Jeff comments on loss of "unmanaged" corporate traffic/PRASM at JP Morgan conference.
#16
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Programs: UA 1K, AA PLT, SPG PLT
Posts: 1,612
What’s seems to be missing is the “how” - as in how is UA going to get these corp flyers back? Smisek says the operational performance is better, but so what? UA isn’t outperforming the competition, so it would seem that the HFVs who have left (and don’t have any complaints with their current preferred carrier) would have no reason to look at UA again, especially considering UA is the one that screwed up in the first place.
I don't know what I'm missing (I'm in the business of consulting and IT), but from this thread and the 'UA trying to win back customers' thread...they both say the same thing:
We at UA are great. We KNOW that the business flyers are coming back and we know that doing what we do is what people want.
No how, no why, no explanations, and most importantly - no numbers/metrics.
I know this is the mentality of PMCO, but this is just asisine...that is unless for some reason people in high spending companies ARE getting word from UA and benefits, but I haven't heard of any reports.
Am I dense, or is this the perception of what's going on as well?
-jeremy
#18
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,172
...I know this is the mentality of PMCO, but this is just asisine...that is unless for some reason people in high spending companies ARE getting word from UA and benefits, but I haven't heard of any reports.
Am I dense, or is this the perception of what's going on as well?
-jeremy
Am I dense, or is this the perception of what's going on as well?
-jeremy
Our current situation is a product of disorganization, lack of planning, no strategy, bad execution coupled with the arrogance that resulted from cramming two totally dissimilar organizations into one gigantic whole that now thinks it rules the airline universe based on size and route coverage alone - hence the 'take it or leave it' attitude many on the TA side of the house felt before it was lathered on customers.
#19
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ONT, SNA, LAX
Programs: UA Plat, AA Plat, SPG Plat, HGP Diamond, Avis First
Posts: 270
Airlines increase capacity to deal with the increase in leisure travelers, but my understanding is that business travel remains relatively flat during the year (with increases/decreases based upon the domestic or global economy). Certainly in my industry, there's no fall off due to it being summer.
Are there any stats to back up business travel numbers and fluctuations based upon the time of year?
Are there any stats to back up business travel numbers and fluctuations based upon the time of year?
#20
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Just moved to Houston,TX
Programs: UA Platinum, SPG Platinum
Posts: 225
With the fleet wide roll out of Wifi (300 planes by Year end) won't that most likly increase ancillary revenues year over year just by having Wifi for purchase available? Or was the year over year implying Same product sales?
#21
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: DEN
Programs: 2012 Plat-2013 Plat-2014 Silver-2015 GM
Posts: 818
Our current situation is a product of disorganization, lack of planning, no strategy, bad execution coupled with the arrogance that resulted from cramming two totally dissimilar organizations into one gigantic whole that now thinks it rules the airline universe based on size and route coverage alone - hence the 'take it or leave it' attitude many on the TA side of the house felt before it was lathered on customers.
On the same hand, he's got great reason to be a little more comfortable today. The stock is at a 52 week high, plus some. That's his primary job. Keeping the shareholders happy. That fact buys him more time, and he knows it.
Lets see how his Exec VP's run the airline here on out. They are the people on the hot seats for company financial performance.
#22
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: LAX,SNA,CLD,SAN
Programs: UA PP/Marriott Platinum Elite/Hyatt Diamond/Avis Preferred/Hertz Presidential
Posts: 602
I personally think SMI/J is out of touch with what makes a great airline. Most kettles don't care much about boarding groups based upon experience. 2 folks besides me in the seating area, we chatted, I asked the why they are flying UA,sure small sample size, and the response was price, no other factor. The could care less. One said with so many elites on each flight, she has no reservations about being late, fees, dependability, if there was,group 1 wouldn't be 50 people. LOL.
#23
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
#24
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Houston, Texas
Programs: United, Hilton, Avis, & AMEX
Posts: 73
I personally think SMI/J is out of touch with what makes a great airline. Most kettles don't care much about boarding groups based upon experience. 2 folks besides me in the seating area, we chatted, I asked the why they are flying UA,sure small sample size, and the response was price, no other factor. The could care less. One said with so many elites on each flight, she has no reservations about being late, fees, dependability, if there was,group 1 wouldn't be 50 people. LOL.
-Nathan
#25
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: What I write is my opinion alone..don't read into it anything not written.
Posts: 9,685
I believe, because he was referring to YoY growth vs an absolute RASM number. Summer vs summer, given poor performance the previous few months negatively impacted revenue compared to the same seasonal period a year earlier before we were poisoned with Shares and CO theory of not having spare aircraft.
#26
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,172
Isn't Delta taking a similar approach by connecting fares and MQM and FFP accounts to "customize" the entire FFP experience for the customer based on their revenue input? I'm no fan of what I've read about the Delta approach, but at least Delta is not going to the Kettles and selling bits and pieces of Diamond Medallion benefits for a few bucks here and there.
If this is really UA's future approach - why even maintain the Elite tiers of the program? Just sell packaged bundles or a la carte selections of benefits for domestic and international itineraries that cover everything from baggage allowances, IFE, onboard meals, lounge access, upgrades, etc. Everyone is a nobody until they take a $300 ticket and make it $400 with package A, or $600 with an upgrade to F that includes package A and a bigger seat. Fly 10k miles a year or 300K miles, it doesn't matter - it's all about revenue per ticket, not per year.
I wonder if your future meeting with the other executive will yield confirmation of this or something different.
#27
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
Which basically tells the loyal customer, your loyalty means nothing - if you want benefits, buy them at time of sale or check-in.
