FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Turkish Airlines | Miles&Smiles (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/turkish-airlines-miles-smiles-641/)
-   -   B787 Dreamliner (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/turkish-airlines-miles-smiles/1937459-b787-dreamliner.html)

starflyergold Oct 25, 2018 11:59 pm

B787 Dreamliner
 

Turkish Airlines in this week’s schedule update opened reservation for flights operated by Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner aircraft, set to enter long-haul service in the 3rd quarter of 2019.
Initial routes are: Washington, Atlanta, Bogota, Bali.

https://www.routesonline.com/news/38...from-sep-2019/

Seatmap:

https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.fly...1c7fbeaf11.png

AvidFlyer1990 Oct 26, 2018 1:28 am

The J seating chart looks interesting!! I might take an EXTRA LONG detour to IST, just to try out the 789.

craigthemif Oct 26, 2018 1:54 am

Two thoughts...

1. Pilots, maintenance, flight attendants, etc. all need to be specifically trained for each aircraft type, yet TK seems to be unable to even focus on one of Airbus or Boeing.

2. Why assign the 787 to a "long and thin" route such as BOG, but then keep the PTY hop? (which I understand is due to being unable to take off from BOG altitude with enough fuel to get all the way to IST)

hamallu Oct 26, 2018 7:35 pm


Originally Posted by AvidFlyer1990 (Post 30357688)
The J seating chart looks interesting!! I might take an EXTRA LONG detour to IST, just to try out the 789.

Smells like the Thompson Vantage XL in "honeymoon" config

EDIT:
Hmmm actually I might be wrong as the window/window-side aisle seats don't match up.

dozerman94 Oct 27, 2018 3:43 pm


Originally Posted by craigthemif (Post 30357743)
2. Why assign the 787 to a "long and thin" route such as BOG, but then keep the PTY hop? (which I understand is due to being unable to take off from BOG altitude with enough fuel to get all the way to IST)

The economical performance of A332 on the route might be of concern as well. That route is pushing the capabilities of A332 pretty far, I would assume 789 is much cheaper to operate on such a route. Also they might not be able to fill an entire plane just for BOG or PTY.

binman Oct 28, 2018 1:45 am

I am booked on the DPS service for August but hadn’t appreciated that it was only due to start on the 17th July. That does not leave much room for delays to start up.

There is no seat map available for the 787 sectors I am booked on.

looking forward to my first TK long haul and just hope the 787-9 launches as planned

flyjfk Oct 28, 2018 6:51 pm

TK is designing its own seat for J on 787s, but I've heard it won't be suites (like Qsuites or Delta)

axxoo25 Oct 30, 2018 12:44 pm


Originally Posted by flyjfk (Post 30366916)
TK is designing its own seat for J on 787s, but I've heard it won't be suites (like Qsuites or Delta)

source?

starflyergold Oct 31, 2018 1:52 am

I think there's some confusion here. TK are designing their own economy seat from scratch. The business class seat is being designed with existing manufacturers (in the same way most airlines custom design seats for their service).

flyjfk Oct 31, 2018 9:45 am

The article you're referring to as the economy seat design is from 2014. The business class seats are being designed by TK and will not be suites with sliding doors.

Edit: @starflyergold Ah, I misread your post :) yes, they are designing the seats themselves with existing manufacturers. I did not mean TK is manufacturing the seats, I just meant they are designing it :)

dcstudent Nov 12, 2018 5:39 pm

Anyone know the seating in coach? 3-3-3 or 3-4-3?

dozerman94 Nov 12, 2018 11:48 pm


Originally Posted by dcstudent (Post 30423101)
Anyone know the seating in coach? 3-3-3 or 3-4-3?

It is 3-3-3. I don't think 3-4-3 layout even exists for the 787 on any airline, maybe you meant 2-4-2.

dcstudent Nov 13, 2018 6:37 am


Originally Posted by dozerman94 (Post 30423919)
It is 3-3-3. I don't think 3-4-3 layout even exists for the 787 on any airline, maybe you meant 2-4-2.

Sorry, I was thinking 787 and typing economy for the 777. So yes 3-3-3 or 2-4-2. Thanks for letting me know it's 3-3-3. It's too bad in a way, when I travel with my wife in Y we like having the 2 side to ourselves on the A330 rather than sharing with a person we don't know. But, we'll live!

1kBill Nov 13, 2018 7:14 am


Originally Posted by dozerman94 (Post 30423919)
I don't think 3-4-3 layout even exists for the 787 on any airline ...

Well, not yet at least. ;)

starflyergold Nov 13, 2018 9:44 am


Originally Posted by dozerman94 (Post 30423919)
It is 3-3-3. I don't think 3-4-3 layout even exists for the 787 on any airline, maybe you meant 2-4-2.

Well one operator managed to squeeze a 3-4-3 arrangement into an A350 :eek: I guess anything is possible these day.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:11 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.