Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

What!!! Complimentary Upgrades only clear for YBM fares within the window?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

What!!! Complimentary Upgrades only clear for YBM fares within the window?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 13, 2012, 6:27 am
  #46  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: United Premier 1K 1MM; AA Plat Pro; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott Platinum; Avis President's Club
Posts: 2,528
ANYONE that is having these upgrade issues within their upgrade timeframe when R>0 needs to PM UAInsider so they can look into the matter. There are still issues with system integration and they need to know about these problems.
mh3265a is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2012, 6:57 am
  #47  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DEN
Programs: UA MM Plat; AA MM Gold; HHonors Diamond
Posts: 15,866
Originally Posted by mh3265a
ANYONE that is having these upgrade issues within their upgrade timeframe when R>0 needs to PM UAInsider so they can look into the matter. There are still issues with system integration and they need to know about these problems.
From my reading of the various upgrade-related threads over the last week, I have concluded that there are at least two possibilities for upgrades not clearing within one's window when R/RN>0:


1)
Originally Posted by CollegeFlyer
Are you sure about this? A UA spokesperson said in a conversation at a recent DO, that on certain flights or in certain markets, EUA was programmed not to deplete the entire R/RN inventory when it ran, especially during the first few "sweeps." Which would mean there is a separate, invisible fare bucket (or a glass-ceiling limit) on EUAs (now CPUs).
2) Out-of-sync (or whatever) reservations that stop the CPU process in its tracks on some (many?) flights, as described by Shannon (UA Insider). She said that integration has vastly increased the number of such reservations in the system.

Once this all gets sorted, it will be interesting to see whether the "problem" essentially disappears. It was my experience pre-integration that, in general, flights with RN (or its equivalent at the time) at sweep time always had that inventory reduced. Knocking wood...
Bonehead is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2012, 1:24 pm
  #48  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: BOI (formerly ORD)
Programs: UA 1K 1.4MM; AA PLT 2.5MM; Hilton Diamond; Starwood Gold; Hyatt Platinum; Amex MR; Chase UR, et al
Posts: 465
Originally Posted by avidflyer
It is a difference but I was at DL for a long time and they had a similar rule. The reality is YB fares are so expensive they are not going to do a lot to 1K/GS UG %'s. Yes they will happen but there are as few of those fares as people paying discount FC. A relatively small group.
I'd be willing to guess that on your average A319 ORD-SFO there are 2-4 people on paid F and as many as 5 on B/Y fares, if for no other reason than the flights are full and that's how IM works. That accounts for all of the F seats, without considering any GM or lower elites that may be using an instrument. Again, not taking a position on whether it is good or bad; just different.

Originally Posted by Red_Rob
...1K's should have even better in the new UA...
I fail to see how this could possibly be true. Theoretically, there are a greater number of potential passengers ahead of a 1K traveling on an H fare on the upgrade list than before March 3. I am of the strong opinion that the empirical data will prove out the theory. Again, again, not taking a position on whether it is good or bad, but it is different from before.
000123UA is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2012, 2:16 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA - 1k, Hilton - Diamond, Hertz - 5 Star Gold
Posts: 57
Originally Posted by Red_Rob
and 1K's should have even better in the new UA. At the end of the day the overall upgrade % will tell the tale.
I'd love to understand why you think this. I do not see 1 change that is in a positive direction from a 1k perspective.
thach1ef is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2012, 2:22 pm
  #50  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ORD / DUB / LHR
Programs: UA 1K MM; BA Silver; Marriott Plat
Posts: 8,243
Originally Posted by thach1ef
I'd love to understand why you think this. I do not see 1 change that is in a positive direction from a 1k perspective.
Free changes approx. +/- 24 hours around your original flight is a major one.
star_world is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2012, 2:28 pm
  #51  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NYC
Programs: Continental Plat (RIP); United 1K MM; Starwood Plat; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 114
Lightbulb Certification!

It really does boggle the mind that most of us know the rules and nuances to the elite program better than most of the United employees!

I think all the agents should be given an exam every now and then to make sure they are up to speed with the information. Granted, it's not a job that requires certification like some professional occupations, but it's an important element of the airline business. It's a shame that we have to sometimes call two or three agents to get one that is familiar and knowledgeable. Maybe they could promote an incentive of sorts to agents who pass with flying colors.

And maybe we could come up with the questions in a quiz format! I'm sure there are hundreds, if not thousands, of examples that would make for excellent testing material found here on this forum...
cooltraveler is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2012, 4:59 pm
  #52  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: TPA
Programs: UA 1PP MM
Posts: 328
Originally Posted by LeviFlight
Credit cards. UA is not focused on
flyers it's focused on Chase spenders.
Nope, unless your putting a ton of business $$$ it still isn't enough miles a year to blow on mileage upgrades.
mnmme is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2012, 5:28 pm
  #53  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA - 1k, Hilton - Diamond, Hertz - 5 Star Gold
Posts: 57
Originally Posted by star_world
Free changes approx. +/- 24 hours around your original flight is a major one.
I'm not sure what you are trying to say. That sentence doesn't make sense to me.
thach1ef is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2012, 5:30 pm
  #54  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SFO and OAK
Programs: FAF, Hyatt <>, SPG PLT
Posts: 2,240
Originally Posted by thach1ef
I'm not sure what you are trying to say. That sentence doesn't make sense to me.
I think it refers to the ability to confirm a flight change onto another flight at 24 hours prior to departure. PMUA was much shorter (4 hours I think)
Beerman92 is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2012, 5:32 pm
  #55  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Programs: UA - 1k, Hilton - Diamond, Hertz - 5 Star Gold
Posts: 57
Originally Posted by Beerman92
I think it refers to the ability to confirm a flight change onto another flight at 24 hours prior to departure. PMUA was much shorter (4 hours I think)
Ah I see. Well if that's what he was referring too, I'd hardly call that a major change. That change is a special circumstance change. There have been tons of negative changes that effect every single flight you take.
thach1ef is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2012, 5:52 pm
  #56  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SFO and OAK
Programs: FAF, Hyatt <>, SPG PLT
Posts: 2,240
Originally Posted by thach1ef
Ah I see. Well if that's what he was referring too, I'd hardly call that a major change. That change is a special circumstance change. There have been tons of negative changes that effect every single flight you take.
I'm not trying to argue semantics but I'd characterize it that there have been a fair number of changes that may or may not cause a ton of turmoil with any given itinerary or ticket. So some are having pretty bad experiences while some are having few, if any problems.

