Consolidated "United SYD/MEL Flight Delays or Cancellations" Thread [2014]
839 is currently delayed 50 minutes and counting (last official figure was 40) for maintenance. They just turned off the APU to check/fix something else (according to the first officer). Here's hoping they get it fixed soon...
Moderator Note: For Reference, the 2013 Consolidated UA SYD/MEL Delay/Cancellation thread is here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...ad-2013-a.html |
Thank you for that.
I'm flying out tomorrow SYD to SFO on UA 870 so fingers crossed but it does give me a sinking feeling. |
Originally Posted by ozflier
(Post 22136797)
Thank you for that.
I'm flying out tomorrow SYD to SFO on UA 870 so fingers crossed but it does give me a sinking feeling. 75 minutes and counting. The ground agent just told people that they could get off and walk up and down the jetway if they wanted to stretch their legs. That doesn't strike me as a good sign. Plus, she said, "I hope that pretty soon here we'll be able to deplane -- I mean depart." Hope that's not a Freudian slip... |
Originally Posted by IAD22066
(Post 22136827)
So if you have a replacement flight and a regularly scheduled flight leaving in the same evening, which is the better one to be on? I was in LA and a flight was cancelled on a Monday night because of mechanical issues. On Tuesday, it seemed like a lot of people on the Monday flight were trying to get on the Tuesday evening flight 839 without realizing that 1748 was going to get them there.
Originally Posted by QBK
(Post 22136778)
839 is currently delayed 50 minutes and counting (last official figure was 40) for maintenance.
Update: And now Cancelled |
Now 80 minutes late and canx .
Is there a way of telling which flight will be canx tomorrow SYD to LAX or SFO ? I would hope that knowing canx info early may mean I can be booked onto a flight with Qantas out of BNE but it would be to LAX. ( I was flying BNE-SYD to connect with 870 ). 350 or so pax is a lot the rebook at once out of SYD. The sad part is that I used a GPU to upgrade to BF thru to the USA. Has anyone had the experience of being rebooked on another carrier and put into the originally upgraded class rather than ticketed one - ie business rather than QF economy? |
Originally Posted by ozflier
(Post 22136893)
The sad part is that I used a GPU to upgrade to BF thru to the USA.
Has anyone had the experience of being rebooked on another carrier and put into the originally upgraded class rather than ticketed one - ie business rather than QF economy? Jeff
Originally Posted by ozflier
(Post 22136893)
Now 80 minutes late and canx .
Is there a way of telling which flight will be canx tomorrow SYD to LAX or SFO ? Jeff |
Well, thanks to my Flyertalk reflexes, I was on the phone with the 1K desk and rebooked on the UD before the cancellation was even announced on board.
Now I get to find out what the Custom Hotel (UA's choice) is like, and what they consider appropriate compensation. Any opinions here (on the latter question)? I'll read myself to sleep tonight on the customer compensation thread... |
So, I still going SYD- SFO tomoorow.
Sorry for all the pax at both ends who will end up not travelling on the same day. Interesting to see that there are still plenty of seats on other carriers to LAX. Maybe UA haven't started making the calls yet. I wonder why the SYD- SFO one has been preserved vs SYD- LAX. Perhaps because there are no direct flights out of SYD to SFO ( ie easier to accomodate SYD-LAX pax ) or maybe the later departing UA 870 fits in better with preserving the SYD-MEL connection. I live in BNE and note that there are plenty of seats on the direct Qantas flight out of there tomorrow to LAX. I am toying with the idea of ringing the 1K desk and offering to fly out of BNE instead of SYD but only if I was confirmed in QF business ( am on an upgraded W fare ). Surprisingly enough there is R space from LAX to my final destination ( at the moment anyway). Perhaps UA would take the opportunity to free up a BF seat on 870 but from my point of view ,they would have to pay QF for a J seat. I doubt it though. |
UA1763 is scheduled to leave LAX tonight at 8:30pm, arriving SYD at 6:08am on Tuesday. The seat map is fairly full (3F, 1C and a scattering of Y free) so I'm guessing very few people got re-routed onto other flights - not surprising as the last flights to Australia on other airlines left LAX only minutes after this flight was canceled.
|
Originally Posted by QBK
(Post 22136948)
Well, thanks to my Flyertalk reflexes, I was on the phone with the 1K desk and rebooked on the UD before the cancellation was even announced on board.
Now I get to find out what the Custom Hotel (UA's choice) is like, and what they consider appropriate compensation. Any opinions here (on the latter question)? I'll read myself to sleep tonight on the customer compensation thread... This is actually the second cancellation of SYD/MEL this year. There was one Jan 4 or so that weas mentioned in another thread. I wonder if we'll see 1 MX related cancellation a week -- that was more or less the track record in 2013. Those 777s cant come fast enough. -- Dan |
Originally Posted by debracey
(Post 22139101)
Happened to me just a few weeks ago. The compensation will be roughly 20K miles or a $350 domestic travel voucher.
This is actually the second cancellation of SYD/MEL this year. There was one Jan 4 or so that weas mentioned in another thread. I wonder if we'll see 1 MX related cancellation a week -- that was more or less the track record in 2013. Those 777s cant come fast enough. -- Dan Thanks for the info! $350 strikes me as awfully chintzy as compensation for missing a day of business in Sydney (before anybody flames me for not planning ahead, I did -- my original booking put me in SYD 24 hours before my urgent business, which I'll still make as long as the replacement flight doesn't cancel... but I was going to make use of that 24 hours). Anyway, I'll see what they offer. Annoyingly, after 45 minutes of trying every possible combination of my personal info and 20 minutes on the phone with .bomb support, I still can't get the system to recognize me. What makes me especially nervous is the posts from last year from people who got MXed two days in a row (because then I will be critically late). If the MX rate is 1/week, and there are 28 flights/week, then there's about a 4% chance for any given flight... which suggests about 0.15% chance of a double MX. Or about two per year. Which is consistent with last year's thread.
