Live 787 Unveiling
#47
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
What I can't believe is that JAL went with 42J/144Y (8 across) for a total of just 186 seats. That just goes against every other airline's quest for higher seating density.
#48
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,471
Video tour of 787 interior
#49
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: DL Diamond, UA 1K MM, SPG Plat For Life, Marriott Plat, Nexus/GlobalEntry
Posts: 9,198
#51
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LAX
Programs: UA Silver, AA, WN, DL
Posts: 4,091
I know there was no plan for new business seats, but when I saw the BF seats, I just felt like they could've done something different. Maybe I'm spoiled from flying in C before, but its the same seat and there's nothing new or innovative to go along with such a new plane.
#52
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,167
219 total seats. Yuck. My guess is that AA outdoes UA with innovative 10 across seats on its 787s in a few years.
What I can't believe is that JAL went with 42J/144Y (8 across) for a total of just 186 seats. That just goes against every other airline's quest for higher seating density.
What I can't believe is that JAL went with 42J/144Y (8 across) for a total of just 186 seats. That just goes against every other airline's quest for higher seating density.
#54
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Programs: UA Pleb, HH Gold, PWP General Secretary
Posts: 23,199
#55
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,167
#56
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
I can starve myself and narrow my waist and hips, but how do I shrink my width at my shoulders? That's where my issue has always been in 3 across economy seating. That's why I value 2-5-2; the pairs are much more comfortable for me.
#57
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Programs: UA Pleb, HH Gold, PWP General Secretary
Posts: 23,199
#58
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 60,173
#59
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SFO/JFK/MGA
Programs: UA 1P MM, AA-PP, AS, DL, HH G, SPG Gold, TA nada
Posts: 2,043
#60
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MEL
Programs: VAG
Posts: 1,865
Good points:
1. 36" seat pitch in Y+ is nice, so at least they're not skimping on that.
Bad points:
1. Ugh, nine-abreast, as everyone has already said. The 17" seat width is the same as the 747 so it's nothing new, but those aisles are narrower. On the upside an extra 2" of seat pitch vs the 747 will probably make Y+ an improvement, especially if you can manage to get an empty seat next to you.
2. Those screens look pretty small by today's standards.
3. Total failure of imagination and design. Why would you buy the fanciest highest-tech shiniest plane in the world and fill it with those early-90s blue-on-blue check seats? Why not buy Buckingham Palace and fill it with pictures of dogs playing poker?
1. 36" seat pitch in Y+ is nice, so at least they're not skimping on that.
Bad points:
1. Ugh, nine-abreast, as everyone has already said. The 17" seat width is the same as the 747 so it's nothing new, but those aisles are narrower. On the upside an extra 2" of seat pitch vs the 747 will probably make Y+ an improvement, especially if you can manage to get an empty seat next to you.
2. Those screens look pretty small by today's standards.
3. Total failure of imagination and design. Why would you buy the fanciest highest-tech shiniest plane in the world and fill it with those early-90s blue-on-blue check seats? Why not buy Buckingham Palace and fill it with pictures of dogs playing poker?