Any plans to rebuild the UA concourse (C and D gates & UX terminal) at IAD / Dulles?
#316
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,530
#317
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 39
http://www.metwashairports.com/sites...ust%202002.pdf
Since then, however, costs are a bigger concern for IAD, so they would likely want to revise this plan.
#318
Join Date: Aug 2011
Programs: UA 2P, UC, Hertz 5*, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 513
I know this is pure speculation on my part, but is this a glimmer of hope that UA will at least start negotiating with MWAA to build a new C/D concourse at IAD?
Senior Project Manager ? Corporate Real Estate Job in Washington, DC United
Senior Project Manager ? Corporate Real Estate Job in Washington, DC United
#319
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dulles, VA
Programs: UA Life Gold, Marriott Life Titanium
Posts: 2,757
Until the Metro extension is completed, MWAA isn't going to do anything new at either Dulles or National. Rates on the Toll Road are about to go through the roof to pay for the extension - what was $0.50 15 years ago is $2.50 today and going up to north of $3.50 soon. So, they are not swimming in cash right now. That said, the design for the new C/D has been completed for years, which is why the Train to Nowhere ends up where it does. A lot of design work and building plans are done, so as soon as United ponies up the money to lease a new terminal for 30+ years, they could get bids out pretty quickly.
As I always say though, I once took a school field trip to check out the "temporary" terminals when they were about to open. That was in 1985, I believe. The "permanent" terminal was supposed to begin construction around 1990. 33 years later, they're still temporary.
As I always say though, I once took a school field trip to check out the "temporary" terminals when they were about to open. That was in 1985, I believe. The "permanent" terminal was supposed to begin construction around 1990. 33 years later, they're still temporary.
Last edited by catocony; Jul 9, 2018 at 8:20 am
#320
#321
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, AA, DL
Posts: 7,418
#322
Join Date: Aug 2011
Programs: UA 2P, UC, Hertz 5*, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 513
Until the Metro extension is completed, MWAA isn't going to do anything new at either Dulles or National. Rates on the Toll Road are about to go through the roof to pay for the extension - what was $0.50 15 years ago is $2.50 today and going up to north of $3.50 soon. So, they are not swimming in cash right now. That said, the design for the new C/D has been completed for years, which is why the Train to Nowhere ends up where it does. A lot of design work and building plans are done, so as soon as United ponies up the money to lease a new terminal for 30+ years, they could get bids out pretty quickly.
As I always say though, I once took a school field trip to check out the "temporary" terminals when they were about to open. That was in 1985, I believe. The "permanent" terminal was supposed to begin construction around 1990. 33 years later, they're still temporary.
As I always say though, I once took a school field trip to check out the "temporary" terminals when they were about to open. That was in 1985, I believe. The "permanent" terminal was supposed to begin construction around 1990. 33 years later, they're still temporary.
#323
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: UA*Lifetime GS, Hyatt* Lifetime Globalist
Posts: 12,318
I know this is pure speculation on my part, but is this a glimmer of hope that UA will at least start negotiating with MWAA to build a new C/D concourse at IAD?
Senior Project Manager ? Corporate Real Estate Job in Washington, DC United
Senior Project Manager ? Corporate Real Estate Job in Washington, DC United
#324
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Raleigh
Programs: United GS 2MM,, Marriott/Starwood Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 754
That said, the design for the new C/D has been completed for years, which is why the Train to Nowhere ends up where it does. A lot of design work and building plans are done, so as soon as United ponies up the money to lease a new terminal for 30+ years, they could get bids out quickly .
#325
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DCA, IAD (not BWI if I can help it)
Programs: UA 1MM 1K, Marriott Gold, Hyatt Explorist, status-free on AA, AS, B6, DL, WN, Amtrak, etc.
Posts: 1,480
Summary of FFG lunch chatter
• Everybody hates the C/D concourse. Fun fact: Because it consists of separate facilities joined together (I guess that's why you have those corridors that slope up or down), it doesn't have any kind of central HVAC system. However, people in Chicago may not quite realize how bad it is.
• UA is no longer neglecting IAD: Flights and passenger volumes are way up, and management seems to have realized the asset they have for north-south connecting flights that would earlier have gone to EWR, where they can be the first ones delayed or cancelled.
• But United still doesn't like the debt at IAD, in particular that for the Aerotrain. I've tried to look up when that comes off the books but haven't been able to find out; however, since that project began in 2003, it can't be that far off. Right? The airline is also concerned about IAD's cost per emplanement, although that's been trending down. Per this Feb. 2018 report in the Cleveland Plain Dealer, at $20.95 it's now below EWR's $28.05 (and EWR has its own expensive projects coming, the Terminal A replacement and the PATH extension). Finally, UA really favors keeping the DCA perimeter rule.
• My sense is that UA both wants to see MWAA retire a bunch more debt and agree to kick in more to replace the C/D concourse. And if the airline's going to build out an extension to the C concourse for a Polaris Lounge, it must not see that coming in the next several years. Marginal upgrades to C/D may happen in the meantime - the station manager mentioned things like bigger windows and higher ceilings.
In short, IAD has at least a few more years to go serving as America's most persuasive argument for flying with *G status.
#326
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,530
• My sense is that UA both wants to see MWAA retire a bunch more debt and agree to kick in more to replace the C/D concourse. And if the airline's going to build out an extension to the C concourse for a Polaris Lounge, it must not see that coming in the next several years. Marginal upgrades to C/D may happen in the meantime - the station manager mentioned things like bigger windows and higher ceilings.
In short, IAD has at least a few more years to go serving as America's most persuasive argument for flying with *G status.
In short, IAD has at least a few more years to go serving as America's most persuasive argument for flying with *G status.
#327
• My sense is that UA both wants to see MWAA retire a bunch more debt and agree to kick in more to replace the C/D concourse. And if the airline's going to build out an extension to the C concourse for a Polaris Lounge, it must not see that coming in the next several years. Marginal upgrades to C/D may happen in the meantime - the station manager mentioned things like bigger windows and higher ceilings.
#328
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,530
Just another nail in the coffin for a new C/D concourse. As long as UA has no perceived competition there, customers will be treated accordingly.
#329
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DCA, IAD (not BWI if I can help it)
Programs: UA 1MM 1K, Marriott Gold, Hyatt Explorist, status-free on AA, AS, B6, DL, WN, Amtrak, etc.
Posts: 1,480
#330
Suspended
Join Date: May 2018
Location: ord
Programs: UA 1k SPG Platinum
Posts: 365
I know this is pure speculation on my part, but is this a glimmer of hope that UA will at least start negotiating with MWAA to build a new C/D concourse at IAD?
Senior Project Manager ? Corporate Real Estate Job in Washington, DC United
Senior Project Manager ? Corporate Real Estate Job in Washington, DC United