Originally Posted by docbert
(Post 22139009)
UA1763 is scheduled to leave LAX tonight at 8:30pm, arriving SYD at 6:08am on Tuesday. The seat map is fairly full (3F, 1C and a scattering of Y free) so I'm guessing very few people got re-routed onto other flights - not surprising as the last flights to Australia on other airlines left LAX only minutes after this flight was canceled.
Now, here's an interesting fact. There are seats for sale on both 839 and 1763 tonight. But whereas 839 has a fairly normal last-minute bucket distribution (R=2, in case anybody wants to jump on it!), I think revenue management screwed up 1763. There's nothing in discount buckets, but it's showing F9/J9/Y9/B9. Since there are definitely not 9 seats available in F or J, this looks like an opportunity for somebody with deep pockets, a large family, and high risk tolerance to engineer a lot of IDB compensation... ;) |
Originally Posted by QBK
(Post 22139730)
Dan,
Thanks for the info! $350 strikes me as awfully chintzy as compensation for missing a day of business in Sydney (before anybody flames me for not planning ahead, I did -- my original booking put me in SYD 24 hours before my urgent business, which I'll still make as long as the replacement flight doesn't cancel... but I was going to make use of that 24 hours). Anyway, I'll see what they offer. Annoyingly, after 45 minutes of trying every possible combination of my personal info and 20 minutes on the phone with .bomb support, I still can't get the system to recognize me. What makes me especially nervous is the posts from last year from people who got MXed two days in a row (because then I will be critically late). If the MX rate is 1/week, and there are 28 flights/week, then there's about a 4% chance for any given flight... which suggests about 0.15% chance of a double MX. Or about two per year. Which is consistent with last year's thread. That's almost exactly what 839 looked like last night before they cleared standby. Moreover, I was watching the standby list last night out of academic interest, and tonight's standby list looks mostly identical. (I feel for the one non-rev who actually cleared into GF last night... and will presumably be sweating it again tonight). Now, here's an interesting fact. There are seats for sale on both 839 and 1763 tonight. But whereas 839 has a fairly normal last-minute bucket distribution (R=2, in case anybody wants to jump on it!), I think revenue management screwed up 1763. There's nothing in discount buckets, but it's showing F9/J9/Y9/B9. Since there are definitely not 9 seats available in F or J, this looks like an opportunity for somebody with deep pockets, a large family, and high risk tolerance to engineer a lot of IDB compensation... ;) If you absolutely must get there, buy a fully refundable ticket on the 839 flight and cancel as soon as you know you're gonna go. If 1739 goes MX, hop off and get on 839. Of course, that might not even help, there have been many occasions where the flight turns round and comes back after various issues... (cabin pressure, fuel readings, etc.) If UA doesnt get you there in time for your meeting, you may be able to get a refund for "trip in vain" -- at the very least you can dispute their credit card charges and let Visa and United hash it out. If you have a good relationship with your CC vendor you should have no trouble. The good news is that you are in LAX, as a UA 1K you may be able to engineer some alternates on other carriers. The LAX staff are UA's best (in my opinion) and will do what they can so long as you're nice. Good luck! -- Dan EDIT: It is surprising to me that UA didn't ferry a 747 down from SFO and send you off during the day. Instead they delayed you for almost 24 hours which seems quite irresponsible. When I faced a similar situation in SFO back in Dec, they sent us out during the day and we arrived 12 hours late. Maybe your compensation will be higher since your delay is twice as long? |
Originally Posted by debracey
(Post 22140262)
Well, $350 is what they offered me on a deep discount econ ticket. They do offer more for the other fare buckets. You are correct about double MX cancellations. I flew back in Jan 2013 and several of my fellow passengers were double MX. That flight went out 100% full in all classes and the passengers were *very* upset.
Originally Posted by debracey
(Post 22140262)
If you absolutely must get there, buy a fully refundable ticket on the 839 flight and cancel as soon as you know you're gonna go. If 1739 goes MX, hop off and get on 839. Of course, that might not even help, there have been many occasions where the flight turns round and comes back after various issues... (cabin pressure, fuel readings, etc.) If UA doesnt get you there in time for your meeting, you may be able to get a refund for "trip in vain" -- at the very least you can dispute their credit card charges and let Visa and United hash it out. If you have a good relationship with your CC vendor you should have no trouble.
Originally Posted by debracey
(Post 22140262)
The good news is that you are in LAX, as a UA 1K you may be able to engineer some alternates on other carriers. The LAX staff are UA's best (in my opinion) and will do what they can so long as you're nice.
I wonder if part of the reason why they schedule the replacement flight earlier (8:30pm) is that, if the replacement goes MX, they have more options for rebooking (including the regularly scheduled 839)? And they also have the option of canceling the regularly scheduled flight and using the airplane for the already-delayed passengers. Presumably in some circumstances it's better to have 700 passengers delayed by 24 hours instead of 350 passengers delayed for 48 hours. |
What's different about this thread that it needs to be separate from all other international flights that are delayed/cancelled?
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...ts-2014-a.html -RM |
Originally Posted by RobOnLI
(Post 22140379)
What's different about this thread that it needs to be separate from all other international flights that are delayed/cancelled?
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...ts-2014-a.html It may get less posts if it was about the United SYD/MEL flights being on time :D ;) :( |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:43 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.