Article: Why United's Jeff Smisek is the worst CEO in the Business
#76
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SFO
Programs: UA GS / MM
Posts: 208
#77
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SJC
Programs: UA 1K/*G, AA, IHG Ambassador, Marriott Gold
Posts: 395
this article has it dead right. It's so sad that Smisek has screwed it up so well that it's gonna take so much more $$$ to get it right again. The longer they wait, the worse it will be.
#78
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: UA Gold
Posts: 103
I certainly agree with the conclusion about the substantial overall decline in the UA product, and would welcome a change in leadership.
It did distract me a bit to read the author's statements about "flying cross-country on old planes with no power adapters, no personal video screens..."
Just about every single UA plane flying cross-country without power adapters and personal video screens is a pmUA aircraft ordered by pmUA leadership before Smisek took over (I am aware there are a few currently "dark" 737-900s that have since come online; also, there are some pmCO 757-300's in operation that only provide power in certain rows in Y).
As to "uncomfortable, cramped seating," I question whether UA is really that far behind the domestic competition.
As to flights without free meals in Y, again, how far behind is UA with regard to domestic competition, at least in terms of flights within the mainland U.S.?
As to the "camera fetish," I remember well seeing the same "movies" when Gordon Bethune and then Larry Kellner were at the helm.
Please don't get me wrong. I am not a Smisek apologist. UA needs new leadership that restores customer confidence and loyalty in a once proud airline (on both the pmUA and pmCO fronts). The points I made above wouldn't matter or be noticed by most casual readers of the published article, but as an aviation buff, it did provide an unnecessary detour from the author's conclusion, which I wholeheartedly support.
It did distract me a bit to read the author's statements about "flying cross-country on old planes with no power adapters, no personal video screens..."
Just about every single UA plane flying cross-country without power adapters and personal video screens is a pmUA aircraft ordered by pmUA leadership before Smisek took over (I am aware there are a few currently "dark" 737-900s that have since come online; also, there are some pmCO 757-300's in operation that only provide power in certain rows in Y).
As to "uncomfortable, cramped seating," I question whether UA is really that far behind the domestic competition.
As to flights without free meals in Y, again, how far behind is UA with regard to domestic competition, at least in terms of flights within the mainland U.S.?
As to the "camera fetish," I remember well seeing the same "movies" when Gordon Bethune and then Larry Kellner were at the helm.
Please don't get me wrong. I am not a Smisek apologist. UA needs new leadership that restores customer confidence and loyalty in a once proud airline (on both the pmUA and pmCO fronts). The points I made above wouldn't matter or be noticed by most casual readers of the published article, but as an aviation buff, it did provide an unnecessary detour from the author's conclusion, which I wholeheartedly support.
Last edited by COA777; May 4, 2014 at 6:53 pm
#79
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA 1K MM, Marriott Life Plat, various others of little note
Posts: 2,763
#80
Suspended
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 1,961
UA has lots of 757's flying cross-country, with no power nor personal video.
#81
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,450
And the vast majority of the "dark" 739s are sCO aircraft.
The nine across in Y on the 787 was a horrible decision from a customer comfort perspective. (AA made a similar decision going 10 across on the 777W, but stayed at only 9 across in the MCE section.)
I don't know about that, but I sure feel like throwing stuff at the screen when forced to watch smiley Jeff before every single flight.
#82
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,576
#83
Suspended
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 1,961
#84
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: UA Gold
Posts: 103
I edited to state "pmUA aircraft," as the 757's flying cross-country without power or personal video are also pmUA aircraft ordered by pmUA management. I should edit again to note that pmCO 757-300's are in operation that only provide power in certain rows in Y (they all provide personal video entertainment or seat-back video throughout the aircraft, as well as power in every seat in F).
Last edited by COA777; May 4, 2014 at 7:02 pm
#85
Suspended
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 1,961
Most of the 757-300's have no power, and overhead screens only. And these are all PMCO, right?
#86
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,167
I edited to state "pmUA aircraft," as the 757's flying cross-country without power or personal video are also pmUA aircraft ordered by pmUA management. I should edit again to note that pmCO 757-300's are in operation that only provide power in certain rows in Y (they all provide personal video entertainment or seat-back video).
Hey we agree here Can't remember, was UA the first to go 9 across in Y on the 787? I know NH was 8 originally but upped it to 9 for later deliveries.
#87
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: UA Gold
Posts: 103
Not quite. Current management determined to rip IFE out of much of the 319/320 fleet and leave them dark. Likewise with the Hawaii config 772s.
And the vast majority of the "dark" 739s are sCO aircraft.
UA (along with WN) is taking the lead in this country on installation of slimline seating.
The nine across in Y on the 787 was a horrible decision from a customer comfort perspective. (AA made a similar decision going 10 across on the 777W, but stayed at only 9 across in the MCE section.)
I don't know about that, but I sure feel like throwing stuff at the screen when forced to watch smiley Jeff before every single flight.
And the vast majority of the "dark" 739s are sCO aircraft.
UA (along with WN) is taking the lead in this country on installation of slimline seating.
The nine across in Y on the 787 was a horrible decision from a customer comfort perspective. (AA made a similar decision going 10 across on the 777W, but stayed at only 9 across in the MCE section.)
I don't know about that, but I sure feel like throwing stuff at the screen when forced to watch smiley Jeff before every single flight.
Thanks for pointing out the 319/320 decision. I left out the HI-configured 772's because the author was discussing flying cross-country.
Good point on slimline--clearly an impact on comfort even if not on space.
#88
Suspended
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 1,961
JAL is 8-across in the 787, but all of the seats have 31-inch pitch, so I'd say that's even worse than UA. Boeing should have written contracts requiring minimum seat configuration quality for access to their great new plane. As it is, it's going to acquire a reputation for leading a new wave of crowding. :-(
#89
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,576
JAL is 8-across in the 787, but all of the seats have 31-inch pitch, so I'd say that's even worse than UA. Boeing should have written contracts requiring minimum seat configuration quality for access to their great new plane. As it is, it's going to acquire a reputation for leading a new wave of crowding. :-(
#90
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: UA Gold
Posts: 103
Version 1 of the 753 provides power outlets in F, Rows 7-15, 20-21, and 16-19 in Y, and DirecTV throughout, while Version 2 provides power outlets in F, Rows 7-15, 20-21, and 16-19 in Y, and personal device entertainment throughout.
Is their information not correct?