Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Sep 13, 2017, 9:44 pm
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: WineCountryUA
Widebody and narrowbody usage for the next month can be found on www.unitedcargo.com

Archive thread: UA widebodies on domestic routes {Archive}
Print Wikipost

UA widebodies on domestic routes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 2, 2023, 10:24 am
  #151  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: BOS<>NYC<>BKK
Programs: UA 4.3MM LT-GS; AA1MM; Amtrak SE; MAR LT TITAN; PC Plat; HIL DIA; HYA GLOB
Posts: 4,392
Originally Posted by uanj
Out of curiosity I did a quick check on Sep 15, the 3 ORD-DEN flights are all 772 HD, the high density versions without PE and 2-4-2 seating in first. These don't fly long haul international routes and I have been running into many of them on hub-to-hub flights.

FWIW I've heard UAs international WB fleet is fully deployed and there is not a great deal of slack. Not as tight as DL or AA, but tight enough that with Boeing's delayed deliveries not to expect much international growth in the next 18 months. UA has already added a ton of new international flights this last year. The Australia additions are especially impressive.
True; but it looks like there are fewer HDs on EWR-LAX/SFO, and more 772s and 773s. So the HDs are displaced to other domestic routes. China/HKG were among the longest 773 routes pre-COVID, and it can take two to three frames per route for daily service. European routes can operate with one to two.
wxguy is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2023, 4:04 pm
  #152  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hilton Contributor BadgeMarriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TOA
Programs: HH Diamond, Marriott LTPP/Platinum Premier, Hyatt Lame-ist, UA !K
Posts: 20,061
Originally Posted by wxguy
True; but it looks like there are fewer HDs on EWR-LAX/SFO, and more 772s and 773s. So the HDs are displaced to other domestic routes. China/HKG were among the longest 773 routes pre-COVID, and it can take two to three frames per route for daily service. European routes can operate with one to two.
Assuming no MX issues. Gotta have spares.

David
DELee is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2023, 4:23 pm
  #153  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,450
Business traffic (in the traditional sense) on the LAX/SFO-NYC transcons is still down quite a bit. More people are buying premium fares, which are lower than ever before. It doesn't drive nearly the yield premium it used to, certainly a far cry from the old days.
SPN Lifer likes this.
EWR764 is offline  
Old Sep 6, 2023, 6:39 am
  #154  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central Mass
Programs: Independent
Posts: 4,829
Originally Posted by EWR764
Business traffic (in the traditional sense) on the LAX/SFO-NYC transcons is still down quite a bit. More people are buying premium fares, which are lower than ever before. It doesn't drive nearly the yield premium it used to, certainly a far cry from the old days.
Really? Every time I have checked premium fares have been sky high. JetBlue's Mint service was good at keeping prices down - after they aligned with American it seems fares went up, and I don't think AA has brought back all the flights they used to have.
Cloudship is offline  
Old Sep 6, 2023, 6:52 am
  #155  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: ORF, RIC
Programs: UA LT 1K, 3 MM; Marriott Titanium; IHG Platinum
Posts: 6,958
Originally Posted by uanj
Out of curiosity I did a quick check on Sep 15, the 3 ORD-DEN flights are all 772 HD, the high density versions without PE and 2-4-2 seating in first. These don't fly long haul international routes and I have been running into many of them on hub-to-hub flights.

FWIW I've heard UAs international WB fleet is fully deployed and there is not a great deal of slack. Not as tight as DL or AA, but tight enough that with Boeing's delayed deliveries not to expect much international growth in the next 18 months. UA has already added a ton of new international flights this last year. The Australia additions are especially impressive.
The reduction to PEK, PVG and CTU is also impressive, compared to pre-COVID (66 weekly flights down to 4 flights; back to 9 flights in late October). This reduction provides a lot of widebodies for other routes.

Last edited by Kmxu; Sep 6, 2023 at 7:09 am
Kmxu is offline  
Old Sep 6, 2023, 9:50 am
  #156  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,450
Originally Posted by Cloudship
Really? Every time I have checked premium fares have been sky high. JetBlue's Mint service was good at keeping prices down - after they aligned with American it seems fares went up, and I don't think AA has brought back all the flights they used to have.
They are higher than the pandemic lows, sure, but it's been my experience that I can frequently get sub-$1000 o/w P fares as close as within a day or so of departure, and I go to the West Coast 2-3x a month. More often it's around the $1000-1400 price point, which I still find to be reasonable compared to the "old days." SFO more expensive than LAX, as a general rule, and yes, AA capacity is still down, especially on JFK-SFO.
EWR764 is offline  
Old Sep 6, 2023, 10:21 am
  #157  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, MR LTT, HH Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 32,038
Originally Posted by Cloudship
Really? Every time I have checked premium fares have been sky high. JetBlue's Mint service was good at keeping prices down - after they aligned with American it seems fares went up, and I don't think AA has brought back all the flights they used to have.
certainly not what I am seeing. TCON is quite reasonable right now, assuming you are buying in advance. Plenty good P fares out there
cfischer is offline  
Old Sep 6, 2023, 10:43 am
  #158  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Programs: United Global Services, Amtrak Select Executive
Posts: 4,098
Originally Posted by PsiFighter37
Out of curiosity, has anyone done the research to show the increase in widebodies run domestically over the winter vs. the summer season is? I did do a check anecdotally of a random day in December for both EWR-SFO and EWR-LAX, and at least as of now, they are still flying about half the flights with 752s, which is more than it has been the past couple years (when you'd see only 1 or 2 752s at most, and everything else on a widebody).
I was reserved on a Polaris-equipped 787 LAX->EWR in late December that just in the last week was switched to 752...
physioprof is offline  
Old Sep 6, 2023, 10:55 am
  #159  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, UA Gold, WN, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 14,410
Originally Posted by EWR764
They are higher than the pandemic lows, sure, but it's been my experience that I can frequently get sub-$1000 o/w P fares as close as within a day or so of departure, and I go to the West Coast 2-3x a month. More often it's around the $1000-1400 price point, which I still find to be reasonable compared to the "old days." SFO more expensive than LAX, as a general rule, and yes, AA capacity is still down, especially on JFK-SFO.
Did you miss the better part of last decade with Mint, where P fares were stably $599 or so?

I agree there was a period before that with higher fares, but premium transcon fares are extremely high now compared to 2015-20.
Repooc17 likes this.
findark is offline  
Old Sep 6, 2023, 11:09 am
  #160  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: AS 75K, DL Silver, UA Platinum, Hilton Gold, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Platinum + LT Gold
Posts: 10,501
Originally Posted by findark
Did you miss the better part of last decade with Mint, where P fares were stably $599 or so?

I agree there was a period before that with higher fares, but premium transcon fares are extremely high now compared to 2015-20.
I am old enough to remember $399 P fares on a regular basis, and I am not even old.
tstauck likes this.
Repooc17 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.