Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Diaper change in empty seat?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Diaper change in empty seat?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2008, 11:10 am
  #46  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 144
Originally Posted by Kettering Northants QC
About 2 months ago Mrs Northants JP and I were dining in a busy restaurant in our home town when we were amazed to see someone changing any obviously dirty nappy on a table adjacent to theirs.
Pretty common, sadly. My favorite was at Boston Market, where Mommy Piggy was changing baby's brown mess on a table right across the rail from the food counter. The woman in front of me was going ballistic because the manager (who she must have called over just before I got there) shrugged and refused to make Mommy Piggy stop. He said "The stuff we wipe the tables with will kill any bacteria." Yeah, but it's a little unappetizing to see/smell that while picking up your food. The woman stormed out, leaving her order and vowing to call their 800 number. I called too and actually got the same agent the original woman talked to but I didn't get the impression they cared any more than the manager did. Never went to that Boston Market again.
MCOFlyer is offline  
Old Oct 18, 2008, 3:46 pm
  #47  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Portland, OR
Programs: AA Gold, UA
Posts: 38
I'll have to agree with the other poster's description of what a diaper can and cannot hold. While they are filled with superabsorbent polymer, there is a limit to the liquid that can be absorbed. Also, many poopy diapers result in what all parents call a blowout. A poopy diaper that is contained can become a minor blowout if the child moves the wrong way and/or pees on top of it. The poop is not absorbed but stays on the surface and can prevent the pee from being absorbed properly. Also, a poopy diaper smells almost as bad a one that is being changed in the open only the smell keeps on going.

The first time I flew with my 3 month old son, the UA flights did not have a changing table. He was not that large but it was still difficult to change him on top of the toilet seat lid with a changing pad underneath him. on top of that the lavatory was gross and I was risking exposing him to everyone else's bodily fluids. Its difficult for many men/women to pee in a toilet on the ground imagine in air with turbulence/vibrations.

The FA actually told me to change my son in the seat between my huband and me. We chose to take him to the lavatory since he was poopy, but it was a tricky maneuver. I can't imagine it now that he's older and much squirmier.
I do think it would be wrong to change any baby in the seat without a pad to protect the seat. Also, changing a baby at the dinner table in a restaurant is a no non in my book. We have changed a pee diaper in the boarding area but that is because my little guy is afraid of public toilets flushing.
marisky23 is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2008, 12:34 pm
  #48  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,731
Originally Posted by peachfront
I'm guessing I'm saying, in my own tongue in cheek way, that I don't think either represents any genuine risk.

In my experience, and it goes back many years so I freely admit I could be wrong, the greatest risk is changing the diaper of a baby boy and somehow while the diaper is off then he manages to send out a pretty good spray and hit somebody. Not cool but I think we have at least all agreed that the urine is sterile.
The words you are looking for are "enterovirus" and "giardia" - both can be transmitted in stool from a person with no symptoms of disease. Trace of poop on the tray table, you're the next pax in the seat, your snack/glass on the tray table, you touch the table as you pick up your snack, and cooties down your throat/playing on your mucus membranes.
CDTraveler is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2008, 10:38 am
  #49  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SNA
Programs: DL PM, UA, AA, Priority Club, Marriott Rewards
Posts: 378
Flying from LAX to YVR last July with my family, kid behind us obviously needs a change (the whole damn cabin reeked) and mother refused to do it. She was pretending she did not smell it. The whole last hour of the flight we had to deal with that smell. Finally, once we landed, she decides to change the kid right there on the seat.

Unbelievably classless.
1worldtrader is offline  
Old Oct 2, 2010, 10:39 pm
  #50  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: UA1K,MM
Posts: 87
After a diaper change in the lavatory. Is it ok to just put it in the lavatory trash as is? Put in plastic bag?
Tinman is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2010, 5:52 am
  #51  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Massachusetts, USA; AA Plat, DL GM and Flying Colonel; Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 24,232
Originally Posted by Tinman
After a diaper change in the lavatory. Is it ok to just put it in the lavatory trash as is? Put in plastic bag?
Since the lav trash itself already goes into a strong plastic bag, from a sanitation point of view I don't think it matters. I'd say it would depend on the potential of that particular diaper to cause offensive odors while unwrapped. If it could, wrap it.

(Thinking back to my own long-gone diaper-changing days, nearly all of the ones we felt a need to change would have been in the wrap-it category.)
Efrem is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2010, 7:01 am
  #52  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 1,211
Originally Posted by 1worldtrader
Flying from LAX to YVR last July with my family, kid behind us obviously needs a change (the whole damn cabin reeked) and mother refused to do it. She was pretending she did not smell it. The whole last hour of the flight we had to deal with that smell. Finally, once we landed, she decides to change the kid right there on the seat.

Unbelievably classless.
In this situation, IF there were no changing table in the lav, what should one do? Wait or change on the seat? Not sure there are always good options here...
(Responding to this old post now that the thread has been revived...)
jonu is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2010, 9:40 am
  #53  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere between here and there...
Programs: WWF, Appalachian Mountain Club
Posts: 11,595
Originally Posted by jonu
In this situation, IF there were no changing table in the lav, what should one do? Wait or change on the seat? Not sure there are always good options here...
(Responding to this old post now that the thread has been revived...)
I know it's rude to answer a question with a question, but what would you do if there was no empty seat? The floor? The galley? how about the closed toilet in the lav. Ask the FA for some sort of cleanser if you're worried about germs. It'll probably be cleaner than either the seat or definitely the floor, and you spared all the other pax.
tkey75 is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2010, 12:55 pm
  #54  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Singapore, Warsaw, Surfers Paradise
Programs: KrisFlyer Gold>>>Silver>>>Blue, Finnair Silver, Royal Caribbean Diamond
Posts: 5,158
Nothing wrong about a quick nappy change as long as it's invisible liquid... but not "solids" (even if they're in liquid form).
aster is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2010, 8:44 pm
  #55  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,098
Originally Posted by bmvaughn
Something tells me this is going to get closed, but I did a search and didn't find any other threads where this had occurred previously.

