Originally Posted by Kacee
(Post 25371873)
UA marketing has come completely untethered from reality.
The "untethered from reality" part is all this hilarious talk about returning to a "flyer-friendly" state when nearly ever action this company has taken since 2011 has been explicitly, flatly flyer-unfriendly -- even flyer-contemptuous. Flyer-friendly? Why start now? |
Quoting from the article : "("we wanted to be: the world’s most flyer-friendly airline,” Krolick explained. “Everything we’re doing is all supporting that
idea.” )" Don't these guys feel any shame, any shame at all? It must take guts to say things like that with a straight face knowing it's all lies. This guy would look great in the GEICO Pinocchio commercial ( "I see nothing but untapped potential. YOU have potential.....and the nose grows ). It's really sad:mad: |
and to start this process of equaling Delta, we are going to start with our frequent flyer program. As of tomorrow, we are upping the miles needed for redemption for all flights into the 300k+ range in order to bring us more in line with theirs...
|
OP: The piece you link to is a combo of quotes from the Reuter's article interviewing the new CIO http://finance.yahoo.com/news/united...--finance.html And a rather odd puff peice from Skiff that just makes United look silly - which has been discussed in a prior thread.
These things could just have happened now, or it could be a rather sad effort to respond to Delta's recent ads on how its the "on-time machine" and more importantly targeting of UA corporate accounts. |
Originally Posted by Baze
(Post 25347447)
Hmmm, rock and hard place. Have plane late but everyones luggage makes it. Or plane on time but luggage complaints go through the roof.
Originally Posted by DENviaLAX
(Post 25347640)
I've never seen an aircraft scheduled like that [sched arrival after boarding time]. It only happens when there is a plane swap involved, which only happens to cut down on an already existing delay situation(MX, WX, etc), not create one for no reason.
|
I assume Delta has the advantage of having a bunch of very old worthless planes hanging around to sub when a plane breaks. However those old planes should need more maintenance, and break more often. UA 747 were always broken and I think its got better after they moved them all to SFO for a year?
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:34 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.