Stansted or Gatwick to AMS on EasyJet
#1
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 55,189
Stansted or Gatwick to AMS on EasyJet
I'm planning a visit to England in early April for about a week and will be flying into LHR but flying back to JFK from AMS. I've been to Gatwick before but never to Stansted. I don't know where I'll be staying in London but assume it's in central London.
Which is the easier airport for travel to AMS on a Monday midday between 11-14:30? When I say easier, I mean quicker security/passport control (more lines to make it more quick?), easier ground transportation by train from London, gates closer to airport rail station, things like that.
Thanks!
Which is the easier airport for travel to AMS on a Monday midday between 11-14:30? When I say easier, I mean quicker security/passport control (more lines to make it more quick?), easier ground transportation by train from London, gates closer to airport rail station, things like that.
Thanks!
#3
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 55,189
#5
Moderator: UK and Ireland & Europe
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Biggleswade
Programs: SK*G, Lots of Blue Elsewhere
Posts: 13,611
If you can get a cheap flight from City, that wins hands down.
You could also consider Southend. It's a tiny, quiet, friendly little airport out east, with a direct train from Liverpool Street. The flight to Amsterdam is seriously short, and free of many of the London delays.
On the downside, there's nothing to do in the airport, the trains are fairly poor commuter stock, and it is quite some distance from London.
You could also consider Southend. It's a tiny, quiet, friendly little airport out east, with a direct train from Liverpool Street. The flight to Amsterdam is seriously short, and free of many of the London delays.
On the downside, there's nothing to do in the airport, the trains are fairly poor commuter stock, and it is quite some distance from London.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,192
#10
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 1,546
Remember to add in cost if getting to the airport - which can vary a lot. By public transport, travel to LCY is only £1.50 / £3 (depending where in London you start from). LHR £3 to £5. LGW transfer will be £10 to £15 and other airports progressively more.
#11
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Flatland
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold 1MM, BA Gold, UA Peon
Posts: 6,109
LCY to AMS is nice experience but expensive. Also tends to suffer delays especially in winter. BA Cityflyer have also got some problems with more routes than is reasonable with their fleet size and any breakdown or delay screws up a lot of services. All LCY airlines are affected by weather there, Cityjet seem a bit more punctual than BACF overall.
STN to AMS is reliable, but Easy only fly 2-3 times a day in winter on the current timetable. Stansted ground experience is fairly awful since the new owners' redesign for retail in favour of transportation. Get the security fast track or queue 15 mins at least.
LGW is fairly reliable and overall not a bad experience, and Easyjet have a comprehensive service 6-7 times each day. It's quite fine in the middle of the day. Also, BA from LGW are cheap.
There is also an airport at Heathrow with services to Amsterdam If you can get a decent price, LHR-AMS is quite OK, and in the middle of the day Terminal 5 works well (AMS almost always departes from T5A so it's fairly fast to get to the gate).
Luton remains the unwashed armpit of London airports, there is no reason to consider it.
Note that AMS can suffer arrival delays if it's very windy or in the morning if foggy. Waiting on the ground in the UK for an hour until you can get a departure slot for AMS is not as rare as I would like it to be.
In your position I would probably go in decreasing order of preference:
(LCY if cheap), LGW, LHR, STN, train to the ferry and another train, LTN.
STN to AMS is reliable, but Easy only fly 2-3 times a day in winter on the current timetable. Stansted ground experience is fairly awful since the new owners' redesign for retail in favour of transportation. Get the security fast track or queue 15 mins at least.
LGW is fairly reliable and overall not a bad experience, and Easyjet have a comprehensive service 6-7 times each day. It's quite fine in the middle of the day. Also, BA from LGW are cheap.
There is also an airport at Heathrow with services to Amsterdam If you can get a decent price, LHR-AMS is quite OK, and in the middle of the day Terminal 5 works well (AMS almost always departes from T5A so it's fairly fast to get to the gate).
Luton remains the unwashed armpit of London airports, there is no reason to consider it.
Note that AMS can suffer arrival delays if it's very windy or in the morning if foggy. Waiting on the ground in the UK for an hour until you can get a departure slot for AMS is not as rare as I would like it to be.
In your position I would probably go in decreasing order of preference:
(LCY if cheap), LGW, LHR, STN, train to the ferry and another train, LTN.
