New depths of service for UA: ICN-SFO in C
#76
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Portland
Programs: UA 1K, AK Gold 75K, etc. etc.
Posts: 1,660
I guess I have been lucky. I have flown about 10 international trips in C or F since the beginning of 2010. In my experience, its like United is a different airline in 2010 and 2011 compared to the previous years. I have felt a very strong effort by every one of of the crews to provide good service and friendly service. In the previous 10 years, I have experience good and bad crews, but never the open hostility described by OP.
I have always found the food to be edible. I am a lover of fine food. I don't find UA's food particularly good in either C or F. However I haven't found SQ C food or LH C or F food to be up to standards that I would call "fine." While the food on SQ of LH might be better than UA (mostly, but not always), the difference would not be enough to make me choose one over the other. For me, a decent hard product, friendly FAs who are genuinely trying to make your flight a good experience are what makes my flight good.
If SFO flight crews are the surly ones, I guess that I am lucky to be flying out of the midwest.....perhaps that would be the silver lining of having moved from the bay area to DSM a few years ago
I have always found the food to be edible. I am a lover of fine food. I don't find UA's food particularly good in either C or F. However I haven't found SQ C food or LH C or F food to be up to standards that I would call "fine." While the food on SQ of LH might be better than UA (mostly, but not always), the difference would not be enough to make me choose one over the other. For me, a decent hard product, friendly FAs who are genuinely trying to make your flight a good experience are what makes my flight good.
If SFO flight crews are the surly ones, I guess that I am lucky to be flying out of the midwest.....perhaps that would be the silver lining of having moved from the bay area to DSM a few years ago
#77
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London and Madrid
Programs: BA Gold, UA 2MM, Hyatt Globalist, Columbia Record & Tape Club Triple Diamond VIP
Posts: 580
It was odd... especially since the seat was not broken.
Oh well. I didn't really have high hopes for contacting UA.
Any other suggestions about how to direct this? I'm inclined to just leave the matter here.
#78
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver • DEN-APA
Programs: AF Platinum, EK Gold, AA EXP, UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 21,592
#80
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2007
Location: London and Madrid
Programs: BA Gold, UA 2MM, Hyatt Globalist, Columbia Record & Tape Club Triple Diamond VIP
Posts: 580
#81
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,165
Gee, and I remember getting attacked for calling UA "not a real airline" and pointing out how my international-based friends and customers wouldn't set foot on a UA flight unless there was a fare fire-sale too good to pass up.
I just don't see any reason to pay for Business and get subjected to this sort of abusive behavior from flight crews. Sure, you can find less-than-stellar service on any/every airline, but some varient of this sort of experience has been the hallmark of UA for far too long.
Last week we were instructed to begin booking clients away from United for all flights (domestic/international) and steer that business to specific other carriers, who are standing ready with extensive and very attractive incentive programs for net fares, cert/mileage-less upgrades and status matches - passing this information to my clients is yielding a huge sigh of relief and we're going to have a very easy time convincing even UA-centric customers to make the switch.
The message about service and product is only delivered with a commensurate drop in $$ - neither Smisek nor his team or the Board give a woop about our service expectations or experience - for them, it's a take it leave it proposition. The organization I'm involved in has decided to leave it, and the resulting 8-figure loss in revenue is going to get noticed....whether anything changes in management's 'tude is yet to be seen.
I just don't see any reason to pay for Business and get subjected to this sort of abusive behavior from flight crews. Sure, you can find less-than-stellar service on any/every airline, but some varient of this sort of experience has been the hallmark of UA for far too long.
Last week we were instructed to begin booking clients away from United for all flights (domestic/international) and steer that business to specific other carriers, who are standing ready with extensive and very attractive incentive programs for net fares, cert/mileage-less upgrades and status matches - passing this information to my clients is yielding a huge sigh of relief and we're going to have a very easy time convincing even UA-centric customers to make the switch.
The message about service and product is only delivered with a commensurate drop in $$ - neither Smisek nor his team or the Board give a woop about our service expectations or experience - for them, it's a take it leave it proposition. The organization I'm involved in has decided to leave it, and the resulting 8-figure loss in revenue is going to get noticed....whether anything changes in management's 'tude is yet to be seen.
#82
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 5,577
It will not be any better with any other U.S. legacy carrier. It is unfortunate that the longhaul routes are worked by senior F/As. That's the dilema and there are no ifs and buts about it, although granted there is the occasional, rare exception. Foreign carriers are sometimes better, sometimes not. In any case, for those of us who fly on their own dime and mostly in the back of the plane, realistically there is no option given E+ is an UA exclusive. With W fares reaching unrealistic highs and still not guaranteeing SWU success, that's the way it has to be at least for me and Mrs.EX.
