Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

MileagePlus Premier Qualifying Dollar (PQD) Requirement Discussion Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jan 1, 2014, 6:30 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: chrisl137
Please read these sources before posting in this thread:
If you have calculated the PQDs for a trip at less than 80% of the total cost, you are very likely doing something wrong. Have you made sure to include the International Surcharge (YQ)? Have you read all of the materials linked above, and the frequently made points listed below?

Specific Unanswered Questions
Please limit these to specific, technical questions about the implementation of the PQD program.
  • Will there be a calculator that shows PQD, and will that calculator be accurate?
  • What exactly will count toward PQD?
    United states:
    Base fare and carrier-imposed surcharges
    Flights flown by United, United Express, or Copa Airlines
    Flights operated by a Star Alliance® or a MileagePlus partner airline and issued on a United ticket (ticket number starting with 016)
    Economy Plus purchases
    The value of ETCs if used as a form of payment on the checkout page

    will count towards PQD.

    Thus:
    • The amount of co-pay when using miles to upgrade..
    • The cost of PQMs/RDMs purchased when using the premier / award accelerator..
    • The face value e-certs and travel vouchers.. (still uncertainty on this since prelim PQDs appeared to include)
    • The cost of a paid upgrade..
    • An extra seat purchase (such as for a customer of size or a musical instrument); it does not presently count toward PQM.
    • Change fees.
    will not count toward PQD.
  • How will PQD be determined for UA metal segments without 016 stock ticket?
  • What happens if I depart in December and return in January?
    Just like PQM, PQD for the applicable part of fare for the segment is credited based on the departure date (year) of the segment flown. Segment fares are calculated using standard rules of the past. For the case cited there would be PQD credited in DEC 2013 (no value) and PQD applied to 2014 applicable to 2014 and 2015 status renewal.
  • How will UA evaluate the address issue for the PQD exemption?
  • It is not clear how the timing of achieving the minimum PQD requirement will impact earning RPUs and GPUs. Examples:
    • If someone crosses 75K PQM in say April, but doesn't hit $7500 PQD until December by which time has accrued 200K PQM, will he/she get 10 RPUs all at once? (and 10 GPUs assuming $10k PQD in December)
    • Do only 1Ks/GSs earn additional RPUs by flying beyond the 100k mark?
    • If a 1K crosses the 100,000 PQM mark in January 201x, the $10,000 PQD mark on December 31 201x, and ends up flying a total of 200,000 PQMs for the year 201x, how many RPUs / GPUs will be earned?
    • Will Platinums earn 2 RPUs when crossing the 75k mark but none at incremental levels thereafter (e.g. a Plat who flies 100k EQMs, but does not meet the 1K spend, would *not* earn two more RPUs)?
  • How does IRROPs affect earning of PQDs?
    • If one travels on a non-016 ticket originally booked non-UA/Copa metal, will one earn PQDs if rebooked onto UA?
    • If one travels on a non-016 ticket originally booked on UA/Copa metal, but is rebooked onto non UA/Copa metal, will one still get credit for PQDs in these scenarios:
      • The UA/Copa segment was the source of the irrops?
      • The segment of another carrier causes the irrops, the carrier is a *A or UA/Copa partner?
      • The segment of another carrier causes the irrops, the carrier is not a *A or UA/Copa partner?
FMP (Frequently Made Points)
The following points have been made repeatedly in this thread (please feel free to add more concise points):
  • You might not be hitting the PQD minimums as easily as you think you are, given exceptions, taxes, and the existence of cheap fares.
  • It is possible for leisure travelers and even some business travelers to average well under 10cpm. This doesn't just affect "leisure 1Ks" and people on the edge of categories.
  • Presidential Plus card members (exempted from Silver/Gold/Plat PQD requirements) are most likely exempted because the FlexPQM program would complicate matters.
  • Manufacturing $25,000 spend might not actually be so hard. There's a whole forum on it.
  • The $25,000 spend can be done across multiple Chase MP cards, as long as the cards are tied to the same MileagePlus account.
  • The exceptions don't really make sense where there is a revenue-sharing joint venture in place, such as with LH on TATL routes.
  • Leaving UA for AA over objections to dollar-based status may be futile because all the majors will likely go to this model with the possible exception of the AS program which allows you to bank your DL and AA miles into one account (DL has already).
  • UA is tracking spend on UA metal now.
  • YQ, also known as the "international surcharge," is a carrier-imposed surcharge and is included in PQD.
Related Threads
Moderator's note:

Previous thread can be found here:


MileagePlus Premier Qualifying Dollar (PQD) Requirement Discussion [ARCHIVE]

iluv2fly
Moderator, UA
Print Wikipost

MileagePlus Premier Qualifying Dollar (PQD) Requirement Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 1, 2014, 9:31 am
  #31  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, AA, DL
Posts: 7,418
Originally Posted by eyuro
Between me and you I only bought the EQM's for the 6 GPU's. The other status's are not needed because of my MM status, but I also don't know if I will be able to reach 1K this year. Even with the 5 RT's to HK I will fall way short in the PQD department. Is there any talk about UA allowing PQD purchases? It will go straight to the bottom line! No miles, just PQD's.
Also wondering - if you don't fly a ticket, and don't cancel it for later use, do you get the PQDs?

