![]() |
Originally Posted by GroundStop
(Post 20607056)
Don't think I've ever received a notification of a CPU clearing
|
Originally Posted by mgcsinc
(Post 20607139)
The checkerboard pattern makes this particularly odd -- I've seen families checkerboard-ed across F.
|
Originally Posted by hobo13
(Post 20607184)
So are you saying that the example I provided is 'odd', or that the result of the algorithm results in odd seating for families? I would agree with the latter. That's my point.
|
Is there a method to the upgrade seating algorithm?
Interesting...when I get an advance CPU, ice found that I am always seated per my aisle preference assuming there is one and it assigns a seat at all.
There have also been a handful of times when I get the email saying seats will be assigned at the airport, I go online to select a seat, and it doesn't take, because apparently it decided to assign a different seat just ehen I went to select one. I find this very odd behavior. |
Originally Posted by star_world
(Post 20606603)
You are wrong on the last part - they absolutely do clear standbys into E- now by default as part of the automated process. See for yourself next time you're standing at a gate with some time to spare. This might have been true at some time in the past but it's not true now. You can either look at the cleared standbys screen, or the seatmap itself.
|
Originally Posted by mgcsinc
(Post 20607144)
Check your email preferences.
Note that I went 2/2 last week on AA w/T-100 UGs and UG emails like clockwork though...somehow they've figured it out |
Originally Posted by tuolumne
(Post 20607759)
:rolleyes: You're *absolutely* wrong, and have little idea what you're talking about.
SHARES clears NRSA starting in the E+ cabin based on seniority. They absolutely do not clear them into E-. |
I've never cleared CPU without an email.
|
Originally Posted by channa
(Post 20606588)
Sort of. CPU processes in a checkerboard:
1A, 1E 2B, 2F 3A, 3E and so on. At the gate, all standby lists are cleared front to back with no regard to preference or E+, IME. So First will fill up straight front to back, left to right. |
although spotty right after the merger, i have been receiving my upgrade emails about 20-30 minutes after the upgrade window opens (for the flights i have cleared - which has been the majority in 2013)
|
Originally Posted by star_world
(Post 20607878)
And then read my post - I'm not talking about NRSAs, nor do I care about them. Of course NRSAs go into E+. I'm talking about revenue passengers on standby. |
Originally Posted by tuolumne
(Post 20607759)
:rolleyes: You're *absolutely* wrong, and have little idea what you're talking about.
SHARES clears NRSA starting in the E+ cabin based on seniority. They absolutely do not clear them into E-. Thankfully this was reprogrammed in mid to late 2012. I still prefer how legacy UA agents usually clear NRSA - one by one at the podium, and letting you know what seats are open. |
Originally Posted by boat9781
(Post 20607954)
I've never cleared CPU without an email.
|
Originally Posted by hobo13
(Post 20607101)
This is actually a difference between United and PMUA. PMUA didn't use to assign seats when a UDU cleared. You had to log in and do it. But now that there is an algorithm (front to back) that does it, two 1K companions travelling together on different locators have a much harder time of getting seats together because even if you log in right away after a sweep, the algorithm has already put pax in seats, and thus the cement has set.
And while this really is a first world problem, this has become the hardest thing to acquire in this day in age of CPUs and especially ToD upgrades - two seats together. My wife and I fly a lot and now that we have a baby, it isn't easy to be worrying about the baby+supplies and then ask folks if they don't mind swapping out seats, since it seems that if my CPU clears as a 1K, there are no other seats at all to select from. I really really miss PMUA's way of doing this - I could *always* get two seats together, since I was active and *knew* when my upgrade would go through, since NF space was visible! Wow, what a thought - systems that actually worked and were predictable...oh wait, Jeffy Jeff wouldn't make enough cash to fill his pockets with, if he did that! :td: :td: :td: -jeremy |
Originally Posted by kmfdm91
(Post 20609240)
My wife and I fly a lot and now that we have a baby On the other hand, I have yet to find anyone who refuses to swap seats considering their alternative is to sit next to a baby, LOL! Interestingly, we went from being a 6A/6B couple on a 757 to a 1A/1B couple after kids. Unfortunately, it's almost impossible to get the F bulkhead anymore because the CO algorithm auto-fills that row, whereas PMUA assumed (rightly so) that the F bulkhead was the least desirable seats in the cabin and thus the bulkhead seats often were available right up until the finally UGers were cleared at the gate. And yes, it is truly a FirstWorldProblem..... and for sure, don't even THINK about complaining about it to any of your other parent friends! It's also not a topic that usually comes up on the MommyBlogs. ;) |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:47 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.