Is United First worth $xxx upgrade fee?

Old Jan 31, 2014, 6:31 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: EWR, PHL
Programs: UA1k 3MM, AA Plt, peasant on everybody else, elite something or other at a bunch of hotels.
Posts: 4,637
Originally Posted by Edgerfly
The service in UAGF sounds atrocious.
Not in my experiences, as I have always received excellent service in Int'l F. However, it's a terrible shame that the FA's have less and less to work with.
1kBill is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2014, 9:52 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: East Anglia UK
Programs: BA-S UA LH-Sen KLM/AF-Plat.
Posts: 1,627
Originally Posted by 1kBill
Not in my experiences, as I have always received excellent service in Int'l F. However, it's a terrible shame that the FA's have less and less to work with.
I agree. made my first GF flights, LHR-IAD last summer with my wife after years of lamely continuing with BA f. So much difference! Both ways we had friendly helpful crew - who chatted with you if you wanted, kept away if you preferred- nothing was too much trouble. The seats were better than BA, the food was equally as good. All in all I have more flights booked and they are still cheaper than BA. Were we lucky?
lloydah is offline  
Old Jan 31, 2014, 9:56 am
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver • DEN-APA
Programs: AF Platinum, EK Gold, AA EXP, UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 21,587
Originally Posted by lloydah
I agree. made my first GF flights, LHR-IAD last summer with my wife after years of lamely continuing with BA f. So much difference! Both ways we had friendly helpful crew - who chatted with you if you wanted, kept away if you preferred- nothing was too much trouble. The seats were better than BA, the food was equally as good. All in all I have more flights booked and they are still cheaper than BA. Were we lucky?
If your frame of reference is only BA First, I guess UA probably isn't too bad. Neither would ever be confused with Gulf, Asian or German-speaking airlines.
SFO777 is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2014, 2:27 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: East Anglia UK
Programs: BA-S UA LH-Sen KLM/AF-Plat.
Posts: 1,627
Originally Posted by SFO777
If your frame of reference is only BA First, I guess UA probably isn't too bad. Neither would ever be confused with Gulf, Asian or German-speaking airlines.
That's true but I was thinking of TATL direct from LHR, not so many choices. Have tried Swiss in F which was so much better but time constraints make direct flights the norm for me.
lloydah is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2014, 5:52 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Maui HI
Programs: 1k MM, Hyatt Diamond,Marriott Gold, IHG Sphire, SPG Gold, Hilton Diamond, Carson Gold
Posts: 329
For me First is about the seat. Meals... are secondary
1fan is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2014, 10:00 am
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Hawai'i Nei
Programs: Au: UA, Marriott, Hilton; GE
Posts: 7,125
Originally Posted by 1fan
For me First is about the seat. Meals... are secondary
+1. Hard to eat when I am fast asleep.
747FC is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2014, 4:10 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: SBA
Programs: UA MM etc
Posts: 62
Global First is marginally better than Business First: quieter lounge, no adjacent seat on plane--otherwise pretty similar.
brhacker is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2014, 5:02 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: near to SFO and LHR
Programs: BA Gold, B6 Mosiac, VS, AA, DL (and a legacy UA 2MM)
Posts: 2,274
Originally Posted by 1kBill
Not in my experiences, as I have always received excellent service in Int'l F.
Me too, generally speaking. The seat is VERY nice - really wonderful for sleeping! And global first gives you more personal space and privacy. I tend to like the food on UA over the last year in both C and F. We're not talking high cuisine, but I've had some very good meals recently. Note that I'm not a meat and potatoes person and usually have the fish.
StingWest is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2014, 9:56 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: London; Bangkok; Las Vegas
Programs: AA Exec Plat; UA MM Gold; Marriott Lifetime Titanium; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,745
Originally Posted by lloydah
That's true but I was thinking of TATL direct from LHR, not so many choices. Have tried Swiss in F which was so much better but time constraints make direct flights the norm for me.
BA and UA have much in common: they both rely on captive audiences that choose them for convenience, not the hard or soft products.
Always Flyin is offline  
Old Feb 1, 2014, 10:44 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Beautiful Bay Area
Programs: UA MM flyer, ex. 1k, Star All. gold, AA
Posts: 23
My wife and I had a very nice experience in UAGF. Flying from London to ORD, I was in first and wifey in Business. The FA in first noticed and immediately after the meal service, brought her up to the lone available first seat for the remainder of the flight. She was very sweet.
chuckiec is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2014, 3:39 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Programs: AADULtArer
Posts: 5,654
Originally Posted by StingWest
Me too, generally speaking. The seat is VERY nice - really wonderful for sleeping! And global first gives you more personal space and privacy. I tend to like the food on UA over the last year in both C and F. We're not talking high cuisine, but I've had some very good meals recently. Note that I'm not a meat and potatoes person and usually have the fish.
Never eat the fish, Shirley!
LaserSailor is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2014, 3:50 am
  #27  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ORD
Programs: AA EXP,2MM, DL Gold,Starwood PLT
Posts: 3,876
It's pretty simple. Anyone's F class (or J) beats the torture of Y on such a long flight. If you have the miles go in the front. Now where it becomes more subjective is just which carrier to use those miles on for the front of the plane if you have choices.
grahampros is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2014, 7:17 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: WAS
Programs: UA1K .455 MM, Hilton and Marriott Gold
Posts: 397
Been on GF twice and many times in C and found the seat, service, and privacy differences to be pretty substantial. Sure, the food is very similar to C, but is no worse than food on LH C or other C products. It all comes down to personal tastes on the meal....I like the sundaes, versus a piece of cake that you get on other C products!
BigBossman is offline  
Old Feb 2, 2014, 3:11 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Programs: UA 1K, SPG Platinum, Hyatt Diamond, Hilton Platinum, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 568
Is United First worth it?

In terms of miles it prices about the same as other *A biz class. Let that be your guide.
LeviFlight is offline  
Old Feb 12, 2014, 3:04 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Programs: UA Premier Gold, Starwood Gold, Plat AE, CO PP MC, Marriott Rewards Plat, Virgin Elevate Gold
Posts: 1,417
LAX-CUN on a 737-900 series

How is the flight?

Is it worth using miles to upgrade to BF?

I was thinking the equipment would be 767 at least, so disappointed to see the non-stop on a 737 series

Just wondering if I am up for disappointment on any aircraft amenities or services?

I have traveled on Pre-merger CO to Rio, London, etc. on 767s and always enjoyed the perks
caseminole is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.