Originally Posted by love_to_travel
Although we knew that Presidential Plus card holders would be exempt from PQD requirements up to Platinum, it's good to get a confirmation on my personal account that I am indeed eligible for the exemption. I will miss being 1K though.
Whatever we think of the PQD requirement, at least United has changed the website and iPhone app to be transparent as to what you've accumulated (or they think, at that point in time, you've accumulated).

Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Jan 1, 2014 at 11:12 am Reason: merge and removed image
drewguy is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2014, 9:54 am
  #32  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Carolina
Programs: UA LT Gold, American Kettle, Hertz #1 Presidents Circle, Marriott LT Platinum
Posts: 927
Taxes/Fees difference between Purchase Summary and Receipt

Originally Posted by anc-ord772
Anyone know if UNITED plans to show how many PQD are earned when shopping/buying a ticket?
Well I already have noticed a glitch as regarded to this. I bought a ticket on 12/30 for travel in 2014. The Final Screen after buying the ticket shows the purchase summary.

1 Adult - 664.86
Taxes/Fees - 91.30

But .....

Yesterday I viewed my actual receipt for the flight and it shows different values in the Fare Information breakdown.

Airfare 618.74
Taxes 137.69

The difference is exactly the amount for the Federal Transportation Tax of 46.39.

In the screen displayed right after purchase this is included in Airfare Portion and not the Taxes/Fees.

On the Purchase Summary Screen the Taxes/Fees is a hyperlink, but I did not follow it then. I'll have to try on my next purchase to see what it displays on the Taxes/Fees details.

I'm wondering if not presenting the correct Taxes/Fees on the Purchase Summary is any kind of violation of the DOT regulations pertaining to Fare Displays?

And of course the only reason I noticed, is that I'm tracking my own PQD Spend on the Spreadsheet I use to keep UA honest (CPUs/Mileage/TSA PRE, Equipment, etc.).

So I guess the moral of this story is to always check your actual receipt for PQDs.

Happy New Year
drowelf is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2014, 10:13 am
  #33  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,877


Starting over at $0.00. Will be an interesting year to say the least.

Looks like UA also updated the qualification chart a little:

DelrayChris is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2014, 10:25 am
  #34  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
Originally Posted by mecabq
in case we move back to the U.S. during the year.
"Move back during the year" - Ha, that's a good one!

Originally Posted by eyuro
Am I wrong in assuming that award accelerator purchases are probably going to go down for UA? I have an award ticket booked to BUD in late April. I usually would have purchased the miles and added on the EQM's also. But now this money doesn't count towards PQD's, why bother? I will continue the miles purchase for the .02 cpm but leave off the EQM's. Such a shame!
Follow the conversation as it develops in this thread:

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...es-2014-a.html

At this point, United has not made it clear if there will be any way to earn PQD's through an Elite Maximizer type purchase.

Mods - maybe lock the 2013 thread to new postings?

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...2013-a-58.html

Last edited by iluv2fly; Jan 1, 2014 at 12:57 pm Reason: merge
LarkSFO is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2014, 10:50 am
  #35  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus
Posts: 35,415
Originally Posted by anc-ord772
Anyone know if UNITED plans to show how many PQD are earned when shopping/buying a ticket?
I would not expect to see that. The PQM calculation at purchase time is far easier, yet that is often displayed incorrectly.
Originally Posted by mecabq
+1 It's unfortunate that they don't display PQD to non-U.S. members, so that we can track for future benchmarking and, more importantly, as you say, in case we move back to the U.S. during the year.
I'm sure UA is tracking that information even if it is not being displayed. i think that displaying it would only serve to confuse customers.

Originally Posted by eyuro
Is there any talk about UA allowing PQD purchases? It will go straight to the bottom line! No miles, just PQD's.
I think they're looking to cut off the low hanging fruit with the whole PQD thing and that they really are after customers with a much higher spend than what the cutoffs are. For that reason alone I'd say that selling PQD is extremely unlikely.

