The decline of UA at SFO
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: london, uk
Posts: 120
The decline of UA at SFO
I used to find it a pleasure to fly in and out of SFO on United as a 1K. Now, it's an ordeal. The merged airline has taken away virtually all special privileges for 1K, so there are almost never upgradable seats on transcons out of SFO, and even Economy Plus seats are hard to come by. Today flew SFO to IAD, with a waiting list of 95 for upgrades, with 1Ks in the middle of it. And that's very typical now. The "Premier Access" security line at SFO -- all but Global Services under the new set up -- often takes 30 minutes or more, which means your chances of missing a flight are high. I cannot understand why American Airlines doesn't work harder to poach some of this traffic, since the Bay Area is pretty high revenue. I know SFO and IAD aren't AA hubs, still they could be very competitive on that route, which is monopolized by UA (with nominal competition from Virgin). AA flies IAD to LAX, and LAX is a pretty minor AA hub.
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Benicia, California, USA
Programs: AA PLT,AS,UA PP,J6,FB,EY,LH,SQ,HH Dmd,Hyatt Glbl,Marriott Plat,IHG Plat,Accor Gold
Posts: 10,820
Well, AA has had a great status match offer going to draw away UA elites, and at the start of this year had a DEQM bonus going for travel from California to to ORD and DFW.
While I also would like it if AA had non-stop SFO-IAD, the absence of that option is ameliorated significantly by being able to connect to DCA, which saves time on the arriving and departing in the DC area. Factor in the shorter AA security lines SFO, the far greater upgrade chances for AA elites, the frequent UA delays and cancellations, and a nicer AA terminal and lounge, and I'm quite fine using AA to fly to the DC area.
While I also would like it if AA had non-stop SFO-IAD, the absence of that option is ameliorated significantly by being able to connect to DCA, which saves time on the arriving and departing in the DC area. Factor in the shorter AA security lines SFO, the far greater upgrade chances for AA elites, the frequent UA delays and cancellations, and a nicer AA terminal and lounge, and I'm quite fine using AA to fly to the DC area.
#3
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: STL/SFO
Programs: UAL 1P
Posts: 53
Yep. I'm a mere 1P so I don't expect upgrades in SFO. However, the premier lines at SFO are absolutely terrible. I hope they do something to shuffle the credit card holders elsewhere because it eliminates one of the most useful benefits of having elite status -- short lines.
I saw something about credit card holders getting different boarding passes that disallow use in elite security lines, but I've no idea if this is widespread or even enforced. SFO could also improve signage and up front line checking as often the premier security line is full of regular passengers thinking its the normal security line.
I saw something about credit card holders getting different boarding passes that disallow use in elite security lines, but I've no idea if this is widespread or even enforced. SFO could also improve signage and up front line checking as often the premier security line is full of regular passengers thinking its the normal security line.
#5
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SFO
Programs: DL DM/MM; UA Premier 1K; AA EXP; ICH Plat Ambassador
Posts: 1,565
I used to find it a pleasure to fly in and out of SFO on United as a 1K. Now, it's an ordeal. The merged airline has taken away virtually all special privileges for 1K, so there are almost never upgradable seats on transcons out of SFO, and even Economy Plus seats are hard to come by. Today flew SFO to IAD, with a waiting list of 95 for upgrades, with 1Ks in the middle of it. And that's very typical now. The "Premier Access" security line at SFO -- all but Global Services under the new set up -- often takes 30 minutes or more, which means your chances of missing a flight are high. I cannot understand why American Airlines doesn't work harder to poach some of this traffic, since the Bay Area is pretty high revenue. I know SFO and IAD aren't AA hubs, still they could be very competitive on that route, which is monopolized by UA (with nominal competition from Virgin). AA flies IAD to LAX, and LAX is a pretty minor AA hub.
#6
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: london, uk
Posts: 120
#7
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DEN
Programs: UA1K
Posts: 4,044
depending on when you are departing ex SFO, when the lines are long i just make the quick walk up to the international terminal and go through there. always quicker for me.
as for upgrades, well...you can't book flights expecting a free upgrade. especially on SFO-IAD.
as for upgrades, well...you can't book flights expecting a free upgrade. especially on SFO-IAD.
#8
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NCL
Programs: UA 1MM/*G. DL Gold for one more year.
Posts: 5,305
Indeed not, but it certainly wasn't as bad in the days of 500-milers when the upgrade lists contained only those who were willing to "pay" by applying instruments.
#9
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SFO
Programs: DL DM/MM; UA Premier 1K; AA EXP; ICH Plat Ambassador
Posts: 1,565
#10
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 57,579
Not true. I fly IAD-SFO 4-6 times a year, and before 2011, I enjoyed a healthy upgrade percentage - 75%. What has changed the percentage downward are two factors - pmUA reducing overall fleet capacity, and the pulling of widebodies off this route. While the former isn't a merger-driven cause, the latter is.
#11
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 537
Hopefully precheck helps this.
#12
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SFO
Programs: DL DM/MM; UA Premier 1K; AA EXP; ICH Plat Ambassador
Posts: 1,565
Not true. I fly IAD-SFO 4-6 times a year, and before 2011, I enjoyed a healthy upgrade percentage - 75%. What has changed the percentage downward are two factors - pmUA reducing overall fleet capacity, and the pulling of widebodies off this route. While the former isn't a merger-driven cause, the latter is.
#13
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NorCal
Programs: MP Ag, former 1K
Posts: 479
Yep. I'm a mere 1P so I don't expect upgrades in SFO. However, the premier lines at SFO are absolutely terrible. I hope they do something to shuffle the credit card holders elsewhere because it eliminates one of the most useful benefits of having elite status -- short lines.
There were supposed to be 2 agents per line to check ID's, but one of the desks for the elite line was not occupied, so only 1 agent was checking ID's for the elite line, but 2 agents were checking ID's for the non-elite line. This set up might work well if the ratio of elites to non-elites were much less than 33%, but since this was SFO, it was basically close to 50%, and we were all rather unhappy.
Granted, I had extra time so the delay didn't impact my schedule in a real way, but having the idiot traffic manager enforcing the "elites in the elite line" thing didn't help United that day. Sometimes it's just the little things that doesn't cost much (any) money that will hurt or help United's image.
#14
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,844
Your stats are definitely on the 3 sigma unluck end. While I agree IAD-SFO is a tough upgrade route, the smaller planes have definitively made it tougher -- a regional upgrade candidate.