SFO-MSP going RJ?
#62
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Texas
Programs: UA, AA, DL, BA, Marriott, Hilton, Accor, Hyatt
Posts: 1,290
This "strategy" has been going on for a while
It seems as though in the past few years, at least from IAH, UA has decided to not compete on routes between a UA hub (IAH) and the hub of another airline.
Examples: IAH-DFW used to be mainline, now only RJ so I fly AA on that route which still has mainline md-88 jets.
IAH-ATL only RJs, all the 737 gone. DL has a large number of mainline flights a day and the F fare could be as low as $550 RT, this one isn't even a close call.
IAH-MSP used to have a few mainline flights per day, now all RJs, DL still flies mainline jets.
Examples: IAH-DFW used to be mainline, now only RJ so I fly AA on that route which still has mainline md-88 jets.
IAH-ATL only RJs, all the 737 gone. DL has a large number of mainline flights a day and the F fare could be as low as $550 RT, this one isn't even a close call.
IAH-MSP used to have a few mainline flights per day, now all RJs, DL still flies mainline jets.
#63
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ORD-LAS
Programs: UA MM 1K, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium Elite
Posts: 4,419
My past is proof, when things go wrong, either cancelled, bag lost, UA blames the Express. I had UA give me Skywest phone number in the past, when they lost my bag... Really? UA just washes there hands and walks away when it's an Express "problem".
#64
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Colorado
Programs: United MM (formerly 1K), Marriott Lifetime Gold
Posts: 551
I know that Skywest flights are more likely to be canceled (i just fell victim to an ATC-related cancellation on Thursday), but isn't it highly route and plane dependent? I mean, these are new planes for one, so fewer of them should go MX, and operations will still decide whether this particular flight should drop when SFO or MSP has limits on traffic.
I'm not weighing in on whether this is a good decision, but MSP-SFO on a 175 is not the same as ORD-ATW on an ERJ-145.
I'm not weighing in on whether this is a good decision, but MSP-SFO on a 175 is not the same as ORD-ATW on an ERJ-145.
#65
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: LAS HNL
Programs: DL DM, 5.7 MM, UA 3.1 MM, MARRIOTT PLATINUM, AVIS FIRST, Amex Black Card
Posts: 4,479
Why does UA not make every domestic flt express? Less costs, no blame. UA did not screw this up - Express did. Lower costs.
UA had these Skywest planes designed to UA "standards" - correct? How or why did DL set their "standards" to a higher level, also on Skywest planes? No meal on a 4 hour flt in FC? That is a complete joke. I'll say it, is this Texas Think? Even Lorenzo provided meals on a 4 hour flt. Hell, I had meal service on 1-1/2 hour flts in the past. UA has turned into a complete joke.
Again, just let Express take over all domestic flts and everyone will be happy, except the customer. At least when I book on Frontier, Spirit or Allegiant I know what I am getting. Come on UA!
UA had these Skywest planes designed to UA "standards" - correct? How or why did DL set their "standards" to a higher level, also on Skywest planes? No meal on a 4 hour flt in FC? That is a complete joke. I'll say it, is this Texas Think? Even Lorenzo provided meals on a 4 hour flt. Hell, I had meal service on 1-1/2 hour flts in the past. UA has turned into a complete joke.
Again, just let Express take over all domestic flts and everyone will be happy, except the customer. At least when I book on Frontier, Spirit or Allegiant I know what I am getting. Come on UA!
#66
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: Free checked in bag on UA & DL. Free icecream at Marriott checkin.
Posts: 2,862
I think the game plan is as follows:
Year 2014: Start moving hub-hub travel to RJs too.
Year 2018: No more domestic mainline. All RJs flown by express carriers.
Year 2020: No more international mainline. Move this to * Alliance partners or even better SkyWest to operate the 737 fleet. Anything that does not fit a 737 will take a stopover.
Vision 2020: United successfully transforms from an airline with physical assets to a marketing entity. No more pesky employees and their Unions; hard assets are for losers
Year 2022: Chase takes over United as it helps to cultivate HVC by throwing them a bone.
#67
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Programs: DL Platinum, AA Lifetime Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Platinum, Radisson Premium
Posts: 6,638
Well, atleast as of now, it appears no meal is to be served in F on the 1589 flight. When the switchover happened from A319-> E175 meal went from "Lunch" to "None" and "Dinner" to "None."
Starvation-friendly.
Starvation-friendly.
