Originally Posted by mahasamatman
(Post 23450574)
Why are people calling this a POS issue? In all cases, the POS is identical. It's only the billing address that determines the price. It's like walking into a store and getting different prices if you give them a U.S. credit card versus a Canadian card. This is discrimination not based on purchase location, but based on where you happen to live or have your credit card billed.
It's a plane ticket that is being purchased on the internet. Why should the ticket price be different if I purchased a domestic (within US) UA ticket while sitting in a hotel room in London if I supply them with my domestic US credit card from the price if I supplied them with my UK credit card? I would agree if the airline would charge fees for international currency exchange (but the credit card company would do that anyway), but a significantly more expensive price just because you supply a different billing address is just discrimination. |
Orbitz/Expedia/etc.
That is all. |
Originally Posted by pagotto
(Post 23450579)
So stupid question, but couldn't the OP just go to any US-based OTA (like Expedia or Orbitz) and ticket at the US price?
This is how airlines price fares, and different airlines handle it differently. UA enforces this by billing card location. SQ, LH, etc. for example, will route you to the site local to the point of departure, no matter what billing address you use, and so you can't see whether it is cheaper or more expensive to book from a different locality. Plus, will be billed in local currency only. You need to go to another OTA from that place to find out if there is a different fare based on a different location. And often, those prices are way more expensive. For example, on Orbitz, looking for an ex-India flight on TG or SQ (IIRC), I found the prices were way more than booking through their own webites based in the country I was leaving. For example, on TG, the India-Thailand fares I was looking at would price in full Y only through US sites - and definitely more than double what I ended up paying through the Thai website paying in INR. Just the way it works.
Originally Posted by mahasamatman
(Post 23450362)
The fact that it's the 21st century doesn't alter the basic tenets of capitalism and greed.
I've seen it go both ways. In my experience, sometimes it's cheaper to use a U.S.-based card, sometimes it's cheaper to use a Canadian card. For that reason, I always price everything twice.
Originally Posted by ksingh0311
(Post 23450435)
Fastair, it is a discrimination regardless, which should be condemned.
Originally Posted by ksingh0311
(Post 23450467)
You may call it revenue management or some such thing but I call it discrimination. Not sure why you feel the need to defend UA here.
Airlines do use it more, sure, however, as a private company, UA, other carriers, and other private companies have the right to price things as they wish, and to encourage purchases through lower prices how it wants to.There are other choices too. While we're at it, be careful what you wish for. If price discrimination - revenue management, whatever you want to call it - goes away, so does your cheap airline ticket. It doesn't just affect where you are buying from. Get a good N, L or S fare for a trip this year? Those are based on factors such as one-way or roundtrip, length of trip, minimum stay, specific days/flights you are flying, demand, etc. So unless you want to be paying full Y fares for every trip, you might want to think twice about suggesting that price discrimination should be condemned. |
Originally Posted by artvandalay
(Post 23450619)
Living in SIN, I'm surprised you are not aware of the fare differences to be had based upon location of purchase, whether you are in Singapore or Malaysia or Indonesia.
|
As another user has said, I'm quite surprised you haven't realized that Singpoare is going to get overcharged compared to it's cross borders/regional neighbors like Malaysia, Indonesia, and etc.
It's quite normal, unfortunately it happens |
Originally Posted by mahasamatman
(Post 23450695)
I guess you haven't been reading the thread. The location is not changing. All that's changing is the credit card being used.
Anyone ever by a premium ticket ex CMB? Like most tools, if used properly, one can gain advantages, wielded by another, it can give them the advantage. Again, can't you (OP) but thru an agency there, have them "launder" your funds? |
Originally Posted by mahasamatman
(Post 23450695)
I guess you haven't been reading the thread. The location is not changing. All that's changing is the credit card being used.
"In the end a US-based friend got the tickets issued using his credit card." He not only changed cards, he enlisted the assistance of a friend to secure the ticket. My point was that I am surprised that a UA 1K living in SIN hasn't had this happen before. And after re-reading his post, I still can't understand why he thinks this is discrimination by UA. Frustrating? okay. "Discrimination?'' Gimme a break. |
The question isn't whether or not this is "discrimination," since it quite clearly is.
