Community
Wiki Posts
Search

How many are thinking of jumping ship?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 13, 2011, 12:22 am
  #91  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
Originally Posted by AAExPlat
Yep. The ones that are at 75% or higher are the Plats/1ks who fly on expensive/refundable fares.
Why would you expect anything different than this?
LarkSFO is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2011, 12:41 am
  #92  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: PHX and TUS
Programs: UA 1K SPG Plat HHonors Diamond
Posts: 253
Originally Posted by AAExPlat
Yep. The ones that are at 75% or higher are the Plats/1ks who fly on expensive/refundable fares. My upgrade percentage in the last half of 2010 was a measly 35%, and even on cheap fares that is ludicrously low.

I do have 8 segments coming up though, so I guess I might get a glimpse of whether things have changed in the last 6-12 months.
although many factors go into upgrades....I'm at 90%+...I've missed like 3 upgrades this year. All my fares are H or Y...I've done two mileage runs also that were elite heavy and still cleared all legs on a G fare lol...
qoodoo is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2011, 12:49 am
  #93  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SNA and BNA depending on work and time of year
Programs: UA Silver/ AA EXP/Hyatt Globalist/Marriott Lifetime Titanium/Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,189
Originally Posted by ryerflyer
I wouldn’t get too excited about AA unless you’re in F a lot. DL had to move me to an AA flight EWR-DFW a few weeks ago. When I checked in at the ticket counter, I was assigned a middle seat as the agent said nothing else was left. At the gate, 10 minutes later, the agent said there were several aisle seats. Nice.

Once aboard, the FA's made exactly one pass through Y for drinks. One. On a three hour flight. And they couldn’t have looked more bored with their jobs if they tried.

Also, almost half of their mainline fleet are tired, worn out MD-80’s, with some of the worst onboard bin space in the industry.

Used to be an AA plat - don't really miss riding on them at all.
Your experiences and opinions are more similar to mine. I'm on the fence about which way to go. Now that I've secured low level status on each, I'm trying to decide which way to point for the remainder of the year (and thus mid-tier on one at least).

My experiences with AA domestic have been meh at best. The employees both at the airport and on board are surly or as you mentioned bored. I was on a flight from HNL-LAX and the flight attendants made 1 drink pass. And there was no way to get their attention to ask them anything. I was also abused by an AA FA because I was a late connect and bins were full. I had a very small laptop bag but the FA decided to use the last bin space to push a Kettle oversized roll aboard in. Then she proceeded to tell me I HAD to check my laptop bag. She was yelling "We can't inconvenience all of these other people for you." Well if that's how AA treats elites, I'm over that really quickly. FYI, my bag had more than just a laptop in it and it would have been impossible to unpack all electronics. Why not make the Kettle check the oversized roll aboard instead of yelling at one of your elites? That really made me ill.

So I came into this thread looking for answers. I don't like AA. In coach it's brutal unless you get an exit. The FA's are rude and annoying. And when anything goes wrong, I don't find them very willing to fix it they way the old UA would.

BUT will the new CO/UA with Smi/J at the helm mirror AA? If so, I don't want that either. I'm at a loss and wish I could figure out which way to go. All 4 legacies fit my flying patterns, but US and DL "pesos" turn me off them. I know each airline has the good and the bad, but if you hate stepping foot on a plane every time, the bad really stands out.

Any thoughts?
chicaloca453 is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2011, 4:49 am
  #94  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Programs: UA-1k, 1mm, Marriott-LT Platinum, Hertz-Presidents Circle
Posts: 6,355
Originally Posted by Carolinian
HMMM! Out of the frying pan, into the fire! Do you really want to earn the Zimbabwe dollars of the sky, SkyPiles?
+1 here for sure

Originally Posted by Often1
Presuming that you have the luxury of choosing a hub and therefore a primary carrier, I would advise waiting for at least 12 months. Clear that marketing efforts and cost structure will result in all legacy carriers vastly changing their frequent flyer program. Even if they don't change the rules, the practical impact of: 1) reduced capacity; 2) increased paid F travel inbound from overseas; paid F and Y/B travel by increased US domestic travel and an emphasis on large corporate account discounts mean: 1) fewer seats available for UG and therefore fewer UG, if any, below GS and even those largely at the gate; 2) a lot fewer award seats; and 3) lower availability of discounted fares (why would a carrier sell a coach seat at deep discount when someone willing to pay Y/B.

