Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Live 787 Unveiling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2012, 3:56 pm
  #46  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 60,173
Live 787 Unveiling

Claustrophobic

9 across <shudder>
uastarflyer is online now  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 4:06 pm
  #47  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by BayAreaPilot
I don't have to see inside to know that 9 seats per row is worse than 8 seats per row.
219 total seats. Yuck. My guess is that AA outdoes UA with innovative 10 across seats on its 787s in a few years.

What I can't believe is that JAL went with 42J/144Y (8 across) for a total of just 186 seats. That just goes against every other airline's quest for higher seating density.
FWAAA is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 4:13 pm
  #48  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: EWR, BDL
Posts: 4,471
Video tour of 787 interior

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdRkuHeJ7oI

Here's a video of the interior of the UA 787.
JOSECONLSCREW28 is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 4:24 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: DL Diamond, UA 1K MM, SPG Plat For Life, Marriott Plat, Nexus/GlobalEntry
Posts: 9,198
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdRkuHeJ7oI

Here's a video of the interior of the UA 787.
Great video thanks! BF looks just like any other PMCO BF cabin..works for me.
SEA1K4EVR is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 4:32 pm
  #50  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Programs: UA Pleb, HH Gold, PWP General Secretary
Posts: 23,199
How much narrower is the 787 compared to the 777?
colpuck is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 4:33 pm
  #51  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LAX
Programs: UA Silver, AA, WN, DL
Posts: 4,091
I know there was no plan for new business seats, but when I saw the BF seats, I just felt like they could've done something different. Maybe I'm spoiled from flying in C before, but its the same seat and there's nothing new or innovative to go along with such a new plane.
luv2ctheworld is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 4:34 pm
  #52  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,167
Originally Posted by FWAAA
219 total seats. Yuck. My guess is that AA outdoes UA with innovative 10 across seats on its 787s in a few years.

What I can't believe is that JAL went with 42J/144Y (8 across) for a total of just 186 seats. That just goes against every other airline's quest for higher seating density.
And only 158 for NH! (46/112)
UA-NYC is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 4:36 pm
  #53  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by colpuck
How much narrower is the 787 compared to the 777?
Someone above posted that the 787 interior is 16 inches narrower than the 777.
FWAAA is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 4:45 pm
  #54  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Programs: UA Pleb, HH Gold, PWP General Secretary
Posts: 23,199
Originally Posted by FWAAA
Someone above posted that the 787 interior is 16 inches narrower than the 777.
so that's about 1.5in per Y seat and 2.5 per BF seat. I guess it will encourage us americans to slim down.
colpuck is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 4:54 pm
  #55  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,167
Originally Posted by colpuck
so that's about 1.5in per Y seat and 2.5 per BF seat. I guess it will encourage us americans to slim down.
Or, to book elsewhere, as many of us have our choice of carriers as Mr. $misek tells us
UA-NYC is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 4:56 pm
  #56  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by colpuck
so that's about 1.5in per Y seat and 2.5 per BF seat. I guess it will encourage us americans to slim down.
I can starve myself and narrow my waist and hips, but how do I shrink my width at my shoulders? That's where my issue has always been in 3 across economy seating. That's why I value 2-5-2; the pairs are much more comfortable for me.
FWAAA is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 5:01 pm
  #57  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Programs: UA Pleb, HH Gold, PWP General Secretary
Posts: 23,199
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
Or, to book elsewhere, as many of us have our choice of carriers as Mr. $misek tells us
It's rare when we agree. I am only booking the 787 if I can clear directly into BF or it's a short domestic trip.
colpuck is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 5:06 pm
  #58  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 60,173
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
Originally Posted by colpuck
so that's about 1.5in per Y seat and 2.5 per BF seat. I guess it will encourage us americans to slim down.
Or, to book elsewhere, as many of us have our choice of carriers as Mr. $misek tells us
Or book the 777 if shackled to UA
uastarflyer is online now  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 5:35 pm
  #59  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SFO/JFK/MGA
Programs: UA 1P MM, AA-PP, AS, DL, HH G, SPG Gold, TA nada
Posts: 2,043
Originally Posted by JOSECONLSCREW28
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdRkuHeJ7oI

Here's a video of the interior of the UA 787.
Thanks JOSE! That video answers our question about the bulkheads between Y & C. It goes all the way to the floor.
zoegksf is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 5:41 pm
  #60  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MEL
Programs: VAG
Posts: 1,865
Good points:

1. 36" seat pitch in Y+ is nice, so at least they're not skimping on that.

Bad points:

1. Ugh, nine-abreast, as everyone has already said. The 17" seat width is the same as the 747 so it's nothing new, but those aisles are narrower. On the upside an extra 2" of seat pitch vs the 747 will probably make Y+ an improvement, especially if you can manage to get an empty seat next to you.

2. Those screens look pretty small by today's standards.

3. Total failure of imagination and design. Why would you buy the fanciest highest-tech shiniest plane in the world and fill it with those early-90s blue-on-blue check seats? Why not buy Buckingham Palace and fill it with pictures of dogs playing poker?
Jorgen is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.