![]() |
Does the prisoner get miles?
|
Originally Posted by greenery
The suspect in Thailand, John Marr, is flying back to America on Thai Airlines flight 794 non stop to LAX leaving in a hour
|
Originally Posted by greenery
The suspect in Thailand, John Marr, is flying back to America on Thai Airlines flight 794 non stop to LAX leaving in a hour (from 8:00 AM August 20th EDT). It is non stop and will take about 16 hours. I would hate to be him and/or the people who have to sit next to him on that long flight.
CNN and the AP must have paid a pretty penny for those last-minute tickets. |
Wow, I thought this thread was about me. :eek: I am contemplating taking a dangreous tube of mascara on the plane with me soon.
|
Originally Posted by LegalEagle
Part of my law enforcement career was spent as a deputy sheriff. My gripe was when returning back home without a prisoner a law enforcement officer had to check his/her sidearm in baggage, and they put a BIG RED TAG on the hard sided bag (it had to be hard sided). The tag announced to the world that the bag contained a firearm and all but announced to the world to STEAL THIS BAG.
|
I once saw a prisoner being transported post 9/11 CLT-DCA. I think he was coming from TN and was in an orange jump suit with one noticable guard next to him. He boarded via the jetway before F was called and sat in the rear of the A/C. In the front of the plane on the same flight was Tom Ridge when he was Sec-DHS and he had his own detail scattered throughout the plane. Between the prisoner, the detail and the FAMs on board and the fact that the plane about only about 40% full; the proportion of guns to passengers on that flight most have been incredibly high.
|
Originally Posted by abmj-jr
This is a pretty accurate description of the process. I did several extradition transports back in my younger days before I retired. Generally, the prisoner is dressed with long sleeves and you probably won't notice the cuffs unless you are looking closely. They are always preboarded and always sit in the back in a window seat with an officer beside on the aisle and one behind if it is 2 across seating. Although I never flew where the side section was 3 across, I suspect the prisoner would then be in the middle, with the officers on either side. We usually used an ankle holster back then to minimize the chance of being seen to be armed.
JR |
Originally Posted by Passmethesickbag
Does the prisoner get miles?
|
I recently read that the US Marshall (and other) prisoner transport services use planes siezed from drug raids. So that's a neat trick, but I'm guessing it's still more expensive than flying coach.
They don't let your basic LEO carry on the plane, but how about a US Marshall? |
The Karr transport almost had to be on Thai Airways, ASFAIK they are the only carrier that flies nonstop from BKK to the West Coast. You absolutely wouldn't want to transport a prisoner on a flite with stop(s) or change of plane.
When the initial reports aired about Karr and escorts flying in BizClass, I was ticked. Then they talked about his drinking champagne, beer, and wine. I was even more ticked. Then I mulled it over and wonder - 1) Maybe the number of the party (at least 4 people) and last-minute booking of the flite meant that they couldn't fly in the back because there weren't enough seats. Perhaps the only seats they could get were in the front cabin. (This flite only has two classes of service, business and premium economy.) Also, the authorities had to know there would be media circus onboard, and having Karr in the front cabin would somewhat lessen the chaos. 2) Perhaps the alcohol was allowed to try to get him "to talk," as he had when paraded to the press in BKK. There now are reports that he made self-incriminating comments between the airport and the LAX jail. Jetlag plus booze equals verbal runoff? It's clear they are handling this guy deliberately and carefully. The whole thing is chilling. The guy is either a monster murderer or a monster deranged pedophile looking for fame. I keep thinking "innocent until proven guilty," but it's difficult in this case. Back to the original topic of this thread. Years ago when I worked as a ticket and gate agent for a national carrier we would get prisoners being transported all the time. My recollection is that the prisoner was not allowed to be handcuffed while onboard. The reasoning was that if the person had to be cuffed s/he was too dangerous to be onboard a commercial flite, and that it would alarm other pax. There was always a lot of paperwork, as the escorts were always armed. I'm sure the rules have changed and continue to evolve with the times. |
Originally Posted by TierFlyer
... They don't let your basic LEO carry on the plane...
Marshals, FBI and other federal agents USED to be exempt from the carry rules and flew armed whether actually on duty or not. I have no idea what the rule is these days. JR |
Originally Posted by bluewatersail
Have you ever flown on a plane that was transporting a prisoner/convict/felon, etc?
Yeah, today. DFW-DCA on AA. Some little kid that must have gone AWOL was being "escorted" by 2 guys that looked very serious, but the kid was not in handcuffs, in fact he was pulling his own little roller, with 1 guy ahead and 1 guy behind. They got to board first, settle in and only then we were allowed in. I don't know if they handcuffed him on the plane, but they did get to sit in first in the last row. I saw one of the "escort" guys using the toilet twice, but the kid never came up to the front toilet on the MD80. The 3 did not get F meals served, only soft drinks. This is a second time I witnessed the same procedure, but the last time, about a month ago, there were 2 kids being escorted and they sat in the back, so I don't know who makes that decision. And they were also not handcuffed, but not very happy about their immidiate future. |
Originally Posted by fairviewroad
...So, if I'm reading this right, no officer sits in front of the prisoner? ...
JR |
Originally Posted by abmj-jr
Oh Lord, no! We don't even do that in an automobile unless it has a cage.
JR |
Originally Posted by Dianne47
2) Perhaps the alcohol was allowed to try to get him "to talk," as he had when paraded to the press in BKK. There now are reports that he made self-incriminating comments between the airport and the LAX jail. Jetlag plus booze equals verbal runoff?
I'm leaning toward him being a hoaxer trying, for whatever reason, to take advantage of the situation in his own sick way--some things about his supposed confession just don't seem to hang together. I guess the DNA will tell the tale in the end. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:39 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.