All in, the new business mode is that you will sit in the cabin in which you purchased a ticket. There will, of course, be occasional exceptions, but the days of folks spending less than $100K/year being UG are coming to a close. Whether that happens first on UA, DL, AA or US is anybody's guess.
I have to disagree with you, however you aren't exactly sticking your neck out with all your disclaimners in your last paragraph.

Originally Posted by LarkSFO
Please be sure to share your routes and dates with us please!

Majority opinion is that there are no cheap UACO fares to be found anywhere... (I don't completely agree with this, but I have noticed a tendency towards higher prices. And I have seen very few fares that justify a Mileage Run...)

Thanks for sharing your AA experiences... Many here are tempted; In my case so far SFO has been the deciding factor against AA. Even with the great new T2 at SFO, AA continues to reduce service... I guess that is what happens when you don't live in a cornerstone city.

Out of the blue, Alaska just gifted me MVP status... I am going to check the AS forum to see if this is really worth anything. If it is, maybe I'll direct some of my west coast (PDX, SEA) travel towards AS...
How can you say this when UA is in the midst of DEQM on Cali-ORD runs and you are based in SFO?
schley is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2011, 5:15 am
  #95  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto YYZ UA-1K 1MM,QFgold
Programs: Royal Ambassador/ SPG Platinum 75/Marriott gold
Posts: 14,283
Angry Warning AC will be going on Strike starting next week.

Originally Posted by UA_Flyer
In reality I have already jumped...sort of!

For the first time ever in 19 years, I have decided not flying the tulip on transpac roundtrip.

I moved to CO on the outbound and AC on the inbound. Some may say CO is part of UA, so that does not consider jumping ship.

.
I guess you got luck with AC its narrow coffin seats that are so uncomfortable it makes UA new seats seem like heaven. AC has got the worst FF program in STAR. Also when things go wrong you might as well give up if your flying AC, there is no customer service! Just get a flight problem and see how hopeless they are. [PS they are going on Strike next week'
I just did my first flights with CO last week and wow the food is a a huge improvement, however CO call center people are HOPELESS!
I will be sticking with UA!
why fly is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2011, 7:24 am
  #96  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: ABQ & RNO
Programs: AA EXP 4MM, Piper Dakota, Admirals Club, Hyatt Glob, Hilton Gold, Wyndham Diamond
Posts: 1,426
Luckily I'll re-qualify for EXP and 1K this year and I'll have one more year to decide. I'll be going with AA if MP continues its downward spiral.
236Dakota is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2011, 7:30 am
  #97  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
Originally Posted by schley
How can you say this when UA is in the midst of DEQM on Cali-ORD runs and you are based in SFO?
Just did a quick look in July and August for SFO-ORD R/T.

Best price I see for a quick turn - same day, or overnight in Chicago - is $408.

R/T EQM = 3682
R/T DEQM = 7364

So, even with DEQM, this is not a good or cheap MR.... $0.055 per EQM.

If the price was $300 R/T, it would be $0.04 / EQM

If the price was $250 R/T, it would be $0.034 / EQM

If you can find me a same day turn before 8/31 for less than $250, I'll buy it!
LarkSFO is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2011, 8:48 am
  #98  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Programs: AA LT Plat, UA 1k/1mm+, National EE, IC Plat, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 2,605
Originally Posted by LarkSFO
Why would you expect anything different than this?
- Maybe because CO USED to be able to manage those kinds of numbers for me?
- Maybe because AA still manages to do it?
- Maybe because my almost 200k EQMs and $40k annual spend (including personal trips with family) show more loyalty than a silver flying a fraction of this and spending a fraction of my spend over the course of a year?

Originally Posted by qoodoo
although many factors go into upgrades....I'm at 90%+...I've missed like 3 upgrades this year. All my fares are H or Y...I've done two mileage runs also that were elite heavy and still cleared all legs on a G fare lol...
Well...if you're on Y fares, that explains. But maybe things have gotten better now that B fares are much more expensive than they used to be before the alignment with UA B fares.

