Any UA871 experiences?
#3
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: DCA or IAD (originally DUB)
Programs: UA 1K 1.8MM, Hertz PC, Marriott Platinum/Lifetime Gold
Posts: 7,657
You've asked a remarkably vague question without providing any clue as to what information you are seeking: e.g. What class of service are you flying? Do you want information about meals? Seat(s)? How to deal with jet lag? Why do you think this flight would be different from other UA trans-Pacific offerings?
#8
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: SFO
Programs: UA-1K
Posts: 308
It is the same as other international flights.
Business class had the standard international amenity kit. Dinner was appetizer, salad, 4 choices for entree, none of which were vegetarian, cheese/ice cream service. About 90 min before landing, breakfast was served even though we landed in the evening local time. The snack basket was available during flight. I think there might have been soup served mid flight but I didn't partake.
Business class had the standard international amenity kit. Dinner was appetizer, salad, 4 choices for entree, none of which were vegetarian, cheese/ice cream service. About 90 min before landing, breakfast was served even though we landed in the evening local time. The snack basket was available during flight. I think there might have been soup served mid flight but I didn't partake.
#9
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 1
Worst international flight experience I've had. Let's start with no personal TV's for a 14 hour flight. You can download their app but their internet is so slow most people around me weren't able to download it. You can buy wifi but it is so slow you can't even watch movies on it. The leg room seems to be less then other international flights I've been on. The food was absolutely pathetic like it wasn't even edible. Never again will I use United for long flights
#10
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: YYZ most of the time
Programs: AC SE100K MM, Princess Elite
Posts: 3,921
Worst international flight experience I've had. Let's start with no personal TV's for a 14 hour flight. You can download their app but their internet is so slow most people around me weren't able to download it. You can buy wifi but it is so slow you can't even watch movies on it. The leg room seems to be less then other international flights I've been on. The food was absolutely pathetic like it wasn't even edible. Never again will I use United for long flights
#11
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,875
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,884
Worst international flight experience I've had. Let's start with no personal TV's for a 14 hour flight. You can download their app but their internet is so slow most people around me weren't able to download it. You can buy wifi but it is so slow you can't even watch movies on it. The leg room seems to be less then other international flights I've been on. The food was absolutely pathetic like it wasn't even edible. Never again will I use United for long flights
As for comfort, I would never argue that a UA 747 is top notch for this, in fact, I avoid the 747 in Y when possible. For E+, it has the least legroom, at only 34", but for regular economy, it's 31", which is pretty standard in the industry - it's the same amount of pitch as much of UAs other longhaul fleet (like the 777), and many other carriers (for example, most of LH's long-haul fleet, including their 747-400s and 747-800s, and even their brand new A350s, are also listed as 31" pitch in economy). For sure UA isn't the best airline food, but IME, its certainly more than edible, and by far is not the worst I've had in the air.
#13
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NYC/WAS
Programs: UA GS, AA EXP, DL '90s PM, now FK (Flying Kettle)
Posts: 541
According to The New York Times, the next generation of planes won't have personal displays, in order to save weight and since almost everyone has a device for local streaming:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/16/b...ts-movies.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/16/b...ts-movies.html
#14
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Earth
Programs: UA MM Platinum; HH Diamond; Marriott Gold; Starwood Gold; Hyatt Discoverist; Avis Preferred Plus
Posts: 1,527
If it's any consolation, those birds (747) are being retired in the next few months. Replacement 777-300ERs do have PTVs in economy.
I will take a reliable internet connection over PTVs any day of the week. I actually think this is a more forward-thinking strategy; as more people travel with their own devices and their own screens, the PTV becomes less relevant. Give people reliable power to charge their devices, a good internet connection, and entertainment (i.e. the personal device entertainment from onboard servers).
But, I understand that PTVs are still an industry standard, so it's not unreasonable to expect them on longhaul flights.
I will take a reliable internet connection over PTVs any day of the week. I actually think this is a more forward-thinking strategy; as more people travel with their own devices and their own screens, the PTV becomes less relevant. Give people reliable power to charge their devices, a good internet connection, and entertainment (i.e. the personal device entertainment from onboard servers).
But, I understand that PTVs are still an industry standard, so it's not unreasonable to expect them on longhaul flights.
#15
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,875
According to The New York Times, the next generation of planes won't have personal displays, in order to save weight and since almost everyone has a device for local streaming:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/16/b...ts-movies.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/16/b...ts-movies.html