|
Originally Posted by Repooc17
(Post 34180494)
I had thought 1L/1R are usually the runways being used for all domestic departures, including transcon flights. Always get a window seat on the left side of the plane for an opportunity to see all of SF before the turn to east.
|
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 34180702)
The normal pattern is landings on 28s, takeoffs on 1s, except the widebodies use 28 for takeoff because of runway length. When lined up for takeoff on the 1s, you'll often see the heavies lined up at 28.
|
I think the fuel weight makes a difference. Checking my flight diary, all the 789s running SFO-IAH I've been on used 1R and every heavy going across an ocean was the 28s.
In heavy crosswind days, I have seen lines of heavies sadly camped out at the end of the 10s waiting for a break in the wind since they need the longer runway (for long flights). |
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 34180702)
The normal pattern is landings on 28s, takeoffs on 1s, except the widebodies use 28 for takeoff because of runway length. When lined up for takeoff on the 1s, you'll often see the heavies lined up at 28.
All the domestic heavies I’ve taken to EWR/JFK/IAD/ORD/DEN/IAH are usually on 1s except when the wind conditions cause all departures to use the 28s. Hawaii and International though usually take off from the 28s, though I’ve seen a few instances where they will use 1R. |
Any news on the meals in E+ and alcoholic drinks that were a perquisite with Premium Transcontinental Service
|
Originally Posted by Flying Machine
(Post 34226559)
Any news on the meals in E+ and alcoholic drinks that were a perquisite with Premium Transcontinental Service
But there's hope - meals have improved on West Coast - Europe flights this month in Y and PP. |
Originally Posted by MatthewLAX
(Post 34227347)
Internally, there has been no news of meals being restored.
But there's hope - meals have improved on West Coast - Europe flights this month in Y and PP. |
Originally Posted by Flying Machine
(Post 34226559)
Any news on the meals in E+ and alcoholic drinks that were a perquisite with Premium Transcontinental Service
|
Originally Posted by CMK10
(Post 34237204)
Just flew EWR-LAX in E+. One drink service with Biscoff after takeoff, one drink service without any snacks before landing. I was able to get a free 1Kwich at least but it was still pretty paltry.
David |
Originally Posted by CMK10
(Post 34237204)
Just flew EWR-LAX in E+. One drink service with Biscoff after takeoff, one drink service without any snacks before landing. I was able to get a free 1Kwich at least but it was still pretty paltry.
|
Originally Posted by Flying Machine
(Post 34238041)
I’m a platinum, so for drink service was it complementary alcoholic beverages? Which was typically provided with as part of the premium Transcon service (which I stated earlier also included a meal and a kind bar)
|
Originally Posted by Flying Machine
(Post 34238041)
I’m a platinum, so for drink service was it complementary alcoholic beverages?
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:57 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.