Last edited by iluv2fly; Jun 13, 2011 at 10:17 am Reason: merge
AAExPlat is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2011, 10:13 am
  #99  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: OPO
Programs: UA 1k MM, KLM Gold, Marriott Titanium, Hyatt Platinum
Posts: 312
I think about it once in a while (mostly while chewing my fingernails at the gate hoping for that 14-hour flight upgrade). But for now I'm staying put, after several years as CO Plat it's hard to change. The biggest consideration for me is international upgrade availability. Sadly, the days of cheap B + miles are gone, but I'm hoping I will still be able to do co-pay+miles on cheaper tickets. I travel internationally for work, but can only buy Economy fares, so all upgrades are out of pocket... if I can't upgrade on my own, UACO stops making sense. Though to be honest I don't think there is a better alternative.

As most people say, it's nice to be *A, but I have ZERO upgrades on partner carriers to show for it.
Jade_BR is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2011, 10:59 am
  #100  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,825
Originally Posted by AAExPlat
- Maybe because CO USED to be able to manage those kinds of numbers for me?
- Maybe because AA still manages to do it?
- Maybe because my almost 200k EQMs and $40k annual spend (including personal trips with family) show more loyalty than a silver flying a fraction of this and spending a fraction of my spend over the course of a year?
Maybe I am missing something here... I am relatively new to this game...

You are an AA EXP, a CO Plat, and a UA 1P per your profile. (this indicates that you travelled between 75K and 100K miles in 2010 on CO and UA. Or perhaps you flew greater than 100K and just have not matched to 1K yet?)

As a CO Plat, what was your upgrade percentage 'in the good old days'?

For 2011, your percentage is 56% (although with only 9 flights, this is a relatively small sample size. What routes are you succeeding / failing on?)

According to UDU stats site, for a 1P in 2011, UDU success is 63%, which is not that far from what you are hitting.

I guess bottom line is that the (UACO) world is changing. We all will be impacted to varying degrees. In your case, you are fortunate to have a solid and preferred alternative in AA.

For you and everyone else, we just need to continue to see how things progress, and make a decision who we want to be a customer of based upon which of the airlines best suits our needs and desires.

AAExPlat:
"AA 2011 EQM = 82,574 / UA 2011 EQM = 36,017
AA '11 UPG = 80/80 (100%) / UA '11 EUA = 5/9 (56%)"
LarkSFO is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2011, 11:14 am
  #101  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: UA 1K, HHonors Gold
Posts: 136
If you are 1K, it is tough to switch, as I feel that Customer Relations does take GS/1K concerns seriously. I had a spate of problems from the past year of flying, and one fantastic C.R. agent in Chicago handled them all with grace and aplomb, keeping me a happy 1K. I agree that the merger is not promising as far as "changes we will like," but as an ORD-based person, I don't think AA can compare at present.


F.T.
frequent traveler is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2011, 1:08 pm
  #102  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: East Coast
Programs: UA Lifetime Gold, AA Lifetime Platinum, Delta PM, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,522
Originally Posted by lhrsfo
I also have been tempted by AA, especially now that it has linked so closely with BA and OneWorld is gaining some traction. However, financially it is performing very poorly, so I suspect that the drastic cuts will be coming. That's principally why I have not jumped ship - the grass may be greener but for how long. On balance I think I'll stick with UA, although the 8 usable systemwides would be very nice indeed.
Bingo!!! That is the key word...................."USABLE SYSTEMWIDES".

That's why I do most of my personal travel (~95% & 115K EQMs) on AA and ~60% of my business travel on UA (~52K EQMs). The rest I spead out to AA and Virgin
NYC1K is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2011, 1:13 pm
  #103  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: East Coast
Programs: UA Lifetime Gold, AA Lifetime Platinum, Delta PM, Marriott Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,522
Originally Posted by ryerflyer
I wouldn’t get too excited about AA unless you’re in F a lot. DL had to move me to an AA flight EWR-DFW a few weeks ago. When I checked in at the ticket counter, I was assigned a middle seat as the agent said nothing else was left. At the gate, 10 minutes later, the agent said there were several aisle seats. Nice.

