Community
Wiki Posts
Search

What are the rules for non-rev upgrades?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 27, 2016, 12:47 pm
  #136  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ewa Beach, Hawaii
Posts: 10,909
Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
In this thread we are discussing employee travel benefits, not contract benefits. Positive Space / company sponsored travel is an additional subject.

As for employee travel benefits for GF, it is after all paid ($$$ or award) customers have been accommodated and all supported upgrade requests have also been accommodated. Then the employee benefit can kick in -- at times leading to a number of employees (and family) in GF. However it also appears from reports on FT it is common that employees (and family) end up in economy with their travel benefits.
And travel benefits are part of the contract, not sure what your point is.
Baze is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2016, 2:00 pm
  #137  
Moderator: United Airlines
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,849
Originally Posted by Baze
And travel benefits are part of the contract, not sure what your point is.
Actually I don't believe that is completely correct. But we will need an employee to better explain what benefits exist outside their contracts.
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2016, 2:20 pm
  #138  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: ORD
Programs: Marriott Titanium Elite, UA Silver, AA Gold
Posts: 494
Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
Actually I don't believe that is completely correct. But we will need an employee to better explain what benefits exist outside their contracts.
Yes and no. Its not a right of employment.
SPLITTERZ is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2016, 2:44 pm
  #139  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Denver
Posts: 451
Originally Posted by Baze
And travel benefits are part of the contract, not sure what your point is.
Other then crew based dead heading rights and positive space business travel, actual non-rev travel benefits aren't apart of the collective bargaining agreement for any work group. At least that I'm aware of. It's a benefit afforded to the employees by the company. That said, if it weren't for the travel benefits, I feel as though it would certainly force the company to make the jobs more attractive via other areas. For instance, increased pay. And for the company, it's certainly preferable to give employees travel benefits which cost very little for them, versus having to pay everyone more. Which could very well lead to higher ticket prices.
DENviaLAX is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2016, 10:20 pm
  #140  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: FL 290 through FL390
Posts: 1,687
Originally Posted by DENviaLAX
Originally Posted by Baze
And travel benefits are part of the contract, not sure what your point is.
Other then crew based dead heading rights and positive space business travel, actual non-rev travel benefits aren't apart of the collective bargaining agreement for any work group. At least that I'm aware of. It's a benefit afforded to the employees by the company. That said, if it weren't for the travel benefits, I feel as though it would certainly force the company to make the jobs more attractive via other areas. For instance, increased pay. And for the company, it's certainly preferable to give employees travel benefits which cost very little for them, versus having to pay everyone more. Which could very well lead to higher ticket prices.
Yes, that was my point upthread. The company could have never made any travel bennies available but who'd apply for a job here without them? Considering that there are very few employees that get as much value from pass riding as is potentially available, and it costs next to nothing to make an otherwise empty seat available to an employee (I'm disregarding the opportunity cost to the company in the realm of revenue passengers) it would not be cost effective to compensate the employees any other way.

For the record, I think UDU or any upgrading is a bad business move, made necessary because there's always going to be one carrier that does it for a day's worth of market share, only to be put back in the same order in the stack when all the others do it also. Now, the market share is the same as before but they've all given something away.

Here's a fairly typical scenario that my wife and I experienced recently: Day one, spend the day at the airport trying to go from XXX to YYY. No luck. Try again the next day, get on the flight in coach-, visit Ma & Pa for a couple days, then non-rev home, wife is the second to last person in the cabin, I'm in the cockpit jumpseat with the Cap, FO, and another jumpseater who's partner got the last seat on the plane. Lots ad non-revs experiencing what I'd experienced a couple days before (quality airport time).

Pass riding is a crap shoot, we accept that. Like I mentioned earlier, the last time I rode in FC was a year and a half ago when I bought two seats with MP miles, SYD to LAX. That, thanks to a FTer who knows the system better than I ever will, and PM'd me with the hot tip on the deal.

FAB

Originally Posted by bmwe92fan
Originally Posted by freshairborne
Every airline that has travel benefits for their employees does it because it's cheaper than not, and paying us more instead. I learned that stuff in Econ 101.

FAB
This simply isn't true - Singapore airlines and Emirates don't don't anything like UA does - not even close. Perhaps you meant every US based airline.....
Yes, that's what I meant. I have zero experience nor knowledge with non-US carriers. Thank you for making that point.

FAB

Last edited by WineCountryUA; Mar 27, 2016 at 10:40 pm Reason: merging consecutive posts by same member and repaired quotes
freshairborne is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.