Originally Posted by drewguy
Also wondering - if you don't fly a ticket, and don't cancel it for later use, do you get the PQDs?
You earn PQD when you fly a qualifying paid segment, not when you buy or abandon a ticket

Originally Posted by drowelf
Well I already have noticed a glitch as regarded to this. I bought a ticket on 12/30 for travel in 2014. ...I'm wondering if not presenting the correct Taxes/Fees on the Purchase Summary is any kind of violation of the DOT regulations pertaining to Fare Displays?
I guess we'll have to see how accurate the purchase screen quotes are. I'm tracking my purchases as well. As far as the DT is concerned, I thought the airlines are required to display the entire price and that any breakdown is the just the airline trying to show how much of the price consists of taxes.
Xyzzy is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2014, 10:55 am
  #36  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PIT
Programs: OZ Diamond, UA Gold
Posts: 9,919
Flying back home today/tomorrow, this being a return for a trip that we flew in Dec. Will be interested to see if half the airfare get's posted as PQDs because all segments were flown after the first.
dinoscool3 is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2014, 10:58 am
  #37  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,581
Originally Posted by Xyzzy
I think they're looking to cut off the low hanging fruit with the whole PQD thing and that they really are after customers with a much higher spend than what the cutoffs are. For that reason alone I'd say that selling PQD is extremely unlikely.
Let's consider 2 customers.

#1 flies 100,000 miles in 2014, and spends $10,001.00 in PQD. #2 flies 80,000 in 2014, spends $8,000 in PQD, and purchases 20,001 PQM miles that cost $2,001.00. Customer #1 spent $10,001.00 with United, and Customer #2 spent $10,001.00 with United.

Why is customer #2 "low hanging fruit" when his/her spend was the same as customer #1? Since customer #2 didn't occupy 20,000 miles worth of seat, enabling UA to sell that seat to someone else, isn't customer #2 more beneficial to UA's bottom line?
halls120 is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2014, 11:05 am
  #38  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,139
Originally Posted by eyuro
Even with the 5 RT's to HK I will fall way short in the PQD department. Is there any talk about UA allowing PQD purchases? It will go straight to the bottom line! No miles, just PQD's.
If you're willing to do that, why not just buy a higher fare class? It has the same effect.
mahasamatman is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2014, 11:11 am
  #39  
Moderator: United Airlines
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,849
Originally Posted by drowelf
Well I already have noticed a glitch as regarded to this. ....
works as intended and as it has for awhile

Originally Posted by drowelf
.... I bought a ticket on 12/30 for travel in 2014. The Final Screen after buying the ticket shows the purchase summary.

1 Adult - 664.86
Taxes/Fees - 91.30

But .....

Yesterday I viewed my actual receipt for the flight and it shows different values in the Fare Information breakdown.

Airfare 618.74
Taxes 137.69

The difference is exactly the amount for the Federal Transportation Tax of 46.39.

In the screen displayed right after purchase this is included in Airfare Portion and not the Taxes/Fees.

On the Purchase Summary Screen the Taxes/Fees is a hyperlink, but I did not follow it then. I'll have to try on my next purchase to see what it displays on the Taxes/Fees details.

I'm wondering if not presenting the correct Taxes/Fees on the Purchase Summary is any kind of violation of the DOT regulations pertaining to Fare Displays?
....
So I guess the moral of this story is to always check your actual receipt for PQDs.
....
This relates to the 7.5% excise tax

We been around the block with this discussion in http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/unite...-web-site.html

Thoughts were some of this is related to DoT pricing requirements. The final receipt is correct.
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2014, 11:12 am
  #40  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Between AUS, EWR, and YTO In a little twisty maze of airline seats, all alike.. but I wanna go home with the armadillo
Programs: CO, NW, & UA forum moderator emeritus
Posts: 35,415
Originally Posted by dinoscool3
Flying back home today/tomorrow, this being a return for a trip that we flew in Dec. Will be interested to see if half the airfare get's posted as PQDs because all segments were flown after the first.
PQDs will post along with the segments flown. Any qualifying segments for flights taken in 2014 will pst PQD regardless of when the tickets were purchased and what other segments are on the ticket.

Originally Posted by halls120
Why is customer #2 "low hanging fruit" when his/her spend was the same as customer #1? Since customer #2 didn't occupy 20,000 miles worth of seat, enabling UA to sell that seat to someone else, isn't customer #2 more beneficial to UA's bottom line?
I don't disagree with you at all but I think UA would tell you that they'd rather save the status for someone who spent even mre.