#68
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,452
#69
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Francisco
Programs: UA 1K since 1998 & 3 Million Miler & ex-GS; DL Diamond 2015-2022; BAEC Silver; Bonvoy LT Titanium
Posts: 1,018
My monthly SFO-MSP is now going to DL. I will not tolerate a barbie jet on this route regardless of increased frequency, increased number of F seats, etc. I have had enough UA barbie jet delays and cancellations over the past few months.
#70
Join Date: Dec 2010
Programs: Whatever gets me there faster.
Posts: 746
In my experience the Barbie jets are likely to get cancelled because of weather at the drop of a hat. The last time I tried to fly a barbie jet home was DEN-EGE. It started snowing and the flight was cancelled. When I drove the rental car to EGE to pick up my own car parked at EGE, the AA 757s and DL 757s had just arrived.
In your case, it's highly probable that a new forecast came out that would have prevented departure for several hours, so to keep the schedule, the only logical choice was to cancel this EGE flight.
#71
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: PDX
Programs: DL DM, AS MVP 100K, Amtrak peon, Colbert Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 4,534
This is really sad. Since the merger, SFO-MSP has alternated between 319s and 737-700s. In-flight service from both sides of the house and in both cabins has been generally great (I can recall one curt FA ever on this route). I like SkyWest folks, too. But on a human level, it's a gut-punch to see this flying taken away from mainline.
Schedule-wise, yeah, it's nice of UA to join the party with more than one frequency. An intermediate third flight would be helpful, too. More than anything, the aforementioned reliability issues with UX make this service unproven. I wouldn't want to book it until some operational precedent is established.
Service-wise, especially on the longer westbound flight in the evening, the loss of dinner in F will be a real loss. After a full day in MSP, on a four-hour flight the snack box doesn't cut it. Pickings in Y will be especially slim. What else will be enhanced? No more IFE of any kind. No wi-fi (vs. the 319). Power ports in F only (vs. the 737). Yes, upgrades might become easier (though not a given), and the lack of middle seats is nice. Leave it to UA to take an aircraft as nice as the E-series and make it as much of a forgettable commodity as possible.
On the whole, this just smacks of the smallball-friendly approach we've come to expect from current management. Maybe LAX-MSP will at least be upgauged from the CR7s one day.
As I mentioned recently, Sun Country is looking better and better every day. (Full disclosure, a DL-alum family member just started working there and couldn't be happier.)
Schedule-wise, yeah, it's nice of UA to join the party with more than one frequency. An intermediate third flight would be helpful, too. More than anything, the aforementioned reliability issues with UX make this service unproven. I wouldn't want to book it until some operational precedent is established.
Service-wise, especially on the longer westbound flight in the evening, the loss of dinner in F will be a real loss. After a full day in MSP, on a four-hour flight the snack box doesn't cut it. Pickings in Y will be especially slim. What else will be enhanced? No more IFE of any kind. No wi-fi (vs. the 319). Power ports in F only (vs. the 737). Yes, upgrades might become easier (though not a given), and the lack of middle seats is nice. Leave it to UA to take an aircraft as nice as the E-series and make it as much of a forgettable commodity as possible.
On the whole, this just smacks of the smallball-friendly approach we've come to expect from current management. Maybe LAX-MSP will at least be upgauged from the CR7s one day.
As I mentioned recently, Sun Country is looking better and better every day. (Full disclosure, a DL-alum family member just started working there and couldn't be happier.)
#73
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,450
UA has been in the SFO-MSP market since at least 2010... perhaps you have it confused with the more recent add of LAX-MSP (CR7)?
#74
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: SFO
Programs: UA GS 1MM
Posts: 117
Non-scientific study comparing Delta and United’s competitive hub capacity. Certainly been my experience on SFO-MSP and SFO-ATL.
http://blog.wandr.me/2014/05/compare...y-connections/
http://blog.wandr.me/2014/05/compare...y-connections/
#75
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
They probably won customers over big time with E+ and RJ with F when everyone else had single cabin and no E+. Now others have surpassed them, and they're no longer competitive.
Same goes with the Business class product -- the airlines that went "flat" first ended up with slanters. UA rode the next wave and got the full horizontals. DL/US/AA rode the next wave with the full horizontal, everyone gets an aisle flats. UA is now uncompetitive as a result.
If you call dark planes, crappy meals, and spotty WiFi actually "trying."
Luvo entrees: http://luvoinc.com/partnerships/delta-air-lines/