TK to announce IST-AU flights

Old Jul 24, 23, 7:23 am
  #76  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Programs: TK Elite Plus,QR Platinum,BAEC GGL,ITA Executive, AFKL Gold, HH Diamond,Bonvoy Gold,ALL Gold
Posts: 13,910
Originally Posted by AirCanada881
SIN is a Star Alliance hub. KUL is one world
TK has codeshare agreements with both Malaysia Airlines and Singapore Airlines so both could be considered as reasonable.
ISTFlyer is offline  
Old Jul 24, 23, 4:06 pm
  #77  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: MEL CHC
Posts: 20,478
Some turbulence
AU AFR ----> Minister says government will review Turkish air rights
(maybe behind a paywall)
Transport Minister Catherine King says she will review whether Turkish Airlines can add more flights to Australia, blaming the carrier for failing to submit a formal request before it was set to announced expanded services. The Australian Financial Review on Monday reported that Turkish Airlines chairman Ahmet Bolat had blamed “legal issues” with the government for calling off plans to outline the additional flights last week. Mr Bolat added that the airline, one of the world’s largest, wanted to fly 14 flights per week, or daily services, to both Sydney and Melbourne.

A spokeswoman for Ms King said Turkish Airlines was “already entitled to operate a total of up to seven services per week to Australia... under current bilateral arrangements, subject to meeting safety, security and licensing requirements”. “These critical regulatory processes will take many months to complete before services could commence to Australia,” she added.
<snip>
djsflynn likes this.
Mwenenzi is offline  
Old Jul 26, 23, 12:10 am
  #78  
TPJ
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: TK*G (E+), IHG Plat Ambassador
Posts: 7,838
Originally Posted by Mwenenzi
Some turbulence
AU AFR ----> Minister says government will review Turkish air rights
(maybe behind a paywall)
Is AU Transport Minister on QF payroll these days? First they rejected QR application for more traffic rights (despite the fact that during COVID QR was almost the only airline serving AU repatriating thousands of Oz citizens abandoned by their government back home) and now this...

Last edited by TPJ; Jul 26, 23 at 12:15 am
TPJ is offline  
Old Jul 26, 23, 5:32 am
  #79  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,631
I don't believe Qantas has had a hand in this, from what the Govt is saying the fault lies with TK and its application process.
djsflynn is offline  
Old Jul 26, 23, 6:45 am
  #80  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: London
Programs: Hilton, IHG - BA, GA, LH, QR, SV, TK
Posts: 16,690
Originally Posted by djsflynn
I don't believe Qantas has had a hand in this, from what the Govt is saying the fault lies with TK and its application process.
Government statements don't always represent the complete and unassailable truth
TPJ likes this.
IAN-UK is offline  
Old Jul 26, 23, 6:47 am
  #81  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,631
Originally Posted by IAN-UK
The government statement isn't an unassailable truth.
I'm not saying it is, but there are at least two sides to any story.
djsflynn is offline  
Old Jul 26, 23, 1:29 pm
  #82  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Programs: Star Alliance Gold, Oneworld Silver
Posts: 633
It does sound like protectionism... These things are surely never to do only with submitting an application form or similar... If any government wants to get things moving, they can.
FlyerLX is offline  
Old Jul 26, 23, 7:58 pm
  #83  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,631
Originally Posted by FlyerLX
It does sound like protectionism...
And I'm certainly not disagreeing with that this decision coming so soon after the move to block QR's AU expansion certainly does not look good.
TPJ, FlyerLX and ISTFlyer like this.
djsflynn is offline  
Old Jul 28, 23, 12:40 am
  #84  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,631
Update: it does appear that TK has yet to file the final paperwork, although the exact nature of that paperwork is TBA, but a statement supplied to me by TK in response to recent comments by the relevant AU government minister's office says:
So far, we have received optimistic feedback and support on our mission of expanding our direct services to the Australian market.
Planning something as complex as this naturally takes time and comprehensive deliberation between many parties.
We are in the final stages of negotiations and look forward to making the necessary licence applications once we are ready to do so.
Italics are mine for emphasis, and indicate "the necessary licence applications" have not been made.

(This goes back to my earlier comment that "there are at least two sides to any story").
Mwenenzi likes this.

