Community
Wiki Posts
Search

non-rev trumps 1k?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2014, 8:32 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Columbia, SC
Programs: UAL 1KMM,Hilton Diamond
Posts: 758
Had a similar experience two days ago. I was on a GPU - I had cleared NRT-SFO but not on BKK_NRT.

There were 5 open seats in GF and 1 in BF. There were a number of open seats in Y. Ten minutes before boarding I checked the list and the same names appear on the standbye list as well as the upgrade lists.

I politely asked the GA if there would be people sitting in BF that would be moved to GF. She said no.

After we had boarded I checked the list and GF was now full. The woman one of the GAs was chatting with socially while ignoring passengers in line was in one of the seats. I saw here name on the her boarding pass.

The OLD United in the past would have worked some of the passengers from BF (C) into GF (F) in order to accommodate more of the paying passengers.
santarosaflyer is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 8:36 pm
  #32  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ewa Beach, Hawaii
Posts: 10,907
Originally Posted by santarosaflyer
Had a similar experience two days ago. I was on a GPU - I had cleared NRT-SFO but not on BKK_NRT.

There were 5 open seats in GF and 1 in BF. There were a number of open seats in Y. Ten minutes before boarding I checked the list and the same names appear on the standbye list as well as the upgrade lists.

I politely asked the GA if there would be people sitting in BF that would be moved to GF. She said no.

After we had boarded I checked the list and GF was now full. The woman one of the GAs was chatting with socially while ignoring passengers in line was in one of the seats. I saw here name on the her boarding pass.

The OLD United in the past would have worked some of the passengers from BF (C) into GF (F) in order to accommodate more of the paying passengers.
I don't think non-revs get those GF and BF seats for free, they pay a fee to sit anywhere other than Y. On international flights anyway. At least that is what I have seen reported before.
Baze is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 8:43 pm
  #33  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Michigan
Programs: AA EXP(4mm), DL Gold, UA Gold (1mm), HH Diamond, Bonvoy Amb(l/t Titanium). Former EA/PA elite
Posts: 993
Originally Posted by Baze
I don't think non-revs get those GF and BF seats for free, they pay a fee to sit anywhere other than Y. On international flights anyway. At least that is what I have seen reported before.
I think they pay the tax plus a bit more. Its minimal.
Seat 1F is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 9:16 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,933
It's really no-one's business how these non-rev's get those seats. In the case cited above the non-rev was standing-by for the flight and was also wait-listed for B/F and G/F. It doesn't work the way that some people wished that it did --- i.e. the g/a moves B/F to G/F and Y's to B/F and what's left goes to non-rev's. Non-rev's (employee's) work for an airline for somewhat lower wages than other industries and one of the benefits is passes. They pay a minimal amount plus taxes, and again, it is no-body else's business re the agreement between an airline and their employee's. If anyone wants to sit in G/F on an international flight put in about 25/30 years listening to people that can do their job better, or purchase a G/F ticket, otherwise let UA and their g/a's do the seat assignments. Years ago Delta had a policy (as some airlines still conform to), "Our employee's are all First Class employees, and if there is First Class available, they will fly First Class."

Seriously, this is about the millionth thread on this forum alone that infers that somehow a non-rev is getting special handling and they got ripped off for not getting upgraded when it was their turn.

I'm reducing my flying experiences on this airline as there is no return of my undying love when I took the vow to "Love, Honor, and Obey", so we will just "Be Friends" from now on.

Nope, with the exception of perhaps the occasional g/a that doesn't cherish their job, there is NO Panky Panky going on with where a non-rev sits. Any g/a found to be screwing around (especially with lot's-a seniority) will get canned in a N.Y. minute and UA will replace them with 2 minimum wage part-timer's!
LilAbner is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 9:41 pm
  #35  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,424
Originally Posted by santarosaflyer
Had a similar experience two days ago. I was on a GPU - I had cleared NRT-SFO but not on BKK_NRT.

There were 5 open seats in GF and 1 in BF. There were a number of open seats in Y. Ten minutes before boarding I checked the list and the same names appear on the standbye list as well as the upgrade lists.

I politely asked the GA if there would be people sitting in BF that would be moved to GF. She said no.

After we had boarded I checked the list and GF was now full. The woman one of the GAs was chatting with socially while ignoring passengers in line was in one of the seats. I saw here name on the her boarding pass.

The OLD United in the past would have worked some of the passengers from BF (C) into GF (F) in order to accommodate more of the paying passengers.
You're complaining about the system working exactly as it is supposed to.