The question is whether this particular form of discrimination is "fair" or not. |
Originally Posted by pmarrsouth
(Post 23450381)
For future reference when booking tickets your PAYMENT details should be input as follows:
Address line 1: your sing/EUR address line 1 Address line 2: your sing/EUR address line 2 City: your sing/EUR city Zip: any USA zip (I use 33316) State: Florida (corresponds to above zip) Country: USA Majority of processors will accept a country mismatch so long as the f holders full name, address line 1, city, CCV and expiry all match. Means it will be charged in USD btw
Originally Posted by docbert
(Post 23450624)
Orbitz/Expedia/etc.
That is all. |
Originally Posted by mahasamatman
(Post 23450574)
Why are people calling this a POS issue? In all cases, the POS is identical. It's only the billing address that determines the price. It's like walking into a store and getting different prices if you give them a U.S. credit card versus a Canadian card. This is discrimination not based on purchase location, but based on where you happen to live or have your credit card billed.
Originally Posted by mahasamatman
(Post 23450695)
I guess you haven't been reading the thread. The location is not changing. All that's changing is the credit card being used.
Changing the credit card to a different billing country is exactly changing the point of sale. |
Originally Posted by ksingh0311
(Post 23450467)
You may call it revenue management or some such thing but I call it discrimination. Not sure why you feel the need to defend UA here.
|
As someone pointed out, it's cheaper for Peruvians to fly than "foreigners" on their local airlines. In Africa, it's apparently also considerably-cheaper for locals and those "in the know" to buy fares directly from the airline than on-line.
And all over the world I've seen pretty wild variations in pricing for a given item, in various currencies. Basically up to twice in dollars what it would be in Yuan or whatever... far greater than any possible currency fluctuation would account for. As pointed out, its capitalism, finding a way to get the most from those who don't have other options that are more competitive. Another way of saying all that the traffic will bear. I suspect the differences used to be larger before the 'net took over, as comparisons were far more difficult. As for what the "discrimination" is based upon, the CC is the only tool they have available. Well not really, they could also base it on the IP address of the computer, but that can be spoofed. My guess is that they likely try to do both. If the lost revenue from people upset over higher prices (and not buying tickets) becomes great enough, it may offset the extra revenue from the pricing differential, and pricing might level out. But until that happens, this is little different from revenue management that sells the exact same seat and service on a given plane for wildly-different pricing. |
Originally Posted by Mike Jacoubowsky
(Post 23451046)
As pointed out, its capitalism, finding a way to get the most from those who don't have other options that are more competitive. |
Originally Posted by ani90
(Post 23451097)
There are also other factors other than simple capitalism. Laws are different in different countries and terms of sale are different. In particular taxation laws and levies for foreign exchange transactions can influence differential pricing of commodities in different countries.
But if they are purchased outside of the US by a non-Australian resident, then they do NOT include GST. If you go and price SYD-BNE on matrix.itasoftware.com with a point-of-sale of SYD then you'll see that it adds 10% for GST. But if you price the exact same flight with a point-of-sale of SFO then the price will be exactly the same (after currency conversion), but GST will NOT be added, giving an overall cheaper price. Odds are that's not the exact reason for the OP's difference, but given that Singapore does have GST it's possible. Even if it's not, it's an example of why fares can be different for reasons you've probably never thought of. |
What fare bucket did you get when pricing in US dollars vs. another currency? It could be that you got a W fare or something, but with the foreign credit card, you priced in at M.
If you want to talk about discrimination, we can go down memory lane and discuss how business travelers used to get bled dry on transcon flights. The Saturday stay, the two weeks in advance BS, there used to be a buttload of price fixing and gouging that we don't have much of anymore. Unless you count the concept of fare buckets in general, which is a direct form of price discrimination. 130 people sitting in the same seats in coach, and there are at least 20 different prices paid for the exact same seat. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:12 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.