![]() |
Another reason to avoid them if possible ;) :D |
Make sure not to put it in the microwave, or the sensor goes poof. The passport, will then, of course, become invalid (I would assume so anyway, with a hole in it or worse).
|
Originally Posted by GUWonder
What does it say inside your passport as authorizing/issuing agency? Simply "Department of State", as is more recently being done (especially for those done via the mail)? (The standard used to be either "National Passport Agency/Office" or "New York [or other city in its place] Passport Agency/Office".
The Denver passport facility is the only one that is closest to 100% RFID-implementation. |
Originally Posted by lopez151
All U.S. Passport agencies, embassies, and consulates print Department of State as issuing authority. This was changed almost a year ago.
About the RFID tags in passports, this is interesting reading (to see what the government ignored): http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/p...rfid_draft.pdf |
Just for background, here's something about RFID-enabled credit cards:
http://prisms.cs.umass.edu/~kevinfu/...manuscript.pdf |
Originally Posted by GUWonder
Just for background, here's something about RFID-enabled credit cards:
http://prisms.cs.umass.edu/~kevinfu/...manuscript.pdf |
Originally Posted by muddy
Sounds pretty insecure. Any idea how to tell if a particular credit card is RFID?
|
Originally Posted by xyzzy
Chase is offering cards with RFID in them under the brand name Blink. An article on that is here. Such cards have a Blink logo identifying them as being RFID-enabled.
LOL ... say that another way "your CC can potentially be elecronically accessed while its in your possession inside your pocket" and it doesn't sound like "added security" to me. However, since the blink cards are shipping since summer 2005, I guess we would have heard something if there were large scale security issues. Maybe Im being an old fogey, but I still wouldnt use one. |
Originally Posted by Palal
Make sure not to put it in the microwave, or the sensor goes poof. The passport, will then, of course, become invalid (I would assume so anyway, with a hole in it or worse).
I thought I read that a mal-functioning RFID passport would still be valid. I guess if you nuke it and end up with a burned spot that may be another story. I also read that some people are hitting the chip with a hammer. |
Originally Posted by muddy
From that same link "Rau claims that results from the blink pilot and other research shows that consumers consider contactless technology to be "simple, fast and convenient," and that "consumers enjoyed the added security from retaining possession of their cards while paying." "
It does have one risk in that there was a case of fraud where said reader had a magstripe skimmer fitted, but generally it works. I must admit to being surprised that the passports were of the contactless type. Neil |
This thread is not really related to travel safety or security so I'm transferring it to TravelBuzz where it'll gain a wider audience.
Please follow it there. Thanks. ______________________________ Cholula Travel Safety/Security Forum Moderator |
maybe i am naive, but i just don't see the big deal of having an RFID passport. especially if it makes the immigration queue go faster! i will just purchase an external RFID shield and not give it a second thought. whats the risk?
|
Originally Posted by muddy
LOL ... say that another way "your CC can potentially be elecronically accessed while its in your possession inside your pocket" and it doesn't sound like "added security" to me. However, since the blink cards are shipping since summer 2005, I guess we would have heard something if there were large scale security issues. Maybe Im being an old fogey, but I still wouldnt use one.
"Contactless processing" => "contactless theft", in the absence of proper encryption processes being used at the proper points, in the absence of closed loop only accessiblity for those tightly monitored, in the absence of adjustments in payment processing. There are ways for it to be pretty secure, but I'm not so sure that's being done here. With passports, it'll be worse faster, for criminal gangs are already on the move in that area. |
Originally Posted by nd_eric_77
maybe i am naive, but i just don't see the big deal of having an RFID passport. especially if it makes the immigration queue go faster! i will just purchase an external RFID shield and not give it a second thought. whats the risk?
|
Originally Posted by Palal
RFID is extremely insecure and is subject to copying. It's relatively easy to make a high-powered antenna that will read RFID tags from quite a distance. It has been shown that most protections on the passport can be broken and the passport can be cloned. Do you want someone to come into the country with your credentials?
http://computerworld.co.nz/news.nsf/...257230000696BD |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:49 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.