No toilets On UA SFO-SYD Flight in Y

Old Nov 19, 12, 1:51 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Programs: LHSen UA1K VAGold QFSilv HHon Diamond ShangrilaJade Radisson Gold SPG Gold Marriott Gold Hertz Presi
Posts: 986
No toilets On UA SFO-SYD Flight in Y

http://www.australianfrequentflyer.c...tml#post714947
See this post very interesting
http://www.australianfrequentflyer.c...tml#post714947
cbourl is offline  
Old Nov 19, 12, 2:27 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jersey Shore/YYZ
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Gold, National Exec, Hertz PC
Posts: 12,361
Not that interesting, honestly.

The other option would've been to cancel the flight.

I do have an issue with the relatively low compensation offer, if the upgrade is not a GPU.
aacharya is offline  
Old Nov 19, 12, 2:42 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: BGM/ PHL
Programs: US (Silver, *A Silver), AA, Starbucks (Gold)
Posts: 2,242
Reprehensible and unacceptable that they would fly a plane with no toilets. This needs to be reported to DOT...
thomwithanh is offline  
Old Nov 19, 12, 2:45 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
Originally Posted by thomwithanh View Post
Reprehensible and unacceptable that they would fly a plane with no toilets. This needs to be reported to DOT...
RTA. The Y pax were directed to the J lavs.

The lower deck J pax have a beef here.
mre5765 is offline  
Old Nov 19, 12, 2:47 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West Coast, Best Coast
Programs: Flying whoever is most convenient
Posts: 15,432
There is not enough information in the referenced thread to make a judgement. 2nd hand information, no knowledge of whether the issue occurred in flight or prior to departure.

We can all agree that if it occurred prior to departure or very shortly thereafter the plane shouldn't have flown. If it was halfway there, what are the options...turn back or keep going, or divert to HNL or elsewhere and try to get another bird in there. None of the options are great in that scenario, as it's a long way and a lot of water.
PV_Premier is offline  
Old Nov 19, 12, 2:56 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA 1K(until 2021), MM *G for life, Hertz PC, BAEC Silver
Posts: 8,094
Originally Posted by ddrost1 View Post
.... it's a long way and a lot of water.
Which precisely encapsulates the issue!
lhrsfo is offline  
Old Nov 19, 12, 3:10 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Programs: UA Pleb, HH Gold, PWP General Secretary
Posts: 23,142
I have flown LAX-SYD and I know how the Y lavs end up at the end of the flight. This is a fairly serious issue.
colpuck is offline  
Old Nov 19, 12, 3:21 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jersey Shore/YYZ
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Gold, National Exec, Hertz PC
Posts: 12,361
Originally Posted by colpuck View Post
I have flown LAX-SYD and I know how the Y lavs end up at the end of the flight. This is a fairly serious issue.
But this is a thread to another FF forum with scant information, and I mean scant. What's really there of note to comment on?
aacharya is offline  
Old Nov 19, 12, 3:35 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: EWR - Jersey Shore
Programs: UA Gold, *A Gold, HH Dia, Hertz #1 5*
Posts: 630
Originally Posted by ddrost1 View Post
....it's a long way and a lot of water.
Just not enough of the smelly blue water
JerseySlime is offline  
Old Nov 19, 12, 3:37 pm
  #10  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,004
Originally Posted by colpuck View Post
I have flown LAX-SYD and I know how the Y lavs end up at the end of the flight. This is a fairly serious issue.
I have flown LAX-SYD and I know how the J lavs end up at the end of the flight. I can't imagine how the Y ones are at the end of the flight!
Ari is offline  
Old Nov 19, 12, 4:03 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: UA 1K, AA, DL, LH, VX, HA
Posts: 5,713
I find it remarkable that this report comes via another forum reporting on an FB post. How could an SFO-SYD UA flight without toilets escape a direct FTC report filed within minutes of landing?
drewguy is offline  
Old Nov 19, 12, 4:06 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MEL
Programs: VAG
Posts: 1,865
Originally Posted by drewguy View Post
I find it remarkable that this report comes via another forum reporting on an FB post. How could an SFO-SYD UA flight without toilets escape a direct FTC report filed within minutes of landing?
Because for the first few minutes after landing, everybody was busy rushing for the loo at SYD
Jorgen is offline  
Old Nov 19, 12, 4:12 pm
  #13  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,004
If the post is accurate, I'd expect some media mention in the next 48 hours. UA is stingy with compensation right now, so a report of an offer of compensation does make it likely that UA screwed up.
Ari is offline  
Old Nov 19, 12, 4:18 pm
  #14  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 85,311
Does anyone know the number of passengers and toilets in each cabin class in this aircraft. So few toilets for so many passengers on a long flight sounds like a health issue to me. I would think that some toilet ratio is required.

However, if the problem arose well after takeoff, I can understand the decision not to return or divert. If UA knew before boarding, I'm surprised that they could operate the flight this way. I wonder whether the lack of toilets was announced in the gate area, as I've seen happen--for example on US--when it is know in advance that there will be fewer than the usual number of operable toilets.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Nov 19, 12, 5:06 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SFO
Programs: UA-GS 4M, Hilton Diamond , Marriott Platinum
Posts: 76
Originally Posted by mre5765 View Post
RTA. The Y pax were directed to the J lavs.

The lower deck J pax have a beef here.
I was on the Friday night flight SFO-SYD.

BF users who stood to be the most inconvenienced were in rows 9-10, as Y customers would need to walk by to go to the BF loo. and I just happened to be in row 9 (aisle).

The problem arose well after takeoff. I started noticing things about 3.5 hours before landing. The crew was good at trying to keep things organized, and would direct traffic in and out of BF and try to keep the line that had been increasing behind the Y curtain moving. Sometimes they would even direct some PAX to the front loos as well, but tried to keep the traffic reasonable.

Actually, I think the crew did very well given the circumstances and the fact that there was not much they managed to do while in flight. Of course it doesn't compensate for the fact that this was massively inconvenient for Y customers, but given the fact that things happened in the second half of the flight it appears they did the best they could.

My personal opinion of course... and I have no idea whether this is just an accident, or something good maintenance could have prevented.

Upon landing there was an "appreciation" link and email in my mailbox from UA: I liked that.

Fly happy.
totorn is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread