![]() |
Conversion of sCO 737 to include E+?
There is probably a website or wiki or something that would tell me this but I don't know where it would be. How far along is the conversion of the longer range 737 (transcon) to include full E+?
I have been avoiding sCO planes completely but have a couple of flights to WAS coming up and they seem to mostly be on 737s now. I'd rather cram myself into a CRJ to DEN and connect to an Airbus than suffer the old CO Y for 5+ hours. |
Originally Posted by abmj-jr
(Post 19536314)
There is probably a website or wiki or something that would tell me this but I don't know where it would be.
|
Thanks. :)
|
I avoid flying PMCO 737s as well for the same reason. The CRJ-700s are more spacious and the seats more comfortable in Economy Plus than the PMCO 737s. I hope they also replace the seats on PMCO 737s in coach which are old and extremely uncomfortable in addition to adding E+.
|
Originally Posted by Pi7473000
(Post 19537023)
I avoid flying PMCO 737s as well for the same reason. The CRJ-700s are more spacious and the seats more comfortable in Economy Plus than the PMCO 737s. I hope they also replace the seats on PMCO 737s in coach which are old and extremely uncomfortable in addition to adding E+.
It's worth pointing out that the 737s have some of the roomiest E+ in the whole fleet. |
Originally Posted by star_world
(Post 19537347)
Since the majority of the sCO aircraft are far from "old" (almost all are much newer than the entire A319/320 fleet) then it is clear that their seats are not "old". I've never heard anyone cite a preference for a CR7 compared with a relatively new 737 - that's a first for me ;)
I don't understand why, but I've heard this a few times. |
Originally Posted by FlyerChrisK
(Post 19537508)
The interior design of the PMCO fleet doesn't inspire feelings of youth in most people.
I don't understand why, but I've heard this a few times. |
Originally Posted by star_world
(Post 19537524)
- the only "modern" interiors to be found across all of UA, US, AA, DL, AS and WN are in the handful of aircraft with the new Boeing Sky Interior - of which UA has the most ;)
|
There are 20 aircraft in the fleet with Boeing Sky Interior
2 B787-8 Dreamliner's 14 B737-900ERs 4 B737-800s. |
Originally Posted by Pi7473000
(Post 19537023)
I avoid flying PMCO 737s as well for the same reason. The CRJ-700s are more spacious and the seats more comfortable in Economy Plus than the PMCO 737s. I hope they also replace the seats on PMCO 737s in coach which are old and extremely uncomfortable in addition to adding E+.
|
Conversion of sCO 737 to include E+?
Sky interiors can't increase seat width.
If possible I try for A3xx... |
Originally Posted by star_world
(Post 19537524)
True - the same could be said about all of the fleets operated by legacy US carriers - the only "modern" interiors to be found across all of UA, US, AA, DL, AS and WN are in the handful of aircraft with the new Boeing Sky Interior - of which UA has the most ;)
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
(Post 19538261)
There are 20 aircraft in the fleet with Boeing Sky Interior
2 B787-8 Dreamliner's 14 B737-900ERs 4 B737-800s. |
Originally Posted by elitetraveler
(Post 19538844)
Wow talk about stumping for the home team - 20 out of 700 -- a great reason to fly UA :rolleyes:
2 B787-8 Dreamliners 22 B77-200s 10 B767-400s 13 B757-300s 41 B757-200s 45 B737-900/900ERs 88 B737-800s 32 B737-700s 11 B737-500s |
Originally Posted by star_world
(Post 19537347)
Since the majority of the sCO aircraft are far from "old" (almost all are much newer than the entire A319/320 fleet) then it is clear that their seats are not "old". I've never heard anyone cite a preference for a CR7 compared with a relatively new 737 - that's a first for me ;)
It's worth pointing out that the 737s have some of the roomiest E+ in the whole fleet. |
Can we please keep this t:confused: a discussion of aircraft with E+?
Thanks, Xyzzy UA forum moderator |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:03 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.