Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

UA Orders Boeing 777-300ERs / 77Ws w/ 1-2-1 Polaris Business, 3-4-3 Economy

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Dec 9, 2016, 11:15 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: FlyHighInTheSky


https://www.united.com/web/en-US/content/travel/inflight/aircraft/777/300/default.aspx
Print Wikipost

UA Orders Boeing 777-300ERs / 77Ws w/ 1-2-1 Polaris Business, 3-4-3 Economy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2015, 2:53 pm
  #151  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: LAS ORD
Programs: AA Pro (mostly B6) OZ♦ (flying BR/UA), BA Silver Hyatt LT, Wynn Black, Cosmo Plat, Mlife Noir
Posts: 5,992
Originally Posted by Kacee
Which probably didn't really add that much, as the armrests on the 763 and 772 have to be the narrowest J armrests in the world.
Agreed, but at 2" per armrest on a 19-20" wide seat, still quite significant relative to the seat width.
gengar is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2015, 3:12 pm
  #152  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,450
Originally Posted by gengar
Agreed, but at 2" per armrest on a 19-20" wide seat, still quite significant relative to the seat width.
Yes you're right, 23" sounds a whole lot better than 19".
Kacee is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2015, 8:43 pm
  #153  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DCA
Programs: UA LT 1K, AA EXP, Bonvoy LT Titan, Avis PC, Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,658
I am hearing that these new birds will be 3-cabin with current pmUA type of seating. Same GF seat, and same UA business.

UA needs to retain F for the Asia market which is a cash cow out of SFO. My understanding is that United actually sells lots of F in the Asia market, not in the South America, and limited in the European.

Maybe they will just move the seats over from the 744's to the 77Ws?
cova is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2015, 8:52 pm
  #154  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: UA*Lifetime GS, Hyatt* Lifetime Globalist
Posts: 12,330
Originally Posted by cova
I am hearing that these new birds will be 3-cabin with current pmUA type of seating. Same GF seat, and same UA business.
Hope it is not going to be 2-4-2 configuration. Why not maintain the GF cabin and using the 787 2-2-2 improved PMCO BussinessFirst seats in the business cabin?
UA_Flyer is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2015, 9:37 pm
  #155  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,692
Originally Posted by UA_Flyer
Hope it is not going to be 2-4-2 configuration. Why not maintain the GF cabin and using the 787 2-2-2 improved PMCO BussinessFirst seats in the business cabin?
I wonder if that's possible without a bunch of IFE work to get the older PMCO LFBF IFE to work with the same onboard servers as the PMUA IPTE IFE.
mduell is online now  
Old Jan 25, 2015, 9:40 pm
  #156  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: UA*Lifetime GS, Hyatt* Lifetime Globalist
Posts: 12,330
Originally Posted by mduell
I wonder if that's possible without a bunch of IFE work to get the older PMCO LFBF IFE to work with the same onboard servers as the PMUA IPTE IFE.
Good point especially if UA is trying to cut capex by moving GF and J seats from retired 744 to 77W.
UA_Flyer is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2015, 10:17 pm
  #157  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,577
Originally Posted by cova

Maybe they will just move the seats over from the 744's to the 77Ws?
Good idea. I'm sure that all of those seats in the 744s are in tip top, just like new condition.

I know Jeff and company are cheap, but I don't think they are that cheap. At least I hope not.
halls120 is online now  
Old Jan 25, 2015, 10:36 pm
  #158  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by halls120
Good idea. I'm sure that all of those seats in the 744s are in tip top, just like new condition.

I know Jeff and company are cheap, but I don't think they are that cheap. At least I hope not.

But they have a lot of experience making a brand new plane look old. I wouldn't put this past them.
channa is offline  
Old Jan 25, 2015, 10:42 pm
  #159  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,692
Originally Posted by halls120
Good idea. I'm sure that all of those seats in the 744s are in tip top, just like new condition.

I know Jeff and company are cheap, but I don't think they are that cheap. At least I hope not.
Didn't PMCO do this with the 762/764? The BF seats seemed to be far older than the planes were.
mduell is online now  
Old Jan 25, 2015, 10:55 pm
  #160  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Alexandria, Longboat Key
Programs: UA Gold Marriott Gold AA Gold Choice Gold Wyndham PLAT IHG PLAT Avis President's Club Amtrak Select
Posts: 2,263
Originally Posted by cova
I am hearing that these new birds will be 3-cabin with current pmUA type of seating. Same GF seat, and same UA business.