Last edited by iluv2fly; Jan 1, 2014 at 12:57 pm Reason: merge
Xyzzy is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2014, 11:21 am
  #41  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SEA
Programs: UA SP, DL SM MM, AS 75K, SPG Platinum, Hyatt Diamond.
Posts: 2,596
Execution lacks transparancy

I looked this morning too, and was very disappointed at the lack of transparency in the process. When you book a ticket it does not show you what PQD's you will earn for that flight before you finalize the purchase. Since Delta does do this, I have to give them more credit toward being upfront with the nonsensical idea of dollar tracking for qualification.

I still feel strongly, that if a revenue component of qualification was necessary (and I'm not arguing that it was not necessary) it would have been far more simple to limit PQM's on certain fare buckets. The strategy below would be so much better than the methodology of hocus pocus, abracadabra, black art juju.

On N maybe you only earn 25% for example, on G 30%, on K 35% on L 40% and T 45% and on S 50%. finally, on W you would get your 100% PQM qualification as this fare is also required for international upgrade using an instrument. This method would have been so much easier for everyone to track, AND it would have been a unique approach rather that just mimicking a competitor, and then executing it poorly.
transportbiz is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2014, 11:35 am
  #42  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Programs: DL Platinum, AA Lifetime Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Platinum, Radisson Premium
Posts: 6,638
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 7_0_4 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.0 Mobile/11B554a Safari/9537.53)

Originally Posted by transportbiz
I looked this morning too, and was very disappointed at the lack of transparency in the process. When you book a ticket it does not show you what PQD's you will earn for that flight before you finalize the purchase. Since Delta does do this, I have to give them more credit toward being upfront with the nonsensical idea of dollar tracking for qualification.

I still feel strongly, that if a revenue component of qualification was necessary (and I'm not arguing that it was not necessary) it would have been far more simple to limit PQM's on certain fare buckets. The strategy below would be so much better than the methodology of hocus pocus, abracadabra, black art juju.

On N maybe you only earn 25% for example, on G 30%, on K 35% on L 40% and T 45% and on S 50%. finally, on W you would get your 100% PQM qualification as this fare is also required for international upgrade using an instrument. This method would have been so much easier for everyone to track, AND it would have been a unique approach rather that just mimicking a competitor, and then executing it poorly.
In my view, United is intentionally being vague and untransparent about it. Question is why?
demkr is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2014, 11:37 am
  #43  
Ambassador: Alaska Airlines
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: BWI
Posts: 7,390
Originally Posted by transportbiz
On N maybe you only earn 25% for example, on G 30%, on K 35% on L 40% and T 45% and on S 50%. finally, on W you would get your 100% PQM qualification as this fare is also required for international upgrade using an instrument. This method would have been so much easier for everyone to track, AND it would have been a unique approach rather that just mimicking a competitor, and then executing it poorly.
Agreed ^

And they can make it all consistent for all partners earnings.
golfingboy is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2014, 11:57 am
  #44  
Moderator: United Airlines
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,849
Originally Posted by transportbiz
I looked this morning too, and was very disappointed at the lack of transparency in the process. When you book a ticket it does not show you what PQD's you will earn for that flight before you finalize the purchase. ....
and neither does it show (correctly in all cases) the number of PQMs or RDMs. We learned to live with that (unhappily)

Originally Posted by transportbiz
.... I still feel strongly, that if a revenue component of qualification was necessary (and I'm not arguing that it was not necessary) it would have been far more simple to limit PQM's on certain fare buckets. The strategy below would be so much better than the methodology of hocus pocus, abracadabra, black art juju.

On N maybe you only earn 25% for example, on G 30%, on K 35% on L 40% and T 45% and on S 50%. finally, on W you would get your 100% PQM qualification as this fare is also required for international upgrade using an instrument. This method would have been so much easier for everyone to track, AND it would have been a unique approach rather that just mimicking a competitor, and then executing it poorly.
That seems a far more complicated approach. From what I can tell so far is the PQD approach (using the receipt as a source of information) is going to be relatively easily job to track.

Yes change is a pain (anger, denial and resistance is understandable) but I think after a few months we will all be in the groove on tracking this. Could have other ways have been used yes, but at least two major players in the industry have picked this way and it is likely to stick. You can complain, you can invent other ways --- but you better get comfortable with this one because it is here, now.
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2014, 12:04 pm
  #45  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 64
PQD

I am one of those unique cases who actually has a permanent residence outside USA, but living in USA temporarily for many years now. I logged in this morning to check out the website and was confused as I did not see the PQD line. I logged back and forth and to see if that gets fixed and then when I looked at my address it was showing my non-US address. I thought I had my current US address on there (maybe I changed it a while back and forgot, but, I cannot recall doing it). Now, I'm contemplating changing it to my US address so I can have a accurate(trusting United) representation of my PQD, but, wondering if there are any cons to "moving back to USA"
sriki is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.