Isn't Delta taking a similar approach by connecting fares and MQM and FFP accounts to "customize" the entire FFP experience for the customer based on their revenue input? I'm no fan of what I've read about the Delta approach, but at least Delta is not going to the Kettles and selling bits and pieces of Diamond Medallion benefits for a few bucks here and there.
Isn't Delta taking a similar approach by connecting fares and MQM and FFP accounts to "customize" the entire FFP experience for the customer based on their revenue input? I'm no fan of what I've read about the Delta approach, but at least Delta is not going to the Kettles and selling bits and pieces of Diamond Medallion benefits for a few bucks here and there.
I think Delta's approach is smart. Tie benefits to some measure of spend/yield. I've got no problem with that. Encourages the right kind of loyalty.
#28
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Programs: UA 1K, AA PLT, SPG PLT
Posts: 1,612
This was never the mentality of PMCO - quite the contrary, as a slightly smaller carrier, PMCO went out of its way to deliver best in class products and service that continually beat out Delta, AA and United....at least until Larry K was dismissed by a greedy BoD.
Our current situation is a product of disorganization, lack of planning, no strategy, bad execution coupled with the arrogance that resulted from cramming two totally dissimilar organizations into one gigantic whole that now thinks it rules the airline universe based on size and route coverage alone - hence the 'take it or leave it' attitude many on the TA side of the house felt before it was lathered on customers.
Our current situation is a product of disorganization, lack of planning, no strategy, bad execution coupled with the arrogance that resulted from cramming two totally dissimilar organizations into one gigantic whole that now thinks it rules the airline universe based on size and route coverage alone - hence the 'take it or leave it' attitude many on the TA side of the house felt before it was lathered on customers.
I never flew PMCO before the merger was announced. That said, I do remember people having relatively good things to say about the airline and of course the mention of free meals in coach on long flights, just as other airlines started charging for everything...
However, as you mention - it seems like things changed and the only thing I know about PMCO was after the merger was announced and Jeffy Jeff was in charge. I still recall reading threads about things going wrong on trips, people writing in and getting a shrug of the shoulders - exactly my experiences.
And, yes I agree with your analysis about what's going on with the current airline, but as I stated initially...what exactly is UA trying to do to win back both managed and unmanaged customers?
-jeremy
#29
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
What I found most interesting is that on the 4Q call in Jan, UA said their plan to get folks back is to have the sales force go tell accounts about the improved OT performance and the network. Obviously, this strategy in essence gives up on "unmanaged" HVFers who are not reached by the corporate account sales staff.
They seemed to have turned the corner on operations. They're working on the labor agreements, consistent standards, etc. They're moving in the right direction.
The next stage is going to be very interesting. In particular how AA/US impacts the revenue model, how the US management changes AA, and how the bankruptcy changes their cost base.
I'm one of the 'unmanaged' business travelers who has complete control over my own travel, and who achieved GS for the last few years. I've been happier given their consistent schedule and improving on time performance. While I agree the onboard experience leaves much to be desired, that will work itself out, but it also doesn't bother me that much. All airlines service standards are pretty much the same IMH.
The next stage is going to be very interesting. In particular how AA/US impacts the revenue model, how the US management changes AA, and how the bankruptcy changes their cost base.
I'm one of the 'unmanaged' business travelers who has complete control over my own travel, and who achieved GS for the last few years. I've been happier given their consistent schedule and improving on time performance. While I agree the onboard experience leaves much to be desired, that will work itself out, but it also doesn't bother me that much. All airlines service standards are pretty much the same IMH.
FYI, at the same conference, Parker told everyone that the AA/US merger would yield benefits, not by cutting costs, but by increasing revenues. It is about the clearest sign I have heard that they don't intend to cut back on service/elite levels.
I believe the airline's focus is going to be purely operational - reliability (my flight was on time and my baggage arrived too) and service delivery (the staff aren't treating me like crap anymore). I am not getting the warm fuzzies that UA leadership is able to draw a straight line between HVF (including corporate customers) and the loyalty program and its benefits.
Yes we all want a reliable airline, and yes, we would prefer staff don't dump their crap on us, but if all we wanted was a reliable airline with happy staff, we'd all be flying Southwest.
Yes we all want a reliable airline, and yes, we would prefer staff don't dump their crap on us, but if all we wanted was a reliable airline with happy staff, we'd all be flying Southwest.
It will depend on where the PRASM improvements come from - HVF and loyalty customers or Kettles who needlessly dump money into ancillary revenue they have no business spending - $9 on this, $8 on that, $99 on the other.
If the latter provides the jump, then I would guess the data supports unbundling the FFP into bits and pieces that can be sold at POS instead of earned over time.
If the latter provides the jump, then I would guess the data supports unbundling the FFP into bits and pieces that can be sold at POS instead of earned over time.
Airlines increase capacity to deal with the increase in leisure travelers, but my understanding is that business travel remains relatively flat during the year (with increases/decreases based upon the domestic or global economy). Certainly in my industry, there's no fall off due to it being summer.
Are there any stats to back up business travel numbers and fluctuations based upon the time of year?
Are there any stats to back up business travel numbers and fluctuations based upon the time of year?
On the same hand, he's got great reason to be a little more comfortable today. The stock is at a 52 week high, plus some. That's his primary job. Keeping the shareholders happy. That fact buys him more time, and he knows it.
Lets see how his Exec VP's run the airline here on out. They are the people on the hot seats for company financial performance.
#30
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SFO
Programs: UA 1K, HH Gold, Hertz Pres
Posts: 289