EWR - EZE ending.

Reply

Old Jul 13, 13, 1:28 pm
  #1
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,326
EWR - EZE ending.

Effective 9/29 EWR - EZE will be ending. IAH - EZE will be the only flight into EZE. Flight will use 2-cabin 763.
JOSECONLSCREW28 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 13, 1:32 pm
  #2
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,674
IAH-OGG lost 764 to the new (at that time) IAH-EZE route. Let's have IAH-OGG back.

It isn't gonna happen. Just wishful thinking on my part.

Argentina's a basket case. Gov't believes in no sanctity of contract. BA and Mendoza are still great places to go otherwise (although Mendoza is easier reached via Santiago, anyway)...

Last edited by IAH-OIL-TRASH; Jul 13, 13 at 1:42 pm
IAH-OIL-TRASH is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 13, 1:48 pm
  #3
TA
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: if it's Thursday, this must be Belgium
Programs: UA 1K MM
Posts: 5,830
side question, but does Santiago Chile just never have enough market to make it on UA's radar?
TA is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 13, 1:55 pm
  #4
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Osaka
Programs: United Mileage Plus Premier Executive
Posts: 494
Not surprised! The service really was bad when I flew it with a PMCO crew! Out of IAD I always had a choice of F class and a PMUA crew. It seems PMCO management can't handle international routes very well and compete as SEA NRT is going 787. It is sad to see a great PMUA route structure being dismantled by PMCO! I will not fly IAH-EZE on a 2 class 767 with a PMCO crew. I will fly American or LAN now to Argentina.
Pi7473000 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 13, 1:57 pm
  #5
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: United Premier 1K 1MM; SPG Plat; Hyatt Plat; Marriott Plat; Hertz Pres Cirlce
Posts: 2,076
I haven't been tracking developments in Argentina but what's going on here? US travel market is really focused on S. America (really Brazil, Chile and Argentina) so this is somewhat surprising.....wonder if anyone has more fidelity on the rationale behind this decision...
mh3265a is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 13, 1:58 pm
  #6
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,326
Originally Posted by Pi7473000 View Post
Not surprised! The service really was bad when I flew it with a PMCO crew! Out of IAD I always had a choice of F class and a PMUA crew. It seems PMCO management can't handle international routes very well and compete as SEA NRT is going 787. It is sad to see a great PMUA route structure being dismantled by PMCO! I will not fly IAH-EZE on a 2 class 767 with a PMCO crew. I will fly American or LAN now to Argentina.
You have absolutely no clue whatsoever what you are talking about. You do realize that EWR - EZE is currently flown with a 2-cabin sUA 763 flown with :gasp: a sUA crew oh and wait for it.....IAH - EZE is also flown by a 2-cabin sUA 763 with oh wait an sUA crew as well.
JOSECONLSCREW28 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 13, 2:02 pm
  #7
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Gold, WN, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 765
With the high fixed costs of the route, plus with Argentine economy not doing well, UA cannot make any money. But DL is able to make ATL to EZE work and there is much less O & D on that route compared to EWR-EZE. So UA is doing some thing wrong besides other issues.
hyho61 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 13, 2:18 pm
  #8
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ORD-LAS
Programs: UA MM Gold, WN Companion,Hyatt Diamond, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold
Posts: 4,277
Originally Posted by Pi7473000 View Post
Not surprised! The service really was bad when I flew it with a PMCO crew! Out of IAD I always had a choice of F class and a PMUA crew. It seems PMCO management can't handle international routes very well and compete as SEA NRT is going 787. It is sad to see a great PMUA route structure being dismantled by PMCO! I will not fly IAH-EZE on a 2 class 767 with a PMCO crew. I will fly American or LAN now to Argentina.
You are wrong. Please check the facts before posting things like this. I love sUA but sCO crews have been great on my last few flights. It's hit or miss on both sides.

Sad to see another international route go.

Last edited by LASUA1K; Jul 13, 13 at 2:23 pm
LASUA1K is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 13, 2:19 pm
  #9
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,326
Originally Posted by LASUA1K View Post
You are wrong. Please check the facts before posting things like this. I love sUA but sCO crews have been great on my last few flights. It's it or miss on both sides.

Sad to see another international route go.
+1
JOSECONLSCREW28 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 13, 2:46 pm
  #10
Original Member
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,111
Originally Posted by Pi7473000 View Post
It seems PMCO management can't handle international routes very well and compete as SEA NRT is going 787.
The addition of DEN-NRT did the 777 in for SEA-NRT as now the Denver pax don't have to go through Seattle which many did on that route.
ncorman is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 13, 2:54 pm
  #11
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: LHR (sometimes CLE, SFO, BOS, LAX, SEA)
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 5,710
Bummer, I really liked IAD-EZE before they discontinued that in favor of EWR-EZE.

At least there's still PTY.
mherdeg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 13, 2:55 pm
  #12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 30 miles south IAD 1R
Posts: 33,981
Originally Posted by LASUA1K View Post
You are wrong. Please check the facts before posting things like this. I love sUA but sCO crews have been great on my last few flights. It's hit or miss on both sides.

Sad to see another international route go.
Any thought to going back to IAD-EZE? Maybe moving it out of IAD was a mistake.
halls120 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 13, 3:37 pm
  #13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1KMM, AA PLT, SPG Plat100/LTG, Marriott GLD, Hertz PC
Posts: 17,682
Bummer - I just did this route a couple months ago. Let's just say it was Employee Class in C each way though.

Doesn't help when you're charging $2K for a W fare though...I would have happily cancelled my award booking and paid for the tickets and used GPUs, if not for the out-of-whack pricing (with far less than full cabins).
UA-NYC is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 13, 3:38 pm
  #14
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Programs: One Pass
Posts: 250
EWR - IST is gone also at the end of October.
Cbmaz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Jul 13, 13, 3:45 pm
  #15
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: ES, SG, US
Programs: UA 1K 2MM, AA EXPLAT
Posts: 1,494
I was stunned how poorly PMUA did on their long-haul LatAm flights relative to AA and DL. I realize AA has an enormous edge with their MIA hub, but it appeared that DFW was also doing well, given they are double-daily from there to certain cities, and at times with 777s.

Once CO took over I assumed the Southern Cone flights would get help. NYC is a good O&D market - stronger than IAD - and CO had a larger presence/consumer base in the region.

However, it looks like UA couldn't make EZE work from the East Coast. Guess AA will be happy...
cmhua777 is offline  
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:21 am.

Home - News - Forum - Hotel Reviews - Glossary - Contact Us - Airport Code Lookup - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy - Cookie Policy - Advertise on FlyerTalk - Archive - Top

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by Flyertalk.com. Copyright 2017 FlyerTalk.com. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.