#83
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: LAX/TPE
Programs: United 1K, JAL Sapphire, SPG Lifetime Platinum, National Executive Elite, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 42,165
It will not be any better with any other U.S. legacy carrier. It is unfortunate that the longhaul routes are worked by senior F/As. That's the dilema and there are no ifs and buts about it, although granted there is the occasional, rare exception. Foreign carriers are sometimes better, sometimes not. In any case, for those of us who fly on their own dime and mostly in the back of the plane, realistically there is no option given E+ is an UA exclusive. With W fares reaching unrealistic highs and still not guaranteeing SWU success, that's the way it has to be at least for me and Mrs.EX.
I've flown over a dozen longhaul trips in CO BF - I've never had a single episode that came even close to the average complaint I've read here. Sure, I had one rather terse no-nonsense FA on a flight to Japan and one FA who sort of ignored my travel companion on a OGG-IAH (back when CO flew this route with BF) a couple of times, but in many hundreds of combined BF/F and Y segments on CO, I've had to write in a grand total of twice to complain about inflight issues, and I've written in more than that to compliment crews.
UA didn't clean up their service mess when they were an independent company - now they're run by a crew bent on one thing - money - and under the impression they are the biggest airline and no one has a realistic alternative - I doubt we'll be seeing anything improve.
DL is really getting their act together - something I thought Anderson would be incapable of - and for us *A folks, there is always the great service and amenities of Air Canada from YYZ or YVR to Europe, Asia or Australia.
#84
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: SFO
Posts: 3,938
#85
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 7,541
BTW, this is also why I get so amused when people complain about not having real "champagne" in F - the fact that the typical bottle of wine in C and even int'l F is something that 1) can be purchased for around $8-12 in your local grocery store and 2) is not even a good $8-12 bottle from that selection, is what should be complained about.
#86
Join Date: Mar 2010
Programs: UA GS, F9 Summit, Marriott Gold, HH Gold, Hyatt Plat
Posts: 333
It will not be any better with any other U.S. legacy carrier. It is unfortunate that the longhaul routes are worked by senior F/As. That's the dilema and there are no ifs and buts about it, although granted there is the occasional, rare exception. Foreign carriers are sometimes better, sometimes not. In any case, for those of us who fly on their own dime and mostly in the back of the plane, realistically there is no option given E+ is an UA exclusive. With W fares reaching unrealistic highs and still not guaranteeing SWU success, that's the way it has to be at least for me and Mrs.EX.
#87
Moderator, Omni, Omni/PR, Omni/Games, FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Between DCA and IAD
Programs: UA 1K MM; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 67,106
I didn't want to be the one to post that first, but yes, that is my experience, too. I've had a few of my best crews ever on UA in recent months, as well as the worst. And they fit the categorizations above to a T.
#88
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: LAS ORD
Programs: AA Pro (mostly B6) OZ♦ (flying BR/UA), BA Silver Hyatt LT, Wynn Black, Cosmo Plat, Mlife Noir
Posts: 5,992
I was referring to the non-sparkling wines. Even Iron Horse (which is what was often whined about by faux-elitists on FT for not being "champagne") goes for $35-40. My point was that instead of complaining about the "champagne" label they should be complaining about the awful quality of non-sparkling wines. The non-sparkling offerings on my int'l F and C flights are certainly in the range I mentioned, with maybe one getting around $15ish tops. I've also often found that the listed wines on the menu are not available even on int'l F flights. And again, my real problem is that these aren't even good $8 or $12 or $15 bottles. In any case, sorry for any lack of clarity.
#89
Join Date: May 2001
Location: RDU
Programs: UA Plat 2MM, Delta Gold, Hilton Gold, Marriott cardboard
Posts: 1,699
I was referring to the non-sparkling wines. Even Iron Horse (which is what was often whined about by faux-elitists on FT for not being "champagne") goes for $35-40. My point was that instead of complaining about the "champagne" label they should be complaining about the awful quality of non-sparkling wines. The non-sparkling offerings on my int'l F and C flights are certainly in the range I mentioned, with maybe one getting around $15ish tops. I've also often found that the listed wines on the menu are not available even on int'l F flights. And again, my real problem is that these aren't even good $8 or $12 or $15 bottles. In any case, sorry for any lack of clarity.
#90
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: LAS
Programs: PA FT, TW Gold, NW/CO PE, VK Eagleflyer
Posts: 7,173