I don't believe it was ever pmUA policy to upgrade pax from J to F in order to create space for Y to J upgrades. For as long as I've been flying, the ability to score empty front cabin seats has been a well-earned perk for nonrevs. Who, by the way, are not at all well paid in terms of cash compensation.
Kacee is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 9:50 pm
  #36  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,621
Originally Posted by santarosaflyer
The OLD United in the past would have worked some of the passengers from BF (C) into GF (F) in order to accommodate more of the paying passengers.
That's not how it worked pre-merger, and it's not how it works now.
akonradi is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 10:04 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 217
Originally Posted by planemechanic
Senior leaders (very few people), traveling for business, are allowed to book into First directly. I have no idea, and no opinion, on what happened on this particular flight.
Although NRPS employees can book directly into J on 3-class airplanes.
Wayside is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 10:07 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: YVR SFO
Programs: UA G
Posts: 4,866
Originally Posted by santarosaflyer
The OLD United in the past would have worked some of the passengers from BF (C) into GF (F) in order to accommodate more of the paying passengers.
Uh, no. I died on the Y->C upgrade list for SFO-HKG and SFO-FRA in 2009 and 2010 with the flight going out with empty GF seats.
unavaca is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 10:14 pm
  #39  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,439
Originally Posted by Wayside
Although NRPS employees can book directly into J on 3-class airplanes.
In some cases, but not always. I have flown NRPS, and I have been denied a seat in Business Class even though the system showed as many as 30 seats open. It is limited.
planemechanic is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 10:24 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 8,634
Originally Posted by planemechanic
In some cases, but not always. I have flown NRPS, and I have been denied a seat in Business Class even though the system showed as many as 30 seats open. It is limited.
It's good to know that you guys deal with the PN availability issue too.
mgcsinc is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 11:18 pm
  #41  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 515
Originally Posted by CALMSP
based on what the computer shows right now (not the website, but SHARES), no one was listed for F other than employees. And only one got it, the others are in coach.
Based on your research, it appears that the Op didn't really get the story straight.

There could have been two employees on the GF upgrade list.

Originally Posted by Seat 1F
I think they pay the tax plus a bit more. Its minimal.
I was reading somewhere recently that United charges more than $600 for a long haul int'l GF seat and BA over a $1000. That's not petty change for someone who earns $50k

Originally Posted by Kacee
You're complaining about the system working exactly as it is supposed to.

I don't believe it was ever pmUA policy to upgrade pax from J to F in order to create space for Y to J upgrades. For as long as I've been flying, the ability to score empty front cabin seats has been a well-earned perk for nonrevs. Who, by the way, are not at all well paid in terms of cash compensation.
well said.

Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Mar 15, 2014 at 5:14 am Reason: Merge
iker is offline  
Old Mar 14, 2014, 11:51 pm
  #42  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SAN
Programs: AS MVP 100K, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Lifetime Titanium Elite, UA 1MM,
Posts: 1,707
Originally Posted by iker
I was reading somewhere recently that United charges more than $600 for a long haul int'l GF seat and BA over a $1000. That's not petty change for someone who earns $50k
It's not quite that much you pay. Much less than that. Can't speak to the BA charges, but I do know many EU governments (Germany for example), charge their employees "imputed income" on the flights they take. I did some calculations based on pass travel charges on day in 2005. It was cheaper for a UA employee to fly LH in international business class than it was for a LH employee to fly it.

Oh, and if you think those employees make $50k, you should go chat with more of them.

Originally Posted by twtrvl
There's no third-hand element to the post.

What happened to him is first-hand. If he repeats what the other pax told him that would be second-hand.
The fact that he was on the same flight is first hand. The fact that someone was passed up for GF as the OP presumes, well, that's not a first hand experience.

Originally Posted by santarosaflyer

The OLD United in the past would have worked some of the passengers from BF (C) into GF (F) in order to accommodate more of the paying passengers.
Not how it ever worked, sorry. No double upgrades was a standard rule and one that was most consistently applied. Before CPU, it would drive pax nuts to see open seats in C and F classes. So it didn't happen...Unless you are talking about an over sale situation. Then heck yes, lots of movement occurred to avoid VDBs. You had full support for doing that. Speaking from an employee's perspective who knew the policies.

I promise, I am not feeding you BS as you usually see on these forums full of people that think they knew how things worked because they flew a couple of times a year. Too much of that on here. Just trying to keep it real.

Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Mar 15, 2014 at 5:15 am Reason: Merge
JC5280 is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2014, 12:28 am
  #43  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Columbia, SC
Programs: UAL 1KMM,Hilton Diamond
Posts: 758
Sorry folks, I have been on at least two international flights where the gate agent did move folks up to work down the upgrade list. These were not overbooked flights. That may have not been the protocol but it did happen.

Once on a LHR-SFO, I was one of those move up and the GA said something to the effect, "We appreciate our 1Ks and we want to keep them happy." The other flight I believe was from SFO to either LHR or FRA and the GA announced that the were moving some people up for a similar reason and again this was not an overbooked flight.
santarosaflyer is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2014, 6:44 am
  #44  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: Marriott Ambassador, UA Mileage Plus 1K, AA Executive Plat, Marriott Ambassador Elite
Posts: 2,342
Originally Posted by Seat 1F
I think they pay the tax plus a bit more. Its minimal.
its more than minimal, couple hundred dollars.

Originally Posted by mgcsinc
It's good to know that you guys deal with the PN availability issue too.
in order to book into business class on a 3 class airplane, a certain class of service needs to be available. And that class of service is generally the first sold, so it can be tough to secure.

Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Mar 15, 2014 at 7:04 am Reason: Merge
CALMSP is offline  
Old Mar 15, 2014, 4:36 pm
  #45  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold, UA Nobody, Hilton Gold
Posts: 2,372
Originally Posted by iker
Based on your research, it appears that the Op didn't really get the story straight.
Well except as the OP didn't give the date of travel I question how anyone can have "researched" it.
alex_b is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.