I'm sure that means nothing to a pax who is going through the bad experiences. They don't care that 80% (pick a number from 0 to 100 I don't care) of pax have few to no problems but they are in the 20% having problems.
Beerman92 is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2012, 8:53 pm
  #57  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Programs: United Premier 1K 1MM; AA Plat Pro; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott Platinum; Avis President's Club
Posts: 2,528
Originally Posted by Bonehead
From my reading of the various upgrade-related threads over the last week, I have concluded that there are at least two possibilities for upgrades not clearing within one's window when R/RN>0:


1)

2) Out-of-sync (or whatever) reservations that stop the CPU process in its tracks on some (many?) flights, as described by Shannon (UA Insider). She said that integration has vastly increased the number of such reservations in the system.

Once this all gets sorted, it will be interesting to see whether the "problem" essentially disappears. It was my experience pre-integration that, in general, flights with RN (or its equivalent at the time) at sweep time always had that inventory reduced. Knocking wood...
Fair enough but the only to prove one or both of these theories is to PM UAInsider with specific examples so they can continue to try and address this matter
mh3265a is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2012, 9:23 pm
  #58  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,222
Originally Posted by mh3265a
Fair enough but the only to prove one or both of these theories is to PM UAInsider with specific examples so they can continue to try and address this matter
There's no reason to PM them on #1. They've already stated that the CPU process does not map to the R/RN bucket. In other words, the availability of R/RN does not ensure that any CPUs will clear, even when the "sweep" runs.

While R/RN may give an indication of CPU availability, it does not guarantee it.
ijgordon is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2012, 9:46 pm
  #59  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: SoCal to the rest of the world...
Programs: AA EXP with lots of BA. UA 2MM Lifetime Plat - No longer chase hotel loyalty
Posts: 6,698
I Documented Instant CONFIRMED Y/B/M Upgrades last week

This was in another thread I posted to:
THESE DO NOT USE R INVENTORY - PEOPLE STOP SPREADING FALSE INFO!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I just did a ticket from SNA-EWR-SNA that was M fare and instant upgrade.

My ticket was issued by our corporate travel agent so even though not united.com originated upgrades online were available

You have to click on the Instant Upgrade link BELOW the itin ; NOT try to click Upgrades on the Res Tools bar as that will apply other instruments/miles/money - WARNING: INSTANT UPGRADES DO NOT SEEM TO BE AUTOMATIC!!! YOU MUST GO INTO THE RECORD AND CLICK THE INSTANT UPGRADE LINK

What I see is this:

PN is needed for B/M Instant upgrades
JN for Y Instant upgrades

PN seems to match ZN which is standard First/Biz Awards - This also seem to match regular farecodes A and P

JN seems to match regular seat availability in F - so a Y instant farecode upgrade means if a rev seat is available it's yours (so it seems)

On my flight I saw the following on Rev fares/regular farecodes:
F5, A3, P3

On Award codes I saw:
PN3, ZN3, JN5

Upon confirming the upgrade on the link, A, P, PN and ZN all went down to 2

On these flights R and RN were zero'd out which are used for GPU (SWU), RPU (CR-1) and miles (RN for Elites) ; so if I used an instrument it would have gone to a waitlist

Hope this sheds some light - BTW Expertflyer.com shows all new combined UA inventory perfectly
NickP 1K is offline  
Old Mar 13, 2012, 10:02 pm
  #60  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IAH
Programs: UA/CO-GS/PPlat,AA-Gold,SPG-Plat,Hilton-Diamond,Marriott-Plat,Hertz-Pres_Circe
Posts: 824
Originally Posted by 000123UA


I fail to see how this could possibly be true. Theoretically, there are a greater number of potential passengers ahead of a 1K traveling on an H fare on the upgrade list than before March 3. I am of the strong opinion that the empirical data will prove out the theory. Again, again, not taking a position on whether it is good or bad, but it is different from before.
Originally Posted by thach1ef
I'd love to understand why you think this. I do not see 1 change that is in a positive direction from a 1k perspective.
I stated that
A) PMCO upgrade rates were good for Plats
B) New UA should be better (than PMCO Plats)
I was NOT comparing overall to PMUA.

Basically the rules are the same as PMCO, but as a new 1K you rank ahead of many legacy Plats (75-99K). Given similar rules, and a more exclusive status, upgrades should be better (than PMCO, which I mentioned were pretty good).

The likely big losers for upgrades are PMCO fliers from 75-99K. Winners are PMUA fliers from 75-99K and PMCO fliers at 100K plus.

If you have data showing low upgrade rates (relatively) for PMCO Plats historically, that would obviously negatively impact my hypothesis. My upgrade rates for a few years as a PMCO Plat (before I made Pres Plat) were around 85%. With most missed upgrades in Dec-Feb (should be Decc-Jan going forward) when elites were inflated before some fell off the rolls.
Red_Rob is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.