Expectations Low for SEA-NRT-BKK Flight on UA and Still Disappointed
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2012
Programs: Hilton Diamond DL Platinum UA 1K, DL Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 500
Expectations Low for SEA-NRT-BKK Flight on UA and Still Disappointed
Today I am making a flight which I do frequently SEA- NRT and on to BKK.
My expectations for service and food are very low so it is hard to not meet those meager expectations. But once again UA was able to do it.
I think 11 or 12 flight attendants most of whom were probably in their 60's and not a smile by any one of them during pre-boarding.
Some rough air after take off so first meal was delayed fo about 90 minutes. I never eat this meal so no difference to me.
Flight is 10 1/2 hours and meal was served about 90 minutes after departure which was fine. Now for the next 4 1/2 hours I never saw a flight attendant with water juice or anything. At the 6 hour mark they delivered a bag of chips. tiny cookie and tiny candy bar. Now having made this flight numerous times I kept waiting for the sandwich but the drink cart came and went and no sandwich.
I figured just another cost cutting measure by UA. At the 9 hour point they delivered a sandwich to everyone. Now you would expect if they are delivering food they might offer something to drink. Sorry no drink carts. Eat it dry or risk a scowl if you ask them to do any work.
30 minutes later they start serving a meal with drink cart following.
They just failed to deliver the sandwich with the snacks 3 hours before and figured oh well , just give to them before the meal. These passengers are so stupid they won't notice the difference.
Like I say my expectations are low and I was in the first row of economy so was able to watch the service in Business which did not appear to be much better.
This new year my tickets to Asia will all be Business Class and UA has no chance of getting my business. When I spend that kind of money I expect service and at least decent food and wine.
I will switch to ANA where the seating is better in business ( no climbing over people to go to lavatory) and the service, food and wine is eons better.
So wake up UA. There is a reason you always have 12-18 empty seats in Business. Your service sucks especially in Economy and not markedly better in BE.
My expectations for service and food are very low so it is hard to not meet those meager expectations. But once again UA was able to do it.
I think 11 or 12 flight attendants most of whom were probably in their 60's and not a smile by any one of them during pre-boarding.
Some rough air after take off so first meal was delayed fo about 90 minutes. I never eat this meal so no difference to me.
Flight is 10 1/2 hours and meal was served about 90 minutes after departure which was fine. Now for the next 4 1/2 hours I never saw a flight attendant with water juice or anything. At the 6 hour mark they delivered a bag of chips. tiny cookie and tiny candy bar. Now having made this flight numerous times I kept waiting for the sandwich but the drink cart came and went and no sandwich.
I figured just another cost cutting measure by UA. At the 9 hour point they delivered a sandwich to everyone. Now you would expect if they are delivering food they might offer something to drink. Sorry no drink carts. Eat it dry or risk a scowl if you ask them to do any work.
30 minutes later they start serving a meal with drink cart following.
They just failed to deliver the sandwich with the snacks 3 hours before and figured oh well , just give to them before the meal. These passengers are so stupid they won't notice the difference.
Like I say my expectations are low and I was in the first row of economy so was able to watch the service in Business which did not appear to be much better.
This new year my tickets to Asia will all be Business Class and UA has no chance of getting my business. When I spend that kind of money I expect service and at least decent food and wine.
I will switch to ANA where the seating is better in business ( no climbing over people to go to lavatory) and the service, food and wine is eons better.
So wake up UA. There is a reason you always have 12-18 empty seats in Business. Your service sucks especially in Economy and not markedly better in BE.
Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Jan 2, 2013 at 3:40 pm Reason: vague, non-specific thread title
#2
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: SIN
Programs: UA 1K MM, SQ PPS, CX Silver, Accor Platinum, Marriott Gold, SPG Silver
Posts: 679
Is this flight still barcoloungers? The route makes sense for me for a lot of reasons, but I just hear the worst feedback because it's apparently where the barcoloungers refuse to die some huge % of the time.
#3
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Programs: UA MM *Gold, Accor Silver
Posts: 1,852
The times I have flown this route recently, it has the new config, and service in BF has been very good.
Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Jan 2, 2013 at 3:27 pm Reason: fix html
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,067
I always thought the snack mid-flight was on request.
They usually have it setup in the galley, and you can always request anything you want to drink.
Same with the snack basket -- it's usually setup after the first meal, and self-service whenever you want something. The menu even makes such a notation.
It seems to be a good balance between not disturbing those who want to sleep, and those who want something.
They usually have it setup in the galley, and you can always request anything you want to drink.
Same with the snack basket -- it's usually setup after the first meal, and self-service whenever you want something. The menu even makes such a notation.
It seems to be a good balance between not disturbing those who want to sleep, and those who want something.
#7
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 328
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 16,900
#10
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 328
#11
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SEA & RDM
Programs: UA - 1MM, DL Diamond, AS MVP75, Marriott Titanium, Hilton Gold
Posts: 8,037
Sorry for the OPs experience...I have never had that happen on this route.
#12
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Programs: MYOB
Posts: 1,289
#13
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 6
I think it would be an exaggeration to say the service was awful, but it definitely seemed like they didn't have their hearts in it.
#14
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2009
Programs: UA 1k
Posts: 1,208
that doesn't sound so bad. especially in Y - you are paying to get there. not for service, food, etc. i'm surprised all food isn't BOB even international. if your biggest complaint is a sandwich served late, it's not so bad. if you want to fly ANA then go ahead. UA probably makes more money off of you anyway because it's a higher priced ticket and they revenue share?
#15
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: PDX/HND
Programs: UA GS 4MM
Posts: 554
i fly sea/nrt often, and bkk a few times a year. nrt-bkk is usually still barcoloungers. in general, i have found the ua nrt/sea crew to be friendly and competent, and the flight is now usually lie-flat. ua cancelled an nrt-sea on us last month and put us on ana. ana is a very competitive product. i believe ana is a j/v partner, so you get full brownie points.