Nearly Half of Travelers in Trusted Travelers Program?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 580
Nearly Half of Travelers in Trusted Travelers Program?
According to this article,http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/c...918-story.html forty-five percent of travelers this summer were able to use Precheck because of their enrollment. Does this sound right? It seems to be higher than expected.
The article claims that over half of the travelers at MDW were able to use the program because of enrollment. However, as MDW sends many travelers to Precheck through randomizers, I am wondering whether over half of the travelers were actually enrolled in the program or if many used it through the use of randomizers. Also, does the percentages given in the article include the people who received Precheck on their boarding pass but did not sign up for a trusted traveler program?
In the article, the TSA claims that the LAG restriction will be changed, likely for those enrolled in Precheck first. However, since Precheck is not guaranteed, what would happen if one enrolled in the program tries to bring a bottle of water and then learns that he or she does not have Precheck for a particular day? I actually thought that they were supposed to ease the restriction many years ago, so I would not be surprised if they continue with the current restriction for many years.
The article claims that over half of the travelers at MDW were able to use the program because of enrollment. However, as MDW sends many travelers to Precheck through randomizers, I am wondering whether over half of the travelers were actually enrolled in the program or if many used it through the use of randomizers. Also, does the percentages given in the article include the people who received Precheck on their boarding pass but did not sign up for a trusted traveler program?
In the article, the TSA claims that the LAG restriction will be changed, likely for those enrolled in Precheck first. However, since Precheck is not guaranteed, what would happen if one enrolled in the program tries to bring a bottle of water and then learns that he or she does not have Precheck for a particular day? I actually thought that they were supposed to ease the restriction many years ago, so I would not be surprised if they continue with the current restriction for many years.
Last edited by guflyer; Sep 17, 2014 at 9:02 pm Reason: I realized that my comment was not clear.
#2
Join Date: May 2011
Location: San Antonio, TX
Programs: AA EXP, DL Silver, Global Entry
Posts: 1,863
I can't get the article to open up right so can't read the details but on the surface the 45% seems high. I can imagine that percentage based on airline FF program enrollment and status, trusted traveler program enrollment, and random selection all taken together. Somewhere, maybe here, I read an article about the total number of flyers enrolled in trusted traveler programs and as I recall the numbers seemed way, way lower than the total number of frequent flyers.
#3
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
According to this article,http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/c...918-story.html forty-five percent of travelers this summer were able to use Precheck because of their enrollment. Does this sound right? It seems to be higher than expected.
The article claims that over half of the travelers at MDW were able to use the program because of enrollment. However, as MDW sends many travelers to Precheck through randomizers, I am wondering whether over half of the travelers were actually enrolled in the program or if many used it through the use of randomizers. Also, does the percentages given in the article include the people who received Precheck on their boarding pass but did not sign up for a trusted traveler program?
In the article, the TSA claims that the LAG restriction will be changed, likely for those enrolled in Precheck first. However, since Precheck is not guaranteed, what would happen if one enrolled in the program tries to bring a bottle of water and then learns that he or she does not have Precheck for a particular day? I actually thought that they were supposed to ease the restriction many years ago, so I would not be surprised if they continue with the current restriction for many years.
The article claims that over half of the travelers at MDW were able to use the program because of enrollment. However, as MDW sends many travelers to Precheck through randomizers, I am wondering whether over half of the travelers were actually enrolled in the program or if many used it through the use of randomizers. Also, does the percentages given in the article include the people who received Precheck on their boarding pass but did not sign up for a trusted traveler program?
In the article, the TSA claims that the LAG restriction will be changed, likely for those enrolled in Precheck first. However, since Precheck is not guaranteed, what would happen if one enrolled in the program tries to bring a bottle of water and then learns that he or she does not have Precheck for a particular day? I actually thought that they were supposed to ease the restriction many years ago, so I would not be surprised if they continue with the current restriction for many years.
I would guess that the majority of frequent flyers are enrolled in some kind of "tt" program, but since frequent flyers do not make up the majority of travelers, I can't accept what the TSA says.
P.S. I can't get it to load properly either. In any case, this is probably only a reprint of a TSA press release as well as a take off on the latest Blog thread:
http://blog.tsa.gov/2014/09/summer-w...e-busiest.html
#4
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dulles, VA
Programs: UA Life Gold, Marriott Life Titanium
Posts: 2,757
I can't get the article to open up right so can't read the details but on the surface the 45% seems high. I can imagine that percentage based on airline FF program enrollment and status, trusted traveler program enrollment, and random selection all taken together. Somewhere, maybe here, I read an article about the total number of flyers enrolled in trusted traveler programs and as I recall the numbers seemed way, way lower than the total number of frequent flyers.
#5
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 616
It seemed like over half of the people were getting directed to the Pre Check line at MCO when I was there a couple of months ago. I didn't mind since I don't have Pre Check and the magic IPad directed me to that line. Everybody followed the directions and the line moved very quickly.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 38,410
I can't get the article to open up right so can't read the details but on the surface the 45% seems high. I can imagine that percentage based on airline FF program enrollment and status, trusted traveler program enrollment, and random selection all taken together. Somewhere, maybe here, I read an article about the total number of flyers enrolled in trusted traveler programs and as I recall the numbers seemed way, way lower than the total number of frequent flyers.
#8
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,813
TSA sez almost half of all passengers are Pre?
I don't see it at the airports I frequent. The busiest I hit frequently is ATL. I peg PRE at about 20%.
Does anyone at any airport see anything approaching 50% of passengers through PRE Check lines?
Sorry if this is in the wrong place.
Does anyone at any airport see anything approaching 50% of passengers through PRE Check lines?
Sorry if this is in the wrong place.
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,042
Who at TSA said this? A employee complaining because they have to do some work? An actual press release? This sounds like water-cooler talk by an employee venting they have to work.
#10
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Portland, Oregon
Programs: United Mileage Plus, EVA Infinity Mileage Lands, Alaska mileage plan
Posts: 41
I do not believe I have seen as much as 20% of the people at security go through precheck. But the percentage might get up to 25% if you adjust because people get through precheck faster. At SFO the airport that I have been at with the longest lines is seems like much less than that. Of course, SFO would benefit greatly if you could move from terminal to terminal inside of security like you can at DFW.
#11
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,813
I don't see it being anywhere near half but a big wig with TSA said it
TSA Administrator John Pistole visited MDW and ORD.
I've seen similar things quoted in other articles.
TSA Administrator John Pistole visited MDW and ORD.
During his visit, he noted that almost half of U.S. airline passengers passed through the TSA’s PreCheck program this summer, explaining that this is a “sign that prescreening is becoming the norm.
#12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,399
The quote seems to include those being "randomly" directed to PreCheck lines in addition to those who have it preapproved on the boarding pass.
#13
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Camp Hill, Pa.
Posts: 229
I wasn't aware non-US citizens could get pre, but our friends who are British residents (born and raised there) both had TSA PreCheck on all their flights within the US the past two weeks. They even got it on their flight leaving IAD back to LHR.
Half might be a stretch, but if they're getting it maybe not as much as you'd think.
Half might be a stretch, but if they're getting it maybe not as much as you'd think.
#14
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
I don't see it being anywhere near half but a big wig with TSA said it
TSA Administrator John Pistole visited MDW and ORD.
I've seen similar things quoted in other articles.
TSA Administrator John Pistole visited MDW and ORD.
During his visit, he noted that almost half of U.S. airline passengers passed through the TSA’s PreCheck program this summer, explaining that this is a “sign that prescreening is becoming the norm.
Drop the random assignments and I would wager that the number would be around 25%, if that.