Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Why do people fly commuter jets when..

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Why do people fly commuter jets when..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 29, 2008, 9:18 pm
  #31  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pittsburgh
Programs: MR/SPG LT Titanium, AA LT PLT, UA SLV, Avis PreferredPlus
Posts: 31,008
It depends on the trip, but I've the tried train up and down the east coast and NYC-BOS is the only one I've taken regularly. Our office in BOS is about 2 blocks away - I can walk out of a conference room about 25 minutes before departure and have plenty of time. And NYC is just a quick subway hop away - much easier than cabbing it to BOS and in from LGA.

I've traveled NY to DC many times and the plane is faster unless there's bad weather. If you're spending two hours in the airport, the equation may change, but you're also wasting a whole lot of pointless time. You can skew the equation the same way by adding 75 minutes for the train trip. I can almost always be through TSA and to the gate in 20 minutes from arriving at the airport, so 45 minutes is what I usually plan for.
CPRich is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2009, 3:00 am
  #32  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: YVR
Programs: AC SE 2MM; UA MP Premier Silver; Marriott Bonvoy LT Titanium Elite; Radisson; Avis PC
Posts: 35,255
Originally Posted by bundi404
It is usually a lot cheaper and less hassle to take a bus or train? I am just thinking about the Tri-state/ New England Are, where people can jump on a train or bus for a ticket 1/2 the price of an airline ticket and less hassle ( think NYC-BOS etc..)
Like others... airline status and believe it or not, sometimes it's just more convenient!
yyznomad is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2009, 5:31 am
  #33  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: KBOS
Programs: BA GfL
Posts: 921
Originally Posted by bundi404
It is usually a lot cheaper and less hassle to take a bus or train? I am just thinking about the Tri-state/ New England Are, where people can jump on a train or bus for a ticket 1/2 the price of an airline ticket and less hassle ( think NYC-BOS etc..)
I prefer to take the bus or train if I'm not pressed for time. Otherwise, I usually do a straight day trip on the shuttle. Or a combination of bus/train to New York and then the last evening flight out of JFK (B6 or AA) on the return. I rarely sleep in New York since hotels are about the same price as or more than a walk-up fare on the shuttle.
Peregrine415 is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2009, 6:11 am
  #34  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Programs: Nothing - I'm useless!
Posts: 2,441
Originally Posted by Peregrine415
I prefer to take the bus or train if I'm not pressed for time. Otherwise, I usually do a straight day trip on the shuttle. Or a combination of bus/train to New York and then the last evening flight out of JFK (B6 or AA) on the return. I rarely sleep in New York since hotels are about the same price as or more than a walk-up fare on the shuttle.
Just be happy you can take a train. The residents of Florida have tried countless times to get a rail option (admittedly we're fond of "mono" rails) that connects Tampa, Orlando, and Miami.
KNRG is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2009, 8:01 am
  #35  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Louisville, KY, US
Programs: QF Plat - OW EMD | DL Gold / Starwood Gold
Posts: 6,106
Originally Posted by KNRG
Just be happy you can take a train. The residents of Florida have tried countless times to get a rail option (admittedly we're fond of "mono" rails) that connects Tampa, Orlando, and Miami.
Too many places with no train / rail / lightrail services here in the US. Heck, we can't even get an additional bridge, let alone two, built across the Ohio River, which we needed years ago.

I've heard friends in TPA talk of Florida building a rail line built to connect TPA/MCO/MIA for not only pax/tourism usage, but for use in hurricane evacuations. I don't know the details or politics behind it, but if there is one area that can use such service, the I-4 corridor should be high on the list given the state of I-4 usage.

At one point there was Amtrak service from Louisville to Chicago - not sure if it still exists, but it was a 12 hour trip. SDF-CHI (ORD or MDW) is a 1 hr flight & you can drive CHI in 6 hours (depending on wx and traffic). I always fly it and come out ahead except during winter irregular ops, in which case the roads won't be much better (esp having to drive via northern Indiana w/lake effect snow).

The state of public transport in this country is pathetic - if this new administration is going to spend money on infrastructure to help spur the economy, I think we need to take a serious look at public transport with city to city high speed rail links (plus upgrade our outdated ATC system). Projects like these would spur all types of jobs compared to a standard "roadworks" project.

There are only a handful of cities that have excellent public transport systems & there are many cities with public transport systems that can be improved through lightrail systems.
SDF_Traveler is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2009, 8:03 am
  #36  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC (formerly BOS/DCA)
Programs: UA 1K, IC RA
Posts: 60,745
Have you ever taken Amtrak? Not the most reliable service in the world. It's real fun to be stuck for 4 hours in Connecticut with an engine breakdown, let me tell you.
magiciansampras is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2009, 8:06 am
  #37  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Central Texas
Programs: Many, slipping beneath the horizon
Posts: 9,859
Originally Posted by bundi404
It is usually a lot cheaper and less hassle to take a bus or train? I am just thinking about the Tri-state/ New England Are, where people can jump on a train or bus for a ticket 1/2 the price of an airline ticket and less hassle ( think NYC-BOS etc..)
Not in the Northeast but....

With no trains and little in the way of public transport to airports, my alternatives are my car or shuttle vans. DFW is 2:45 by shuttle (2:20 by car) with only a few trips to/fm each day by shuttle, with none to IAH (3:15 by car). Counting parking fees, gas or the shuttle fares, for many if not most destinations, airfares are actually as cherap or cheaper, plus I'm 8 minutes and no traffic or stoplights from the airport, free parking and short lines at security (allowing arrival at the terminal 35 minutes before flights).
TMOliver is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2009, 12:40 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: BCN
Programs: BA Gold · A3 Gold · DL Gold · VY apologist
Posts: 8,545
I've only flown BCN-MAD once since the AVE started running (and that was a requal flight; I didn't actually need to be in MAD). Counting travel time to the airport vs. the station nearest my house, it takes almost exactly the same time to go from home to the center of Madrid. On the train I have a roomy space to spread out and work, a 3G connection the whole way, a real meal, and zero security hassles. And it costs me about the same.
alanw is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.