Last edited by djsflynn; Aug 4, 23 at 7:07 am
djsflynn is offline  
Old Aug 4, 23, 7:04 am
  #85  
 
Join Date: May 2023
Posts: 42
Originally Posted by TPJ
Is AU Transport Minister on QF payroll these days? First they rejected QR application for more traffic rights (despite the fact that during COVID QR was almost the only airline serving AU repatriating thousands of Oz citizens abandoned by their government back home) and now this...
Oh please! They didn't fly repat service as a charity. In fact I remember seeing some airfare horror stories. Added to that the invasive searches "on suspicion" of many Australian women in Doha has QR still on the nose with many. It's still a big deal with non FFers.
Aurelian is offline  
Old Aug 5, 23, 12:17 am
  #86  
TPJ
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: TK*G (E+), IHG Plat Ambassador
Posts: 7,838
Originally Posted by Aurelian
Oh please! They didn't fly repat service as a charity. In fact I remember seeing some airfare horror stories. Added to that the invasive searches "on suspicion" of many Australian women in Doha has QR still on the nose with many. It's still a big deal with non FFers.
Friendly reminder - the reason for the airfare increase to ridiculous & astronomical levels was AU government action that introduced quotas of passengers who could fly to AU each day. Airlines were not able to fly full capacity so fares went up - we call it supply and demand, if memory serves... Airfares to countries that had no COVID travel restrictions like MX stayed at more or less normal levels.

All very OT - so let's finish discussion on QR here...
djsflynn and nacho like this.
TPJ is offline  
Old Aug 5, 23, 12:30 am
  #87  
 
Join Date: May 2023
Posts: 42
Originally Posted by TPJ
Friendly reminder - the reason for the airfare increase to ridiculous & astronomical levels was AU government action that introduced quotas of passengers who could fly to AU each day. Airlines were not able to fly full capacity so fares went up - we call it supply and demand, if memory serves... Airfares to countries that had no COVID travel restrictions like MX stayed at more or less normal levels.

All very OT - so let's finish discussion on QR here...
Sure...and a friendly reminder, about QR...you brought it up. Supply and demand yes, possibly .Seriously what put QR out of pocket by NOT increasing fares astronomical;y? Just because you can doesn't mean you should. Then to infer they are the "good guys"...I repeat "Oh Please" . Nothing more than gouging people in a poor situation.
Aurelian is offline  
Old Sep 26, 23, 10:16 pm
  #88  
TPJ
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: TK*G (E+), IHG Plat Ambassador
Posts: 7,838
https://www.executivetraveller.com/n...lights-to-2024

Unfortunately recent changes in QF leadership did not change protectionist attitude of AU civil aviation authorities.
TPJ is offline  
Old Sep 28, 23, 5:18 am
  #89  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Bali
Programs: BAEC Gold / TK e+
Posts: 481
wonder what happened to the original plan of using DPS as the stop off?
QF would really soil their pants if they did that
mfgr is offline  
Old Sep 29, 23, 6:44 pm
  #90  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: MEL CHC
Posts: 20,478
Originally Posted by TPJ
https://www.executivetraveller.com/n...lights-to-2024
Unfortunately recent changes in QF leadership did not change protectionist attitude of AU civil aviation authorities.
24 Jul Minister says government will review Turkish air rights
Jul 24, 2023 – 6.42pm
Transport Minister Catherine King says she will review whether Turkish Airlines can add more flights to Australia, blaming the carrier for failing to submit a formal request before it was set to announced expanded services.
<snip>

A spokeswoman for Ms King said Turkish Airlines was “already entitled to operate a total of up to seven services per week to Australia... under current bilateral arrangements, subject to meeting safety, security and licensing requirements”. “These critical regulatory processes will take many months to complete before services could commence to Australia,” she added.
23 Jul https://www.afr.com/companies/transp...0230723-p5dqjd
<snip>
While sources close to Qantas indicated the airline did not oppose Turkish Airlines’ expansion, the federal government did not answer questions about why it is not trying to help lower the cost of flying for Australians.<snip>
https://australianaviation.com.au/20...says-minister/

Nothing *political* stopping TK operating 7 flights now. They have the rights for 7, but are not using. They want 14 services (daily MEL & SYD?). Getting the *technical* requirements is another issue.

MEL airport would welcome flights. SYD airport has a 23:00-05:00/06:00 curfew and a political limit on aircraft movements per hour. Getting a slot at SYD is hard.

For selling tickets SIN<-->MEL-SYD TK need 5th freedom rights from Singapore.
Mwenenzi is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.