#12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 55,189
Originally Posted by rcspeirs
Remember to add in cost if getting to the airport - which can vary a lot. By public transport, travel to LCY is only £1.50 / £3 (depending where in London you start from). LHR £3 to £5. LGW transfer will be £10 to £15 and other airports progressively more.
Originally Posted by flatlander
LGW is fairly reliable and overall not a bad experience, and Easyjet have a comprehensive service 6-7 times each day. It's quite fine in the middle of the day. Also, BA from LGW are cheap.
There is also an airport at Heathrow with services to Amsterdam If you can get a decent price, LHR-AMS is quite OK, and in the middle of the day Terminal 5 works well (AMS almost always departes from T5A so it's fairly fast to get to the gate).
#13
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
Programs: BAEC
Posts: 2,644
If you want to consider an "interesting" airline choice to AMS, Garuda Indonesia fly most days LGW-AMS on a 777-300ER. They are normally fairly cheap.
Best check fares on skyscanner.net, rather than trawling every airline site individually.
STN has pretty much finished their makeover, and it's not too bad. LTN I also don't think is too bad, as long as you avoid the 8am Wizzair manic departure bank. Middle of the day in off-season the terminal is nearly deserted. There's a nice new Aspire Lounge there too.
If you're not in too much of a rush, you can get to STN and LTN quite easily by bus. I live in North London, so go from Golders Green, and it's less than an hour to either airport, and costs from £1 if you book via easybus.com.
A final good option is the Eurostar via Brussels. It takes a bit longer than flying maybe, but is fairly civilised, and you can take more stuff and liquids with you. The connection in Brussels is very easy. I did this once to Amsterdam, staying the night in Antwerp half way at no extra cost (as long as your arrive at your final NL destination less than 24 hours after leaving London).
http://seat61.com/Netherlands.htm
Best check fares on skyscanner.net, rather than trawling every airline site individually.
STN has pretty much finished their makeover, and it's not too bad. LTN I also don't think is too bad, as long as you avoid the 8am Wizzair manic departure bank. Middle of the day in off-season the terminal is nearly deserted. There's a nice new Aspire Lounge there too.
If you're not in too much of a rush, you can get to STN and LTN quite easily by bus. I live in North London, so go from Golders Green, and it's less than an hour to either airport, and costs from £1 if you book via easybus.com.
A final good option is the Eurostar via Brussels. It takes a bit longer than flying maybe, but is fairly civilised, and you can take more stuff and liquids with you. The connection in Brussels is very easy. I did this once to Amsterdam, staying the night in Antwerp half way at no extra cost (as long as your arrive at your final NL destination less than 24 hours after leaving London).
http://seat61.com/Netherlands.htm
#15
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Flatland
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold 1MM, BA Gold, UA Peon
Posts: 6,109
I have to almost completely disagree, and I go there at least twice a month.
Security: slow, always. 15 minute queue is the norm, not the exception. LHR T5 is almost always better.
Airside progress: slow, always, due to enforced maze of retail, and a long walk or a train to gates.
Seating: rarely enough, and never enough outside the winter doldrums.
Gates announced only 40 mins before, never earlier, even if the aircraft is on stand overnight.
Crowding: between crowded and very crowded every time.
Car Parking: expensive AND incompetently managed
Public transport: Only from London via train, everything else is crap.
Car drop-off: you want HOW much to drive up so a passenger can jump out?
The only parts MAG haven't comprehensively screwed up is baggage handling (still good, done by others than MAG) and arrivals (UK Border has the new e-gates).
There are more places to eat than there used to be - if you can get a seat in any of them.
It's a horrible place now, I hate it.
Security: slow, always. 15 minute queue is the norm, not the exception. LHR T5 is almost always better.
Airside progress: slow, always, due to enforced maze of retail, and a long walk or a train to gates.
Seating: rarely enough, and never enough outside the winter doldrums.
Gates announced only 40 mins before, never earlier, even if the aircraft is on stand overnight.
Crowding: between crowded and very crowded every time.
Car Parking: expensive AND incompetently managed
Public transport: Only from London via train, everything else is crap.
Car drop-off: you want HOW much to drive up so a passenger can jump out?
The only parts MAG haven't comprehensively screwed up is baggage handling (still good, done by others than MAG) and arrivals (UK Border has the new e-gates).
There are more places to eat than there used to be - if you can get a seat in any of them.
It's a horrible place now, I hate it.