Originally Posted by MrAndy1369
(Post 35415672)
I noticed on a couple of EWR-LAX flights, the 777-222 (presumably the "ghetto" domestic 777) were used. Wouldn't this route be completely Polaris, using the 77W/787's?
But yes, the recent schedule has LAX downgraded to mostly 757 and 777. One of the 777s is a Polaris, the rest HD. If you want to guarantee Polaris, there is a single 78X that remains. |
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 35415720)
There's no guarantee of a lie flat. UA has subbed 753s and 739s.
|
Originally Posted by cfischer
(Post 35416355)
UA guarantees it as much as anything can be guaranteed. Means they will pay you a compensation when they can't have a lie-flat aircraft on that route.
|
If true, then that might warrant a DOT complaint if I was sold something they clearly advertise but didn't fulfill
https://www.united.com/ual/en/us/fly...-services.html |
We’re flying on UA2097 9:40pm SFO-EWR in Mid November in J. Should we expect a full meal dinner or just a snack?
1. Flight shows snack, but UA.com shows a "hot meal on all flights 800 miles or greater" UA.com North American Dining 2. I flew this same flight back in August 2022 and it listed a snack but had a full dinner. Granted it was a 9:00pm departure then. |
Originally Posted by phkc070408
(Post 35417010)
We’re flying on UA2097 9:40pm SFO-EWR in Mid November in J. Should we expect a full meal dinner or just a snack?
1. Flight shows snack, but UA.com shows a "hot meal on all flights 800 miles or greater" UA.com North American Dining 2. I flew this same flight back in August 2022 and it listed a snack but had a full dinner. Granted it was a 9:00pm departure then. |
Good news bad news, my wife got upgraded on yesterday's SFO-EWR to PS and enjoyed the UC access even though she is no longer a member. However, the bad news was the flight was cancelled ("mechanical") and had to fly another carrier to get to NYC AM (AA into JFK). Of course money and soon to expire PPs refunded. FWIW, she purchased business on AA and said she preferred the AA hard product on this route to UA's PS. I can't comment as I have not flown AA into JFK for years now from SFO.
|
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 35416598)
Nope. Several recent reports of no comp for no lie flat.
|
Originally Posted by nomad420
(Post 35418020)
Good news bad news, my wife got upgraded on yesterday's SFO-EWR to PS and enjoyed the UC access even though she is no longer a member. However, the bad news was the flight was cancelled ("mechanical") and had to fly another carrier to get to NYC AM (AA into JFK). Of course money and soon to expire PPs refunded. FWIW, she purchased business on AA and said she preferred the AA hard product on this route to UA's PS. I can't comment as I have not flown AA into JFK for years now from SFO.
And she isn’t the only to have a preference for the AA A321T business seats versus UA Polaris. I also think the food as well as the lounge access (LAX/JFK sides) are better than UC access. Last but not least you can use showers with AA before/after since, AC (SFO), FL (LAX), and Greenwich (JFK) have showers. |
Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 35416598)
Nope. Several recent reports of no comp for no lie flat.
|
Originally Posted by Infinite1K
(Post 35418046)
Shame she wasn’t able to get booked on AA via UA and still get ORC. And she could have still credited her AA flight.
And she isn’t the only to have a preference for the AA A321T business seats versus UA Polaris. I also think the food as well as the lounge access (LAX/JFK sides) are better than UC access. Last but not least you can use showers with AA before/after since, AC (SFO), FL (LAX), and Greenwich (JFK) have showers. |
Originally Posted by Infinite1K
(Post 35418046)
Shame she wasn’t able to get booked on AA via UA and still get ORC. And she could have still credited her AA flight.
Originally Posted by nomad420
(Post 35418091)
UA was offering her less desirable flight time on their equipment of course. She booked the AA flilght on her own as she needed to get to NYC ASAP. AA's A321T looked nice on the images I have seen of it. Isn't that a 3 class flight with a F section as well?
|
Originally Posted by nomad420
(Post 35418091)
UA was offering her less desirable flight time on their equipment of course. She booked the AA flilght on her own as she needed to get to NYC ASAP. AA's A321T looked nice on the images I have seen of it. Isn't that a 3 class flight with a F section as well?
|
Is there any difference between economy and economy plus? The United website says
Enhanced serviceTravelers in Economy Plus on our premium transcontinental flights enjoy extra legroom and will receive free non-alcoholic drinks and snacks. But aren’t non-alcoholic drinks and some small snacks already free in economy? I remember pre-COVID there was a brief period of time that alcoholic drinks and hot meals were free for economy plus. |
Originally Posted by cesco.g
(Post 35418064)
Also, on a couple of LAX flights Premium Economy is offered for sale, which can be an issue in case of a change to a non-Polaris bird.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:07 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.