Once aboard, the FA's made exactly one pass through Y for drinks. One. On a three hour flight. And they couldn’t have looked more bored with their jobs if they tried.

Also, almost half of their mainline fleet are tired, worn out MD-80’s, with some of the worst onboard bin space in the industry.

Used to be an AA plat - don't really miss riding on them at all.
Sorry but this is what happes when you fly in Y and don't have status. If you were Ex-Plat on AA and you flew EWR-DFW you will be praising the airline. I have not flown in Y on AA domestic this year because I have a 100% upgrade success rate on AA as Ex-Plat. This will NEVER happen on UA even when I was a 1K for almost 6 years. Go figure!
NYC1K is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2011, 3:55 pm
  #104  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Programs: AA LT Plat, UA 1k/1mm+, National EE, IC Plat, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 2,605
Originally Posted by LarkSFO
Maybe I am missing something here... I am relatively new to this game...
I'm sure I am not explaining myself correctly, and that may be the issue. Let me address your questions. That may clear up a few things.

Originally Posted by LarkSFO
You are an AA EXP, a CO Plat, and a UA 1P per your profile. (this indicates that you travelled between 75K and 100K miles in 2010 on CO and UA. Or perhaps you flew greater than 100K and just have not matched to 1K yet?)
I am indeed EXP, CO Plat and UA 1P. Last year, I flew 76k EQMs on CO to requalify for Plat. This year, being a CO Plat makes me automatically 1P.

Originally Posted by LarkSFO
As a CO Plat, what was your upgrade percentage 'in the good old days'?
In 2003, 2004, and 2005, my upgrade percentages on CO were about 90%. Most of that flying was AUS-IAH-SFO-IAH-AUS. But there were also trips to other domestic destinations.

Originally Posted by LarkSFO
For 2011, your percentage is 56% (although with only 9 flights, this is a relatively small sample size. What routes are you succeeding / failing on?)
I seem to suceed on the least important flights (AUS-IAH-AUS) and failing on much else. I missed IAH-LAX, LAX-IAH, AUS-EWR, and one AUS-IAH so far this year. Last year, I cleared very few EWR to either IAH or AUS which is what I fly weekly.

Originally Posted by LarkSFO
According to UDU stats site, for a 1P in 2011, UDU success is 63%, which is not that far from what you are hitting.
That is possible. The bottom line is that on AA or DL, upgrade percentages for Plats are significantly higher than on CO...I understand 1k is better, but I'm not sure if I would clear 90% on UA as a 1k either given that I fly discount economy fares.

Originally Posted by LarkSFO
I guess bottom line is that the (UACO) world is changing. We all will be impacted to varying degrees. In your case, you are fortunate to have a solid and preferred alternative in AA.
Correct. I made that choice in 2009 and flew 6 months in the back virtually exclusively to earn myself a good upgrade percentage once I hit EXP.

Originally Posted by LarkSFO
For you and everyone else, we just need to continue to see how things progress, and make a decision who we want to be a customer of based upon which of the airlines best suits our needs and desires.
Correct. I will always maintain Star Gold, so I'll fly 50k EQMs with UA/CO every year no matter what happens, but if I could get treated like I do get treated on AA, I could either split my flying more evenly or give UA the lionshare like I did in 2007, 2008, and 2009. For now, I have 50k EQMs to monitor the merger progress each year. If things improve, so may my purchase patterns.
AAExPlat is offline  
Old Jun 13, 2011, 3:58 pm
  #105  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Programs: AA LT Plat, UA 1k/1mm+, National EE, IC Plat, Bonvoy Gold
Posts: 2,605
Originally Posted by NYC1K
Sorry but this is what happes when you fly in Y and don't have status. If you were Ex-Plat on AA and you flew EWR-DFW you will be praising the airline. I have not flown in Y on AA domestic this year because I have a 100% upgrade success rate on AA as Ex-Plat. This will NEVER happen on UA even when I was a 1K for almost 6 years. Go figure!
Correct. I fly this route every week and the flight attendants in F are oustanding for the most part, as are the ground personnel. Then again, when you see them every week, you build report that occasional travelers on that route won't necessarily have...
AAExPlat is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.