I was on a flight LAX-SEA this past weekend (UA 6112) and the gentleman in the seat behind me - whose son had been using the tray table behind me as a drum and who did not stop his son from doing so when I had asked nicely - began to change his son's diaper in the empty seat. I couldn't believe someone would have the cojones to do this - on a small CR7 noless.

I was incredibly disgusted when the FA walked by and didn't say a thing. Granted, there's no changing table on the CR7, but the guy didn't even go to look!
I am not sure why ANYONE needs to travel with babies, but they do...ugh. I was on a Southworst flight in which I saw a woman change a baby's poopy diaper and then put the soiled diaper into the seat back pocket. Another reason to avoid coach and/or low cost carriers.
pinworm is offline  
Old Oct 3, 2010, 10:07 pm
  #56  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Massachusetts, USA; AA Plat, DL GM and Flying Colonel; Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 24,232
Originally Posted by pinworm
I am not sure why ANYONE needs to travel with babies...
Often, it's because leaving a baby home alone for three weeks is frowned upon, and finding competent, trustworthy 24/7 child care at an affordable price is impractical.

Other reasons may include relocating when the family includes a baby they don't want to leave behind, taking a baby to visit relatives when it's more practical for mommy/daddy and the kid to travel than for twenty-three aunts, uncles, aged grandparents and so on to go the other way, etc., etc.

Bottom line: we may be in a position to make suggestions as to how one should travel with a baby here, but to suggest that it's never necessary? That's absurd.
Efrem is offline  
Old Oct 4, 2010, 1:23 am
  #57  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: LAX
Posts: 10,906
Just curious how germophobes and such feel about staying in hotel rooms...
I am pretty sure that more diapers are changed on couches, tables, counters etc than on any plane seat but luckily we are blissfully unaware of that (and who knows what other, ahem, "unsanitary" activities).

Not that I encourage in-seat diaper changes but suggesting that this somehow endangers the rest of us is rather silly. I put the activity in the same group as public breastfeeding - as long as I don't see it i don't care.
azepine00 is offline  
Old Oct 4, 2010, 6:43 am
  #58  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ORD MDW
Programs: AA, UA, DL , IHG Plat, Bonvoy Gold - 2009 FT Fantasy Football Champion
Posts: 6,854
Originally Posted by azepine00
Just curious how germophobes and such feel about staying in hotel rooms...
I am pretty sure that more diapers are changed on couches, tables, counters etc than on any plane seat but luckily we are blissfully unaware of that (and who knows what other, ahem, "unsanitary" activities).
Well now I have something new to think about!
sobore is offline  
Old Oct 4, 2010, 10:49 pm
  #59  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,098
Originally Posted by Efrem
Often, it's because leaving a baby home alone for three weeks is frowned upon, and finding competent, trustworthy 24/7 child care at an affordable price is impractical.

Other reasons may include relocating when the family includes a baby they don't want to leave behind, taking a baby to visit relatives when it's more practical for mommy/daddy and the kid to travel than for twenty-three aunts, uncles, aged grandparents and so on to go the other way, etc., etc.

Bottom line: we may be in a position to make suggestions as to how one should travel with a baby here, but to suggest that it's never necessary? That's absurd.
OR, you get used to the idea that when you have a baby, you will not be flying or eating in restraunts for at least 5 years. In those 5 years, you still have options: Get a sitter while you dine out. Have your relatives visit you instead of you visting them. Want a vacation? No trustworthy sitters? Too bad. I still fail to see a NEED to travel with an infant, save getting it some sort of medical procedure.
pinworm is offline  
Old Oct 4, 2010, 11:54 pm
  #60  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Marriott or Hilton hot tub with a big drink <glub> Beverage: To-Go Bag™ DYKWIA: SSSS /rolleyes ☈ Date Night: Costco
Programs: Sea Shell Lounge Platinum, TSA Pre✓ Refusnik Diamond, PWP Gold, FT subset of the subset
Posts: 12,509
Originally Posted by pinworm
Originally Posted by Efrem
Often, it's because leaving a baby home alone for three weeks is frowned upon, and finding competent, trustworthy 24/7 child care at an affordable price is impractical.

Other reasons may include relocating when the family includes a baby they don't want to leave behind, taking a baby to visit relatives when it's more practical for mommy/daddy and the kid to travel than for twenty-three aunts, uncles, aged grandparents and so on to go the other way, etc., etc.

Bottom line: we may be in a position to make suggestions as to how one should travel with a baby here, but to suggest that it's never necessary? That's absurd.
OR, you get used to the idea that when you have a baby, you will not be flying or eating in restraunts for at least 5 years. In those 5 years, you still have options: Get a sitter while you dine out. Have your relatives visit you instead of you visting them. Want a vacation? No trustworthy sitters? Too bad. I still fail to see a NEED to travel with an infant, save getting it some sort of medical procedure.
(bolding mine) Gee, I dunno, terminally ill or bedridden folks getting to see their young loved ones before they pass?
N965VJ is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.