New American 777-200 retrofit Business Class (AA 772 J) trip report
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2012
Location: MCO
Programs: AA, B6, DL, EK, EY, QR, SQ, UA, Amex Plat, Marriott Tit, HHonors Gold
Posts: 12,809
CX First Class should certainly not disappoint.

#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Usually in SAN or Central Europe.
Programs: AA:EXP/1MM. Accor/Radisson:Silver; HH:Gold; ICH:Plt Amb.
Posts: 22,251
It looks like there are only 3 seats in the MCE center section (per the photo). I thought that MCE was going to be 3-4-3 on the 772?
#20
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Stockholm
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 202
Another thing I forgot to add is that lavatories on 772 were not as spacious as on 77W.
There has been some discussion on whether I felt 772 seat was superior in comfort compared to 77W, the answer is - no. I still think that 77W is the best J in terms of comfort and privacy on AA.
Comparing retrofitted 772 and 763 I would rank 772 higher in terms of privacy and 763 in terms of space, but of course with the lack of built-in IFE and almost no privacy. So it really depends on what's more important for you.
Last edited by TokinaMaso; Oct 16, 14 at 8:03 pm
#23
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: JFK > LGA >> EWR
Programs: AA EXP 1.2mm, Kimpton IC, Starwood Gold, Marriott Gold
Posts: 2,177
On the previous 777-200 configuration, that awkward gap between J and Y was covered after takeoff. Did you happen to notice whether that's still the case?
#24
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: IAD
Posts: 318
#25
Original Poster
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Stockholm
Programs: AA EXP
Posts: 202
#26
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: IAD
Posts: 318
I also don't understand why they didn't just go with the popular Cirrus seat. By my count the seat density is only slight higher than the 77W (52 seats in 13 rows on 77W vs. 45 in 11+1 seat in row 6 on 777). They only get one extra seat in the new config vs. the Cirrus seat.
The Cirrus seat is really, IMO, the best business class in the sky. It is the perfect blend of privacy, space, comfort and layout. Just flew CX in the same seat and slept great.
The Cirrus seat is really, IMO, the best business class in the sky. It is the perfect blend of privacy, space, comfort and layout. Just flew CX in the same seat and slept great.
Even if the pitch is marginally shorter, having shorter pitch doesn't help until it adds up to a full row. Assuming around 45" pitch in J, you'd need to be 4" shorter than the cirrus seat to get an extra row. I doubt it is 4" shorter.
#27
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Sacramento, CA
Programs: AA Exec Plat, Hyatt,Marriott,BA,AS
Posts: 4,351
Do you think AA ever pre-tested these seats and the cabin layout (forward and backward facing seats, seat width and space, ability to look out the window, etc) with actual passengers before they committed to what I think is a bizzare layout ? Do 50% of the people actually prefer to fly backwards? Certainly not me.
#28
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: LA
Posts: 7,162
Do you think AA ever pre-tested these seats and the cabin layout (forward and backward facing seats, seat width and space, ability to look out the window, etc) with actual passengers before they committed to what I think is a bizzare layout ? Do 50% of the people actually prefer to fly backwards? Certainly not me.
#29
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,056
Do you think AA ever pre-tested these seats and the cabin layout (forward and backward facing seats, seat width and space, ability to look out the window, etc) with actual passengers before they committed to what I think is a bizzare layout ? Do 50% of the people actually prefer to fly backwards? Certainly not me.
Was assigned to 13A, rear-facing C on the UA 747, a few years back. Haven't gone back to forward facing seats on UA since the. Absolutely love rear facing.
#30
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ORD
Programs: AA EXP,2MM, DL Gold,Starwood PLT
Posts: 3,876
So, it will be very hit or miss for both aircraft for some time.