UK ban on international travel
#2
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: BRS
Programs: BA Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 4,986
I think we have to wait until tomorrow for the finer details of the way the guidelines are written.
Then we can find out if it is a case of "we'd rather you didn't" or whether Border Force Bob will arrest us at the frontier on the return.
Then we can find out if it is a case of "we'd rather you didn't" or whether Border Force Bob will arrest us at the frontier on the return.
#4
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,551
Also, as you will see in the BA forum, mass cancellations have started for this month and into early December, so you risk being stranded abroad on the way back (or having to be rebooked with a transit somewhere with quarantine).
#5
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
I think this title is misleading, there is no 'ban on international travel', more of a ban on holidays and leisure. The GOV.uk wording is deliberately ambiguous, it is up to you to decide if you are 'legally' allowed to travel for family, work reasons etc.
#6
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
The lockdown will discourage people for travelling for no reason anyway, especially as travelling for holiday is quite limited given most of Europe is in lockdown, Asia is almost impossible to get into without quarantine, and the USA isn't much easier.
#7
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: UK
Programs: BA Gold
Posts: 1,021
How will Border force Bob know when you left the country? I see this being 'enforced' like the Tier 1-2-3 restrictions in the UK, and I quote a London Restaurant 'we do not care if you mix indoors, it is not our job to police.' So looks like a 'we'd rather you didn't', and I am sure if you are famous or are all over instagram and appear on DailyMail showing off about it, you'd get an FPN of 200 GBP by Police after you'd returned if that assuming you didn't have to quarantine of course!
The lockdown will discourage people for travelling for no reason anyway, especially as travelling for holiday is quite limited given most of Europe is in lockdown, Asia is almost impossible to get into without quarantine, and the USA isn't much easier.
The lockdown will discourage people for travelling for no reason anyway, especially as travelling for holiday is quite limited given most of Europe is in lockdown, Asia is almost impossible to get into without quarantine, and the USA isn't much easier.
#9
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NW London and NW Sydney
Programs: BA Diamond, Hilton Bronze, A3 Diamond, IHG *G
Posts: 6,343
If you have several passports with different names that the system hasn't linked, you might "get away" with it but you could also "get away" with lying on the PLF if nobody reads it
#10
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Kent, UK
Programs: M&S Elite+
Posts: 3,649
I don't know if the information appears on the screen when they scan your passport or if it requires a bit more digging, but they don't need a PLF to know when you last departed the UK.
If you have several passports with different names that the system hasn't linked, you might "get away" with it but you could also "get away" with lying on the PLF if nobody reads it
If you have several passports with different names that the system hasn't linked, you might "get away" with it but you could also "get away" with lying on the PLF if nobody reads it
#11
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Kazakhstan
Programs: BA Gold, AirAstana Silver (much use as chocolate teapot)
Posts: 867
#12
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 7,218
UK authorities could simply ask the airlines to send their passengers' APIS information and use that. In my days at BA Heathrow Customer Services I've seen plenty of instances where US Homeland security had very clear visibility of our information and knew exactly, for those people they wanted to interrogate before boarding, who they were, residence & nationality, DoB and past travel including self-made connections or weird interlines. They knew, for instance, that a guy flying to ORD on BA had started his journey in Mogadishu on Daallo Airlines and transferred on BA at DXB. The UK government has either the same access or can get it fairly easily: if they want to enforce whatever blockage, whatever prohibition... they can.
#13
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NW London and NW Sydney
Programs: BA Diamond, Hilton Bronze, A3 Diamond, IHG *G
Posts: 6,343
For the past 5 or so years you have been obliged to send in all current foreign passports when renewing a British passport, and the British passport will be refused if the other passports are in different names unless you can prove you are unable to change the name in the other passport(s).
I have done this therefore I must assume that even if I put my Australian passport details in the outgoing API and British passport for the incoming, the UK authorities will be aware they are both the same person.
I suppose I could test this by using my Australian passport to enter the UK, leave with British passport in the API, then more than 6 months after the first entry try to enter again and see if they try to refuse me for "overstaying"
Relevant thread: Word with the fuzz!
#14
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Kent, UK
Programs: M&S Elite+
Posts: 3,649
What do you mean by "flagged up"? If you use a non-British passport to enter or exit the UK, and the UK is aware that you are also a British citizen, there is nothing to flag up.
For the past 5 or so years you have been obliged to send in all current foreign passports when renewing a British passport, and the British passport will be refused if the other passports are in different names unless you can prove you are unable to change the name in the other passport(s).
I have done this therefore I must assume that even if I put my Australian passport details in the outgoing API and British passport for the incoming, the UK authorities will be aware they are both the same person.
I suppose I could test this by using my Australian passport to enter the UK, leave with British passport in the API, then more than 6 months after the first entry try to enter again and see if they try to refuse me for "overstaying"
Relevant thread: Word with the fuzz!
For the past 5 or so years you have been obliged to send in all current foreign passports when renewing a British passport, and the British passport will be refused if the other passports are in different names unless you can prove you are unable to change the name in the other passport(s).
I have done this therefore I must assume that even if I put my Australian passport details in the outgoing API and British passport for the incoming, the UK authorities will be aware they are both the same person.
I suppose I could test this by using my Australian passport to enter the UK, leave with British passport in the API, then more than 6 months after the first entry try to enter again and see if they try to refuse me for "overstaying"
Relevant thread: Word with the fuzz!
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA 1K, MM *G for life, BAEC Gold
Posts: 10,220
Clearly HMG is capable of checking if they choose to do so. And clearly, there isn't an automated system to do this currently and, given HMG's competence with IT systems, it's unlikely there will be one in the near future. So my guess is that the determined will be able to travel with a few lies here and there and with little risk of being caught - and then, if caught, only receiving an FPN. Were this the US, the substantive offence would be the lie and that would land you in a whole heap of trouble - but in the UK we don't really bother.
But I still ask myself who can sensibly do this? Perhaps someone with a second home somewhere less restrictive than here and who doesn't care if they get back before Christmas, or indeed before the Spring. I don't really see much need to spend too much time on enforcement when the practical difficulties will mean few people will be tempted to break the rules - and those few are all on FT!
But I still ask myself who can sensibly do this? Perhaps someone with a second home somewhere less restrictive than here and who doesn't care if they get back before Christmas, or indeed before the Spring. I don't really see much need to spend too much time on enforcement when the practical difficulties will mean few people will be tempted to break the rules - and those few are all on FT!