UA needs to retain F for the Asia market which is a cash cow out of SFO. My understanding is that United actually sells lots of F in the Asia market, not in the South America, and limited in the European.

Maybe they will just move the seats over from the 744's to the 77Ws?
If this is true, this has the be dumbest thing I've heard in the aviation industry since US Airways tried to sell drinks in the rear. I understand the need for a F Class product on some routes from KSFO, but this management could care less about F class. 2-4-2 in J Class on aircraft being delivered in 2016/2017? Even British Airways is introducing a new J Class product with the 787-9s. This would be the lowest of the low for $misek and Co. This can't be true. They've already selected their new J Class seat, which is very likely the same seat as Qatar is installing on their Dreamliners, A380s, and A350s, which is, in my opinion, the best J Class seat out there right now. Wouldn't the seats be ready by the time these aircraft would be delivered. I know American was able to get their J Class seat on the 77W off the shelf as their own seat was not ready yet. (Which was dumb, their 77W J class seat is perfectly fine for 772 and future Dreamliners and A350s.)
Longboater is offline  
Old Jan 26, 2015, 12:28 am
  #161  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 261
Originally Posted by cova

Maybe they will just move the seats over from the 744's to the 77Ws?
They won't fit.
BB2220 is offline  
Old Jan 26, 2015, 1:04 am
  #162  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NYC
Programs: UA GS, AA Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 444
Originally Posted by mduell
Didn't PMCO do this with the 762/764? The BF seats seemed to be far older than the planes were.
I'm not sure where they came from, but I know that I booked away from the 762 because the J seat was a little too "retro"
RJNYC is offline  
Old Jan 26, 2015, 1:55 am
  #163  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,324
Originally Posted by cova
I am hearing that these new birds will be 3-cabin with current pmUA type of seating. Same GF seat, and same UA business.

UA needs to retain F for the Asia market which is a cash cow out of SFO. My understanding is that United actually sells lots of F in the Asia market, not in the South America, and limited in the European.

Maybe they will just move the seats over from the 744's to the 77Ws?
Thanks for the information, Cova. I'll be disappointed if they install IPTE (a world class product in 2007, not so much in 2016). With AA already having a new F suite product, it would be nice for UAL to spend $$ on their own new product. I've long been told UAL was considering right-sizing 3-class F capacity and keeping it on select widebody (all A350, select 772, the old 744s, and remove from 763) flights into Asia and Heathrow/Frankfurt, but I always assumed if they decided to go in that direction, that they'd spend the money on a newly developed modern F product. Perhaps their next gen F/J seating can't be ready in time for the 773s, given the long-lead times involved with airplane seats?

Last edited by goalie; Jan 26, 2015 at 8:27 pm Reason: Removed deleted quoted post and response
tuolumne is offline  
Old Jan 26, 2015, 5:19 am
  #164  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Syd
Programs: UA 1k 1MM, VA G
Posts: 886
I keep hearing 3 class but not which seats (old or new)
LordTentacle is offline  
Old Jan 26, 2015, 6:15 am
  #165  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,450
The GF seats from the 747 would be incompatible with any new 777 because of the shape of the 747 A-zone. However, the rumored 10 three-cabin A-market 777s being converted to a high-density configuration certainly could be a possible donor of GF seats for a new 77W.

Originally Posted by mduell
Didn't PMCO do this with the 762/764? The BF seats seemed to be far older than the planes were.
Keep in mind the sCO 767s were delivered new in 2000-2002, so while the BF seat was rather dated even then, 55" pitch recliners were still a reasonable product for an international business class at the time. The 767 BF seats were new hardware, however.

When CO decided to convert the domestic 752s to international in 2006-2007, they refurbed BusinessFirst seats salvaged from the DC-10s, which were essentially the same seats save for a few cosmetic differences.

Originally Posted by mduell
I wonder if that's possible without a bunch of IFE work to get the older PMCO LFBF IFE to work with the same onboard servers as the PMUA IPTE IFE.
The IFE is modular and the 744 suite is an earlier version of the Panasonic hardware installed on the sCO 767/777s and sUA 777s (and the same as on the sCO 752 and sUA 67I). Not much of a consideration, if at all.
EWR764 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.